Evaluation of vertical forces in the pads of German Shepherd dogs

A. N. A. Souza; A. C. B. C. F. Pinto; V. Marvulle; J. M. Matera

doi:10.3415/VCOT-11-07-0100

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26(01): 06-11
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-11-07-0100

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of vertical forces in the pads of German Shepherd dogs

A. N. A. Souza

¹Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

,

A. C. B. C. F. Pinto

¹Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

,

V. Marvulle

²Center of Mathematical, Computation and Cognition, University of ABC, São Paulo, Brazil

,

J. M. Matera

¹Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Objective: To evaluate vertical forces in the pads of German Shepherd dogs by relative percentage among total limb vertical forces using a pressure sensitive walkway.

Procedure: A pressure sensitive walkway was used to collect vertical force data for each pad of the limbs of 16 healthy client-owned German Shepherd dogs used for kinetic gait analysis. The vertical force for each pad was evaluated as a percentage of total limb vertical force. Weight distribution among limbs was also recorded. Velocity and acceleration were within a range of 1.3 and 1.6 ± 0.1 m/s². The ANOVA test was used to compare data and the paired t-test was used to assess symmetry (p <0.05).

Results: The peak vertical force was higher on the metacarpal pad than on the metatarsal pad. Peak vertical force was highest on the metacarpal pad and metatarsal pad followed by the digital pads 3, 4 and 5 of the forelimb, and on the hindlimb by digital pads 3 and 4. Vertical impulse was greatest in the metacarpal pad and digital pads 3 and 4 of the forelimb and hindlimb respectively, followed by digital pads 3, 4, and 5 of the forelimb and the metatarsal pad.

Conclusion and clinical relevance: A vertical force distribution pattern was observed on the pads of the German Shepherd dogs. These data are important for improving the understanding of vertical force distribution during gait and to assess orthopaedic conditions.

Keywords

Vertical force - kinetic evaluation - dogs - pads - locomotion

Full Text

References

References
1 Defoe D. The measurement of footprints (Pedobarography). In: Klenerman L, Wood B. editors. The Human Foot: A Companion to Clinical Studies. London: Springer; 2006. pg. 117-136.
2 Bouisset S, Marley EJ. On when motion biomechanics emerged as a science. In: Cappozo A, Marchetti M, Tosi V. editors. Biolocomotion: A Century of Research Using Moving Pictures. Rome: Promograph; 1992. pg. 77-79.
3 Elftman H, Manter JT. The axis of the human foot. Science 1934; 80: 484.
4 Elftman H, Manter J. Chimpanzee and human feet in bipedal walking. Am J Phys Anthropol 1935; 20: 69-79.
5 Betts RP, Franks CI, Duckworth T, et al. Static and dynamic foot pressure measurements in clinical orthopaedics. Med Biolog Eng Comput 1980; 18: 674-684.
6 Birtane M, Tuna H. The evaluation of plantar pressure distribution in obese and non-obese adults. Clin Biomech 2004; 19: 1055-1059.
7 Scott G, Menz HB, Newcombe L. Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait Posture 2007; 26: 68-75.
8 Hennig EM, Rosenbaum D. Pressure distribution patterns under the feet of children in comparison with adults. Foot Ankle 1991; 11: 306-311.
9 Liu XC, Thometz JG, Tassone C. et al. Dynamic plantar pressure measurement for the normal subject: Free-mapping model for the analysis of pediatric foot deformities. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25: 103-106.
10 Hughes J, Jagoe JR, Klenerman L. Assessment of foot pressure patterns from a pedobarograph using image analysis techniques. Proc Physiol Soc J Physiol 1987; 384-387.
11 Hessert MJ, Vias M, Leach J. et al. Foot pressure distribution during walking in young and adults. BMC Geriatr 2005; 5: 8.
12 Zammit GV, Menz HB, Munteanu SE. et al. Plantar pressure distribution in older people with osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (hallux limitus/rigidus). J Orthop Res 2008; 26: 1665-1669.
13 Yavuz M, Ocak H, Hetherington VJ. et al. Prediction of plantar shear stress distribution by artificial intelligence methods. J Biomech Eng 2009; 131: 91-97.
14 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW. Force plate analysis of the walking gait in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1987; 48: 915-918.
15 Decamp CE. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis and the assessment of lameness in the dog. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1997; 27: 825-841.
16 Marghitu DB, Swaim SF, Rumph PF. et al. Dynamics analysis of ground contact pressure of English Pointer Dogs. Nonlinear Dynamics 2003; 33: 253-265.
17 Besancon MF, Conzemius MG, Evans RB. et al. Distribution of vertical forces in the pads of Greyhounds and Labrador Retrievers during walking. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65: 1497-1501.
18 Renberg WC, Johnston SA, Ye K. Comparison of stance time and velocity as control variables in force plate analysis of dogs. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 814-819.
19 Lascelles BD, Roe SC, Smith E. et al. Evaluation of a pressure walkway system for measurement of vertical limb forces in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 277-282.
20 Dulaney D, Purinton T, Dookwah H. et al. Effect of starting distance on vertical ground reaction forces in the normal dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 183-185.
21 Molsa SH, Hielm-Bjorkman AK, Laitinen-Vapaavuori OM. Force platform analysis in clinically healthy Rottweilers: comparison with Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 701-707.
22 Agostinho FS, Rahal SC, Miqueleto NSML. et al. Kinematic analysis of Labrador Retrievers and Rottweilers trotting on a treadmill. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 3: 185-191.
23 Durant AM, Millis DL, Headrick JF. Kinematics of stair ascent in healthy dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 2: 99-105.
24 Kim SY, Kim JY, Hayashi K. et al. Skin movement during the kinematic analysis of the canine pelvic limb. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 5: 326-332.
25 Guillou RP, Déjardin LM, McDonald C. et al. 3-Dimensional kinematics of the normal canine elbow at the walk and at the trot [abstract]. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Veterinary Orthopedic Society. 2012. March 3-10 Crested Butte CO, USA: Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012. 25 A7.
26 Malek S, Moens NMM, Monteith GJ. The precision and repeatability of a custom-made pointer device for determination of virtual landmarks in canine three-dimensional kinematics. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 2: 102-108.
27 Besancon MF, Conzemius MG, Derrick TR. et al. Comparison of vertical forces in normal greyhounds between force platform and pressure walkway measurement systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 153-157.
28 Souza AN, Tartarunas AC, Marvulle V. et al. Pads pressure distribution in Pittbulls with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Proceedings of the 2011 ACVS Veterinary Symposium. 2011. November 3-5 Chicago IL, USA: pg. E47.
29 Beraud R, Moreau M, Lussier B. Effect of exercise on kinetic gait analysis of dogs afflicted by osteoarthritis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 87-92.
30 Gibert S, Lequang T, Maitre P. et al. Sensitivity and specificity to determine lameness in dogs with a pressure walkway system [abstract]. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Veterinary Orthopedic Society. 2012. March 3-10 Crested Butte CO, USA: Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012. 25 A21.
31 Fanchon L, Grandjean D. Accuracy of asymmetry indices of ground reaction forces for diagnosis of hind limb lameness in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68: 1089-1094.
32 Besancon MF, Conzemius MG, Derrick TR. et al. Comparison of vertical forces in normal greyhounds between force platform and pressure walkway measurement systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 153-157.
33 Riggs CM, Decamp CE, Soutas-little RW. Effects of subject velocity on force plate measured ground reaction forces in healthy Greyhounds at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 1523-1526.
34 Voss K, Wiestner T, Galeandro L. et al. Effect of dog breed and body conformation on vertical ground reaction forces, impulses, and stance times. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 106-112.
35 Voss K, Damur DM, Guerrero T. et al. Force plate gait analysis to assess limb function after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 243-249.
36 Poy NS, Decamp CE, Bennett RL. et al. Additional kinematic variables to describe differences in the trot between clinically normal dogs and dogs with hip dysplasia. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61: 974-978.
37 Souza AN, Pinto ACBCF, Tartarunas AC. et al. Correlation between hip joint radiographic classification and kinetic analysis in german shepherd dogs. Proceedings of the 2011 ACVS Veterinary Symposium. 2011. November 3-5 Chicago IL, USA: pg. E47.