Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22(01): 7-15
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-07-12-0110
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Radiographic analysis of trochlear notch sclerosis in the diagnosis of osteoarthritis secondary to medial coronoid disease

D. Draffan
1   Institute of Comparative Medicine Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK
,
I. Carrera
1   Institute of Comparative Medicine Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK
,
S. Carmichael
1   Institute of Comparative Medicine Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK
,
J. Heller
1   Institute of Comparative Medicine Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK
,
G. Hammond
2   Hospital for Small Animals, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 08 December 2007

Accepted: 13 May 2008

Publication Date:
17 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Trochlear notch sclerosis (TNS) as assessed by radiography has been shown to be increased in elbow dysplasia (ED) associated medial coronoid process disease (MCD). The aims of this study were to investigate whether two defined radiographic tests evaluating TNS would increase the sensitivity of detecting osteoarthritis secondary to MCD, and to assess whether there was a correlation between increasing TNS with severity of MCD. Sixty-one dogs with MCD (121 elbows) were selected from the imaging database. The controls were nine cadavers (18 disease-free elbows). Standard International Elbow Working Group radiographs and CT scans were taken of each elbow. Plain radiographs were analysed using various assessments: osteophyte grade (0–3), coronoid grade (0–3), TNS descriptive grade (0–3) and TNS ratio. The TNS ratio was calculated from the depth of ulnar sclerosis at the level of the disto-cranial margin of the humeral condyles divided by the cranio-caudal ulna depth. The TNS descriptive assessment and ratio both increased the overall sensitivity of diagnosing osteoarthritis secondary to MCD above the other radiographic tests. The sensitivity of the TNS ratio at <0.3 mm was 91%-96% and the TNS descriptive assessment was 77%-96%. Radio-graphic TNS significantly increased with increasing severity of coronoid disease grade as evaluated by CT p<0.01. The finding that TNS increases the sensitivity of diagnosing osteoarthritis secondary to MCD is valuable to those that have neither a CT scanner nor arthroscopy readily available. The assessments described in this study are easy to apply and do not require any sophisticated technology in order to detect sclerosis.

Keywords

Trochlear notch sclerosis - medial coronoid disease - elbow dysplasia
 

  • References

  • 1 Gemmill TJ, Clements DN. Fragmented coronoid process in the dog: is there a role for incongruency?. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48: 361-368.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Danielson KC, Fitzpatrick N, Muir P. et al. Histomorphometry of fragmented medial coronoid process in dogs: a comparison of affected and normal coronoid processes. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 501-509.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schulz KS, Krotscheck U. Canine elbow dysplasia. In: Slatter D. editor. A textbook of small animal surgery. 3rded Philadelphia: W.B; Saunders 2003: 1927-1952.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Samoy Y, Van Ryssen B, Gielen I. et al. Review of the literature – Elbow incongruity in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 1-8.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tromblee TC, Jones JC, Bahr AM. et al. Effect of computed tomography display window and image plane on diagnostic certainty for characteristics of dysplastic elbow joints in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68: 858-871.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wind AP. Elbow incongruity and developmental elbow diseases in the dog .1. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 711-724.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wind AP, Packard ME. Elbow incongruity and developmental elbow diseases in the dog. 2. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 22: 725-730.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fluckiger M. [Elbow dysplasia in the dog]. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 1992; 134: 261-271.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Van Ryssen B, van Bree H. Arthroscopic findings in 100 dogs with elbow lameness. Vet Rec 1997; 140: 360-362.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Grondalen J. Arthrosis with special reference to the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. II. Occurrence, clinical and radiographical findings. Nord Vet Med 1979; 31: 69-75.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Grondalen J. Arthrosis with special reference to the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. I A review of the literature. Nord Vet Med 1979; 31: 62-68.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grondalen J. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. III. Ununited medical coronoid process of the ulna and osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral condyle. Surgical procedure for correction and postoperative investigation. Nord Vet Med 1979; 31: 520-527.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Grondalen J. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. VI. Interrelation between clinical, radiographical and pathoanatomical findings. Nord Vet Med 1982; 34: 65-75.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Grondalen J. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. VII. Occurrence in the Rottweiler breed. Nord Vet Med 1982; 34: 76-82.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Grondalen J, Grondalen T. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. V. A pathoanatomical investigation. Nord Vet Med 1981; 33: 1-16.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Grondalen J, Lingaas F. Arthrosis of the elbow joint among Rottweiler dogs. Results from investigations into hereditary disposition. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 1988; 113 (Suppl. 01) 49S-51S.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Grondalen J, Rorvik AM. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. IV. Ununited anconeal process. A follow up investigation of operated dogs. Nord Vet Med 1980; 32: 212-218.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Morgan JP, Wind A, Davidson AP. Bone dysplasias in the Labrador retriever: A radiographic study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1999; 35: 332-340.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Olsson SE. The early diagnosis of fragmented coronoid process and osteochondritis dissecans of the canine elbow joint. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1983; 19: 616-626.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Carpenter LG, Schwarz PD, Lowry JE. et al. Comparison of radiologic imaging techniques for diagnosis of fragmented medial coronoid process of the cubital joint in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 78-83.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Snaps FR, Balligand MH, Saunders JH. et al. Comparison of radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical findings in dogs with elbow dysplasia. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 1367-1370.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Snaps FR, Park RD, Saunders JH. et al. Magnetic resonance arthrography of the cubital joint in dogs affected with fragmented medial coronoid processes. A J Vet Res 1999; 60: 190-193.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Snaps FR, Saunders JH, Park RD. et al. Comparison of spin echo, gradient echo and fat saturation magnetic resonance imaging sequences for imaging the canine elbow. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998; 39: 518-523.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dennis R KR, Wrigley RH, Barr F. Handbook of small animal radiological differential diagnosis. Saunders 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Burton NJ, Comerford EJ, Bailey M. et al. Digital analysis of ulnar trochlear notch sclerosis in Labrador Retrievers. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48: 220-224.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 De Rycke LM, Gielen IM, van Bree H. et al. Computed tomography of the elbow joint in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 1400-1407.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rovesti GL, Biasibetti M, Schumacher A. et al. The use of the computed tomography in the diagnostic protocol of the elbow in the dog: 24 joints. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15: 35-43.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lang J, Busato A, Baumgartner D. et al. Comparison of two classification protocols in the evaluation of elbow dysplasia in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 169-174.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Haudiquet PR, Marcellin-Little DJ, Stebbins ME. Use of the distomedial-proximolateral oblique radiographic view of the elbow joint for examination of the medial coronoid process in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 1000-1005.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wosar MA, Lewis DD, Neuwirth L. et al. Radio-graphic evaluation of elbow joints before and after surgery in dogs with possible fragmented medial coronoid process. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 214: 52-58.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Berry CR. Evaluation of the canine elbow for fragmented medial coronoid process. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1992; 33: 273-276.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Gemmill TJ, Hammond G, Mellor D. et al. Use of reconstructed computed tomography for the assessment of joint spaces in the canine elbow. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47: 66-74.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Moores AP, Benigni L, Lamb CR. Computed tomography versus arthroscopy for the detection of canine elbow dysplasia lesions. Veterinary Orthopaedic Society Congress; March 8–15 2008. Big Sky: Montana; 2008: 51
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Wolschrijn CF, Weijs WA. Development of the subchondral bone layer of the medial coronoid process of the canine ulna. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2005; 284: 439-445.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wolschrijn CF, Weijs WA. Development of the trabecular structure within the ulnar medial coronoid process of young dogs. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2004; 278: 514-519.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Meyer-Lindenberg A, Langhann A, Fehr M. et al. Prevalence of fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna in lame adult dogs. Vet Rec 2002; 151: 230-234.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Meyer-Lindenberg A, Fehr M, Nolte I. Co-existence of ununited anconeal process and fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47: 61-65.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Gemmill TJ, Mellor DJ, Clements DN. et al. Evaluation of elbow incongruency using reconstructed CT in dogs suffering fragmented coronoid process. J Small Anim Pract 2005; 46: 327-333.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 LaFond E, Breur GJ, Austin CC. Breed susceptibility for developmental orthopedic diseases in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2002; 38: 467-477.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Bonagura JD.. editor Kirk’s Current Veterinary Therapy XIII. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Salg KG, Temwitchitr J, Imholz S. et al. Assessment of collagen genes involved in fragmented medial coronoid process development in Labrador Retrievers as determined by affected sibling-pair analysis. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 1713-1718.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Lewis DD, Parker RB, Hager DA. Fragmented medial coronoid process of the canine elbow. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1989; 11: 703-706. 708, 710, 712-715
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Huibregste BA, Johnson AL, Muhlbauer M. et al. The effect of treatment of fragmented coronoid process on the development of osteoarthritis of the elbow. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1994; 190-195.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Bennett D, Duff SRI, Kene RO. et al. Osteochondritis dissecans and fragmentation of the coronoid process in the elbow joint of the dog. Vet Rec 1981; 109: 329-336.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Henry Jr WB. Radiographic diagnosis and surgical management of fragmented medial coronoid process in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1984; 184: 799-805.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Samii VF, Les Clifford M, Schulz KS. et al. Computed tomographic osteoabsorptiometry of the elbow joint in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 1159-1166.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Korbel J MU, Maierl J, Muller-Gerbl M. Ct-Osteoabsorptiometry in dogs with elbow diseases. 10thCongress European Society of Veterinary Orthopaedics and Traumatology; 23-26thMarch 2000 Munich 2000: 91-92.
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Korbel J, Wilcken R, Huskamp B. Computed tomographic examination of the canine elbow joint. Kleintierpraxis 2001; 46: 325-331.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Clarke S, Wakeley C, Duddy J. et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry applied to the assessment of tibial subchondral bone mineral density in osteoarthritis of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 2004; 33: 588-595.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Christensen P, Kjaer J, Melsen F. et al. The Subchondral Bone of the Proximal Tibial Epiphysis in Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1982; 53: 889-895.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Eckstein F, Lohe F, Muller-Gerbl M. et al. Stress distribution in the trochlear notch. A model of bicentric load transmission through joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76: 647-653.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Preston CA, Schulz KS, Kass PH. In vitro determination of contact areas in the normal elbow joint of dogs. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61: 1315-1321.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar