Clinical audit for the tibial tuberosity advancement procedure

J. L. J. Proot; S. A. Corr

doi:10.3415/VCOT-12-04-0052

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26(04): 280-284
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-12-04-0052

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

Clinical audit for the tibial tuberosity advancement procedure

Establishing the learning curve and monitoring ongoing performance for the tibial tuberosity advancement procedure using the cumulative summation technique

J. L. J. Proot

¹Calder Vets Ltd, Dewsbury, West-Yorkshire, UK

,

S. A. Corr

²Division of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton, Bonington, UK

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Objective To quantitatively assess the learning curve for the tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) procedure performed by a single surgeon using the cumulative summation (CUSUM) technique and to determine if surgeon performance remained under control (i.e. within specified quality boundaries) after the learning curve had been climbed. Study design: Retrospective study.

Animals Dogs (n = 122) with cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifles (n = 167).

Methods Records of all dogs that had a TTA procedure performed by the same surgeon were reviewed. Cases were included if the following information was available: weight, breed, date of surgery, presence of partial or full cruciate rupture, meniscal pathology, occurrence and description of postoperative complications and treatment with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Patients were excluded if they had a concurrent illness. Major complications were defined as those requiring revision surgery. The CUSUM technique was used to determine the time taken for the surgeon to reach a pre-defined level of competency and to monitor ongoing performance.

Results Major complications occurred in 15 out of 167 procedures (9%) within 12 months of TTA surgery. The complication rate decreased as surgical experience was gained with the technique, however the learning curve continued until the 22nd procedure. Thereafter, despite the target complication rate being re-set at a lower level, the surgeon's performance remained acceptable, i.e. within the revised quality boundary.

Clinical significance The CUSUM technique was used for clinical audit, to determine the learning curve for the TTA procedure for a single surgeon, and to monitor ongoing performance. An experienced general practitioner had a learning curve of 22 procedures and complication rates were within the published ranges.

Keywords

Clinical audit - tibial tuberosity advancement - cruciate - cumulative summationx

Full Text

References

References
1 Wilke VL, Robinson DA, Evans RB. et al. Estimate of the annual economic impact of treatment of cranial cruciate ligament injury in dogs in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227: 1604-1607.
2 Montavon PM, Damur DM, Tepic S. Advancement of the tibial tuberosity for the treatment of cranial cruciate deficient canine stifle. Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopedic Veterinary Congress. 2002. September 5-8 Munich, Germany: p. 152.
3 Boudrieau RJ. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or tibial tuberosity advancement?. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 1-22.
4 Hoffman DE, Miller JM, Ober CP. et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement in 65 canine stifles. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 219-227.
5 Lafaver S, Miller NA, Stubbs WP. et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement for stabilization of the canine cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joint: surgical technique, early results, and complications in 101 dogs. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 573-586.
6 Stein S, Schmoekel H. Short-term and eight to 12 month results of a tibial tuberosity advancement as treatment of canine cranial cruciate ligament damage. J Small Anim Pract 2008; 49: 398-404.
7 Voss K, Damur DM, Guerrero T. et al. Force plate gait analysis to assess limb function after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 3: 243-249.
8 Steinberg EJ, Prata RG, Palazzini K. et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement for treatment of CrCL injury: Complications and owner satisfaction. J Am Hosp Assoc 2011; 47: 250-257.
9 Gambardella PC, Wallace LJ, Cassidy F. Lateral suture technique for management of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: a retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1981; 17: 33-38.
10 Elkins AD, Pechman R, Kearney MT. A retrospective study evaluating the degree of degenerative joint disease in the stifle joint of dogs following surgical repair of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 27: 533-540.
11 Aragon CL, Budsberg SC. Applications of evidence-based medicine: cranial cruciate ligament injury repair in the dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 93-98.
12 Vasseur PB, Berry CR. Progression of stifle osteoarthrosis following reconstruction of the cranial cruciate ligament in 21 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1992; 28: 129-136.
13 Innes JF, Costella M, Barr FJ. Radiographic progression of osteoarthritis of the canine stifle joint: a prospective study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2004; 45: 143-148.
14 Rayward RM, Thomson DG, Davies JV. Progression of osteoarthritis following TPLO surgery: a prospective radiographic study of 40 dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2004; 45: 92-97.
15 Lazar TP, Berry CR, deHaan JJ. Long-term radiographic comparison of tibia plateau leveling osteotomy versus extracapsular stabilization for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 133-141.
16 Lineberger JA, Allen DA, Wilson ER. et al. Comparison of radiographic arthritic changes associated with two variations of tibia plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 13-37.
17 Boyd DJ, Miller CW, Etue SM. et al. Radiographic and functional evaluation of dogs at least 1 year after tibia plateau leveling osteotomy. Can Vet J 2007; 48: 392-396.
18 Morgan JP, Voss K, Damur DM. et al. Correlation of radiographic changes after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate-deficient stifles with functional outcome. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 425-432.
19 Young A, Miller JP, Azarow MC. Establishing learning curves for surgical residents using cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis. Curr Surg 2005; 62: 330-334.
20 Van Rij AM, McDonald JR, Pettigrew RA. et al. CUSUM as an aid to early assessment of the surgical trainee. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 1500-1503.
21 Hayes GM, Ramirez J, Langley Hobbs SJ. Use of the cumulative summation technique to quantitatively assess a surgical learning curve: canine total hip replacement. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 1-5.
22 de Leval MR, Francois K, Bull C. et al. Analysis of a cluster of surgical failures: application to a series of neonatal arterial switch operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107: 914-924.
23 Bolsin S, Colson M. The use of CUSUM technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 2000; 12: 433-438.
24 Metelmann LA, Schwarz P, Salman M. An evaluation of three different cranial cruciate ligament surgical stabilization procedures as they relate to postoperative meniscal injuries: a retrospective study of 665 stifles. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 8: 118-123.
25 Thieman KM, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB. et al. Effect of meniscal release on rate of subsequent meniscal tears and owner-assessed outcome in dogs with cruciate disease treated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 705-710.
26 Burns CG, Boudrieau RJ. Modified tibial tuberosity advancement procedure with tuberosity advancement in excess of 12mm in four large breed dogs with cranial cruciate ligament-deficient joints. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 250-255.
27 Kestin IG. A statistical approach to measuring the competence of anaesthetic trainees at practical procedures. Br J Anaesthesia 1995; 75: 805-809.
28 Steiner SH, Cook RJ, Farewell VT. et al. Monitoring surgical performance using risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts. Biostatistics 2000; 1: 441-452.

Supplementary Material

Online Supplementary Material (PDF)