Methods for Transition Toward Computer Assisted Cognitive Examination

P. Jurica; S. Valenzi; Z. R. Struzik; A. Cichocki

doi:10.3414/ME14-01-0080

Methods of Information in Medicine, Table of Contents

Methods Inf Med 2015; 54(03): 256-261
DOI: 10.3414/ME14-01-0080

Original Articles

Schattauer GmbH

Methods for Transition Toward Computer Assisted Cognitive Examination

P. Jurica

¹RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan

,

S. Valenzi

¹RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan

,

Z. R. Struzik

¹RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan

,

A. Cichocki

¹RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan

²Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Introduction: We present a software framework which enables the extension of current methods for the assessment of cognitive fitness using recent technological advances.

Background: Screening for cognitive impairment is becoming more important as the world’s population grows older. Current methods could be enhanced by use of computers. Introduction of new methods to clinics requires basic tools for collection and communication of collected data.

Objectives: To develop tools that, with minimal interference, offer new opportunities for the enhancement of the current interview based cognitive examinations.

Methods: We suggest methods and discuss process by which established cognitive tests can be adapted for data collection through digitization by pen enabled tablets. We discuss a number of methods for evaluation of collected data, which promise to increase the resolution and objectivity of the common scoring strategy based on visual inspection. By involving computers in the roles of both instructing and scoring, we aim to increase the precision and reproducibility of cognitive examination.

Results: The tools provided in Python framework CogExTools available at http://bsp.brain.riken.jp/cogextools/ enable the design, application and evaluation of screening tests for assessment of cognitive impairment. The toolbox is a research platform; it represents a foundation for further collaborative development by the wider research community and enthusiasts. It is free to download and use, and open-source.

Conclusion: We introduce a set of open-source tools that facilitate the design and development of new cognitive tests for modern technology. We provide these tools in order to enable the adaptation of technology for cognitive examination in clinical settings. The tools provide the first step in a possible transition toward standardized mental state examination using computers.

Keywords

Cognitive test - cognitive impairment - health information exchange - health information database - open-source - software framework - Python programming language - computer-aided diagnosis

Full Text

References

References
1 Cullen B, O’Neill B, Evans JJ, Coen RF, Lawlor BA. A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 790-799.
2 Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40 (09) 922-935.
3 Wild K, Howieson D, Webbe F, Seelye A, Kaye J. The status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: A systematic review. Alzheimer’s Dement 2008; 4 (06) 428-437.
4 Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. ADHD: Is Objective Diagnosis Possible?. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 2005; 2 (11) 44-53.
5 Lichtenberg PA, Johnson AS, Erlanger DM, Kaushik T, Maddens ME, Imam K. et al. Enhancing cognitive screening in geriatric care: Use of an internet-based system. Int J Healthcare Inf Sys Informatics 2006; 1: 47-57.
6 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975; 12 (03) 189-198.
7 Hasegawa K. The clinical assessment of dementia in the aged: a dementia screening scale for psychogeriatric patients. Highlights of the 12th International Congress of Gerontology. 1983: 207-218.
8 Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Mont-real Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2005; 53: 695-699.
9 Mohs RC, Knopman D, Petersen RC. et al. Development of cognitive instruments for use in clinical trials of antidementia drugs: additions to the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) that broaden its scope. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997; 11: 13-21.
10 Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 1982; 140: 566-572.
11 Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 1993; 43 (11) 2412-2414.
12 Pinto E, Peters R. Literature review of the Clock Drawing Test as a tool for cognitive screening. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2009; 27 (03) 201-213.
13 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312 7023 71-72.
14 Krohne K, Torres S, Slettebø Å, Bergland A. Everyday uses of standardized test information in a geriatric setting: a qualitative study exploring occupational therapist and physiotherapist test administrators’ justifications. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 17: 14-72.
15 Smits EJ, Tolonen AJ, Cluitmans L, van Gils M, Conway BA, Zietsma RC, Leenders KL, Maurits NM. Standardized Handwriting to Assess Bradykinesia, Micrographia and Tremor in Parkinson’s Disease. PLOS ONE 2014; 9 (05) e97614.
16 Li Y, Clamann M, Kaber DB. Validation of a Haptic-Based Simulation to Test Complex Figure Reproduction Capability. IEEE Transactions of Human-Machine Systems 2013; 43 (06) 547-557.
17 Werner P, Rosenblum S, Bar-On G, Heinik J, Korczyn A. Handwriting process variables discriminating mild Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 2006; 61 B 228-236.
18 Rosenblum S, Samuel M, Zlotnik S, Erikh I, Schlesinger I. Handwriting as an objective tool for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis. Journal of Neurology 2013; 260 (09) 2357-2361.
19 Slavin MJ, Phillips JG, Bradshaw JL, Hall KA, Presnell I. Consistency of handwriting movements in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a comparison with Huntington’s and Parkinson’s diseases. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1999; 5 (01) 20-25.
20 Faundez-Zanuy M, Sesa-Nogueras E, Roure-Alcobé J, Garré-Olmo J, Lopez-de-Ipiña K, Solé-Casals J. Online drawings for dementia diagnose: in-air and pressure information analysis. MEDICON 2013. 2013: 25-28.
21 Camarda R, Camarda C, Monastero R, Grimaldi S, Camarda LKC, Pipia C, Caltagirone C, Gangitano M. Movements execution in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Behavioural Neurology 2007; 18: 135-142.
22 Kim H, Cho YS, Do EY. Computational clock drawing analysis for cognitive impairment screening. Tangible and Embedded Interaction. 2011: 297-300.
23 Frieling H, Bleich S, Marschollek M. Psychiatry and Informatics - Joining Forces to Improve Mental Health. Methods Inf Med 2012; 51: 1-2.
24 Yoshino K, Matsuoka K. Personal Adaptive Method to Assess Mental Tension during Daily Life Using Heart Rate Variability. Methods Inf Med 2012; 51: 39-44.
25 Mapstone M, Cheema AK, Fiandaca MS, Zhong X, Mhyre TR, Macarthur LH, Hall WJ, Fisher SG, Peterson DR, Haley JM, Nazar MD, Rich SA, Berlau DJ, Peltz CB, Tan MT, Kawas CH, Federoff HJ. Plasma phospholipids identify antecedent memory impairment in older adults. Nature Medicine 2014; 20: 415-418.
26 Sesa-Nogueras E, Faundez-Zanuy M, Mekyska J. An information analysis of in-air and on-surface trajectories in online handwriting. Cogn Comput 2012; 4: 195-205.
27 Culmer PR, Levesley MC, Mon-Williams M, Williams JH. A new tool for assessing human movement: The Ki-nematic Assessment Tool. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2009; 184 (01) 184-192.