Comparative study of vertebral fractures and luxations in dogs and cats

Summary

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare patterns of vertebral fractures and luxations in 42 cats and 47 dogs, and to evaluate the impact of species-related differences on clinical outcome. Data regarding aetiology, neurological status, radiographic appearance and follow-up were compared between the groups. The thoracolumbar (Th3-L3) area was the most commonly affected location in both cats (49%) and dogs (58%). No lesions were observed in the cervical vertebral segments in cats, and none of the cats showed any signs of a Schiff-Sherrington syndrome. Vertebral luxations were significantly more frequent in dogs (20%) than in cats (6%), whereas combined fracture-luxations occurred significantly more often in cats (65%) than in dogs (37%). Caudal vertebral segment displacement was mostly dorsal in cats and ventral in dogs, with a significant difference in direction between cats and large dogs. The clinical outcome did not differ significantly between the two populations, and was poor in most cases (cats: 61%; dogs: 56%). The degree of dislocation and axis deviation were both significantly associated with a worse outcome in dogs, but not in cats. Although several differences in vertebral fractures and luxation patterns exist between cats and dogs, these generally do not seem to affect outcome.

Keywords

Vertebral fractures - vertebral luxations - cats - dogs

• References

• 1 Bagley RS. Spinal fracture or luxation. In: Vet Clin North Am Small Anim 2000; 1: 133-153.
• 2 Marioni-Henry K, Vite CH, Newton AL. et al. Prevalence of diseases of the spinal cord in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2004; 18: 851-858.
• 3 Fluehmann G, Doherr MG, Jaggy A. Canine neurological diseases in a referral hospital population between 1989 and 2000 in Switzerland. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47: 582-587.
• 4 Besalti O, Ozak A, Tong S. Management of spinal trauma in 69 cats. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschau 2002; 109: 315-320.
• 5 Grasmueck S, Steffen F. Survival rates and outcomes in cats with thoracic and lumbar spinal cord injuries due to external trauma. J Small Anim Pract 2004; 45: 284-288.
• 6 McKee WM. Spinal trauma in dogs and cats: A review of 51 cases. Vet Rec 1990; 126: 285-289.
• 7 Selcer RR, Bubb WJ, Walker TL. Management of vertebral column fractures in dogs and cats: 211 cases (1977–1985). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991; 198: 1965-1968.
• 8 Feeney DA, Oliver JE. Blunt spinal trauma in the dog and cat: insights into radiographic lesions. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1980; 16: 885-890.
• 9 Sharp NJH, Wheeler SJ. Patient examination. In: small animal spinal disorders: diagnosis and surgery. 2^nded. London: Mosby-Wolfe; 2005: 19-33.
• 10 Shores A. Pathophysiology and management of traumatic spinal injuries. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim 1992; 22: 859-888.
• 11 Sharp NJH, Wheeler SJ. Trauma. In: Small animal spinal disorders: diagnosis and surgery. 2^nded. London: Mosby-Wolfe; 2005: 281-318.
• 12 De Lahunta A. Spinal cord disease. In: Veterinary neuroanatomy and clinical neurology. 1^sted. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders; 1977: 169-220.
• 13 Sprague JM. Spinal “Border Cells” and their role in postural mechanism (Schiff-Sherrington Phenomenon). J Neurophysiol 1953; 16: 464-474.
• 14 Hoerlein BF. Spinal fractures, luxations and fusions. In: Canine neurology. 3^rded. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders 1978; 561-592.
• 15 Hawthorne JC, Blevins WE, Wallace LJ. et al. Cervical vertebral fractures in 56 dogs: A retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1999; 35: 135-146.
• 16 Hare WCD. Zur Ossifikation und Vereinigung der Wirbelepiphysen beim Hund. Wiener Tierärztliche Monatsschrift 1961; 48: 210-215.