Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2017; 56(06): 427-436
DOI: 10.3414/ME16-02-0043
Focus Theme – Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Application of N-of-1 Experiments to Test the Efficacy of Inactivity Alert Features in Fitness Trackers to Increase Breaks from Sitting in Older Adults

Dori E. Rosenberg
1   Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
,
Elyse Kadokura
2   Washington State Department of Health, Seattle, WA, USA
,
Margaret E. Morris
3   University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
,
Anne Renz
4   Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
,
Roger M. Vilardaga
5   Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
› Author AffiliationsThis study was funded by K23HL119352.
Further Information

Publication History

received: 18 November 2016

accepted: 24 July 2017

Publication Date:
10 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Background: Frequent breaks from sitting could improve health. Many commercially available fitness trackers deliver vibration alerts that could be used to cue sitting breaks. As a potentially pragmatic approach to promote frequent breaks from sitting, we tested the efficacy of inactivity alerts among obese older adults, a highly sedentary population.

Methods: We conducted 10 sequential N-of-1 (single-case) experimental ABA trials. Participants (mean age = 68, mean BMI = 35) were monitored for a baseline phase (“A1”) followed by an intervention phase (“B”). The intervention was then removed and participants were monitored to test an experimental effect (reversal “A2” phase). Total time in the study was limited to 25 days. During the intervention phase (“B”), participants used fitness trackers to stand up or move every time they received an alert (every 15 or 20 minutes of inactivity). Participants wore activPAL devices to measure breaks from sitting each day. Randomization tests were used to determine whether the number of breaks was significantly higher during the “B” phase than the two “A” phases.

Results: Breaks were higher by 7.2 breaks per day during the “B” phase compared to the mean of the “A” phases. Seven out of 10 participants had more sitting breaks during the intervention phase which subsequently decreased during the reversal “A2” phase (combined p-value < .05).

Conclusion: Inactivity alert features within commercially available devices are efficacious for promoting modest improvements in breaks from sitting among older adults with obesity and could be a simple health-promoting strategy in this population.

Keywords

Physical activity - sedentary behavior - aging - chronic conditions - sensors
 

  • References

  • 1 The NPD Group I. The Demographic Divide: Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches Attracting Very Different Segments of the Market, According to The NPD Group 2016. Available from: https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/ press-releases/2015/the-demographic-divide-fitness-trackers-and-smartwatches-attracting-verydifferent-segments-of-the-market-according-tothe-npd-group/.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Physical Activity Guidelines Committee. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report, 2008. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008 Available from: http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/Report/pdf/ CommitteeReport.pdf.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Choi J, Lee JH, Vittinghoff E, Fukuoka Y. mHealth Physical Activity Intervention: A Randomized Pilot Study in Physically Inactive Pregnant Women. Matern Child Health J 2016; 20 (05) 1091-101.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cadmus-Bertram L, Marcus BH, Patterson RE, Parker BA, Morey BL. Use of the Fitbit to Measure Adherence to a Physical Activity Intervention Among Overweight or Obese, Postmenopausal Women: Self-Monitoring Trajectory During 16 Weeks. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015; 03 (04) e96.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Robinson TN, Killen JD, Kraemer HC, Wilson DM, Matheson DM, Haskell WL. et al. Dance and reducing television viewing to prevent weight gain in African-American girls: the Stanford GEMS pilot study. Ethn Dis 2003; 13 1 Suppl 1 S65-77.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dontje ML, de Groot M, Lengton RR, van der Schans CP, Krijnen WP. Measuring steps with the Fitbit activity tracker: an inter-device reliability study. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology 2015; 39 (05) 286-290.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ford BS, McDonald TE, Owens AS, Robinson TN. Primary care interventions to reduce television viewing in African-American children. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22 (02) 106-109.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rosenberger ME, Buman MP, Haskell WL, McConnell MV, Carstensen LL. Twenty-four Hours of Sleep, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity with Nine Wearable Devices. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 48 (03) 457-465.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kooiman TJ, Dontje ML, Sprenger SR, Krijnen WP, van der Schans CP, de Groot M. Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation 2015; 07: 24.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sedentary Behaviour Research Network. Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2012; 37 (03) 540-542.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 de Rezende LF, Rey-Lopez JP, Matsudo VK, do Carmo Luiz O. Sedentary behavior and health outcomes among older adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2014; 14 (01) 333.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Robinson TN, Hammer LD, Killen JD, Kraemer HC, Wilson DM, Hayward C. et al. Does television viewing increase obesity and reduce physical activity? Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses among adolescent girls. Pediatrics 1993; 91 (02) 273-280.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Harvey JA, Chastin SF, Skelton DA. How Sedentary are Older People? A Systematic Review of the Amount of Sedentary Behavior. J Aging Phys Act 2015; 23 (03) 471-487.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rosenberg DE, Gell NM, Jones SM, Renz A, Kerr J, Gardiner PA. et al. The Feasibility of Reducing Sitting Time in Overweight and Obese Older Adults. Health Educ Behav 2015; 42 (05) 669-676.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gardiner PA, Eakin EG, Healy GN, Owen N. Feasibility of reducing older adults’ sedentary time. Am J Prev Med 2011; 41 (02) 174-177.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fitzsimons CF, Kirk A, Baker G, Michie F, Kane C, Mutrie N. Using an individualised consultation and activPAL feedback to reduce sedentary time in older Scottish adults: results of a feasibility and pilot study. Prev Med 2013; 57 (05) 718-720.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lally P, Gardner B. Promoting habit formation. Health Psychol Rev 2013; 07: S137-S58.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gardner B, Lally P, Wardle J. Making health habitual: the psychology of ‘habit-formation’ and general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2012; 62 (605) 664-666.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Skinner BF. Science and human behavior. New York: MacMillan; 1953
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, Dombrowski SU, Bishop A, French DP. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health 2011; 26 (11) 1479-1498.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W. et al. The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions. Ann Behav Med 2013; 46 (01) 81-95.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kerr J, Takemoto M, Bolling K, Atkin A, Carlson J, Rosenberg D. et al. Two-Arm Randomized Pilot Intervention Trial to Decrease Sitting Time and Increase Sit-To-Stand Transitions in Working and Non-Working Older Adults. PLoS One 2016; 11 (01) e0145427.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Dallery J, Cassidy RN, Raiff BR. Single-case experimental designs to evaluate novel technologybased health interventions. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15 (02) e22.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Riley WT, Glasgow RE, Etheredge L, Abernethy AP. Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clinical and Translational Medicine 2013; 02 (01) 10.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Vilardaga R, Bricker J, McDonell M. The promise of mobile technologies and single case designs for the study of individuals in their natural environment. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 2014; 03 (02) 148-153.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Dallery J, Raiff BR. Optimizing behavioral health interventions with single-case designs: from development to dissemination. Transl Behav Med 2014; 04 (03) 290-303.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA 2012; 307 (05) 491-497.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. Older Americans 2010: key indicators of well-being. Washington, D.C: Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics; 2010 Available from: https://agingstats.gov/docs/LatestReport/ Older-Americans-2016-Key-Indicators-of-WellBeing.pdf.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Shiroma EJ, Freedson P, Trost SG, Lee IM. Patterns of accelerometer-assessed sedentary behavior in older women. JAMA 2013; 310 (23) 2562-2563.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Der Ananian C, Wilcox S, Saunders R, Watkins K, Evans A. Factors that influence exercise among adults with arthritis in three activity levels. Prev Chronic Dis 2006; 03 (03) A81.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lee C, Ory MG, Yoon J, Forjuoh SN. Neighborhood walking among overweight and obese adults: age variations in barriers and motivators. Journal of Community Health 2013; 38 (01) 12-22.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ekkekakis P, Lind E. Exercise does not feel the same when you are overweight: the impact of selfselected and imposed intensity on affect and exertion. International Journal of Obesity 2006; 30 (04) 652-660.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37 11 Suppl S531-S543.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Onghena P, Edgington ES. Customization of pain treatments: single-case design and analysis. Clin J Pain 2005; 21 (01) 56-68 discussion 9–72.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Edgington ES, Onghena P. Randomization Tests. 4th ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Ter Kuile MM, Bulte I, Weijenborg PT, Beekman A, Melles R, Onghena P. Therapist-aided exposure for women with lifelong vaginismus: a replicated single-case design. J Consult Clin Psychol 2009; 77 (01) 149-159.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Lyden K, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS. Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43 (08) 1561-1567.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hart TL, Ainsworth BE, Tudor-Locke C. Objective and subjective measures of sedentary behavior and physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43 (03) 449-456.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Grant PM, Dall PM, Mitchell SL, Granat MH. Activity-monitor accuracy in measuring step number and cadence in community-dwelling older adults. J Aging Phys Act 2008; 16 (02) 201-214.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Staudenmayer J, Freedson P. The feasibility of reducing and measuring sedentary time among overweight, non-exercising office workers. J Obes 2012; 2012: 282303.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kratochwill TR, Hitchcock JH, Horner RH, Levin JR, Odom SL, Rindskopf DM. et al. Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards. Remedial and Special Education 2013; 34 (01) 26-38.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Bulte I, Onghena P. SCRT: Single-Case Randomization Tests. R package version 1.1.1. 2015 Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SCRT.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 R Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013 [cited 2014]. Available from: www.R-project.org.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Heyvaert M. Randomization tests for single-case experiments: state of the art, state of the science, and state of the application. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 2014; 03 (01) 51-64.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Ma HH. An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single-subject researches: percentage of data points exceeding the median. Behav Modif 2006; 30 (05) 598-617.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Bulte I. SCMA: Single-Case Meta-Analysis. R package version 1.1.1. 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Bulte I, Onghena P. SCVA: Single-Case Visual Analysis. R package version 1.1.1. 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Peng CJ, Chen L. Algorithms for Assessing Intervention Effects in Single-Case Studies. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 2015 14. 01.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Chen LT, Peng CY, Chen ME. Computing Tools for Implementing Standards for Single-Case Designs. Behav Modif 2015; 39 (06) 835-869.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Bond DS, Vithiananthan S, Thomas JG, Trautvetter J, Unick JL, Jakicic JM. et al. Bari-Active: a randomized controlled trial of a preoperative intervention to increase physical activity in bariatric surgery patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015; 11 (01) 169-177.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Coyne SM, Nelson DA, Robinson SL, Gundersen NC. Is viewing ostracism on television distressing?. J Soc Psychol 2011; 151 (03) 213-217.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Smith JD. Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods 2012; 17 (04) 510-550.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar