Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27(03): 192-197
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-13-06-0074
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Retrospective evaluation of canine and feline maxillomandibular trauma cases

A comparison of signalment with non-maxillomandibular traumatic injuries (2003–2012)
B. L. Mulherin
1   Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
,
C. J. Snyder
1   Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
,
J. W. Soukup
1   Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
,
S. Hetzel
2   Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 12 June 2013

Accepted 22 February 2013

Publication Date:
21 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Objectives: To determine differences in signalment between maxillomandibular (MM) and non-maxillomandibular (non-MM) trauma patients to help predict the type of injury sustained.

Methods: A medical records database was searched from December 2003 to September 2012 to identify all MM trauma patients. A random sample of non-MM trauma patients was generated for comparison. Patient species, age, sex, weight, and injury aetiology were recorded for both populations.

Results: Sixty-seven MM trauma patients and 129 non-MM trauma patients were identified. Feline patients were almost twice as likely to be presented for MM trauma compared with non-MM trauma. The median weight of canine patients suffering MM injury was significantly less than that of non- MM patients (p = 0.025). A significant association existed between the causes of injuries associated with MM and non-MM trauma populations (p = 0.000023). The MM trauma patients were more likely to sustain injury as a result of an animal altercation (Bonferroni p = 0.001) while non-MM injuries were more likely to result from motor vehicle accidents (Bonferroni p = 0.001). Overall, animals that were less than one year of age with traumatic injuries were overrepresented (65/196) in comparison to the entire patient population.

Clinical significance: The results of this study may help guide clinicians in the evaluation and screening of trauma patients that are presented as an emergency. Cats, small dogs and animals suffering from animal altercations should all be closely evaluated for MM injury.

 
  • References

  • 1 Umphlet RC, Johnson AL. Mandibular fractures in the dog. A retrospective study of 157 cases. Vet Surg 1990; 19: 272-275.
  • 2 Phillips IR. A survey of bone fractures in the dog and cat. J Small Anim Pract 1979; 20: 661-674.
  • 3 Lopes FM, Gioso MA, Ferro DG. et al. Oral fractures in dogs of Brazil-a retrospective study. J Vet Dent 2005; 22: 86-90.
  • 4 Soukup JW, Mulherin BL, Snyder CJ. Prevalence and nature of dentoalveolar injuries amoung patients with maxillofacial fractures. J Small Anim Pract 2013; 54: 9-14.
  • 5 Hansen T, Kunkel M, Katenkamp D. et al. Hemangioma of the mandible: case report with special emphasis on bone degradation. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 13: 239-242.
  • 6 Verstraete FJ. Maxillofacial fractures. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Volume 2. Slatter DH. editor. Philadelphia: Elsevier Science; 2003. pg. 2003-2190.
  • 7 Hale F. Management of bilateral, pathologic, mandibular fractures in a dog. J Vet Dent 2002; 19: 22-24.
  • 8 Bonner SE, Reiter AM, Lewis JR. Orofacial manifestations of high-rise syndrome in cats: a retrospective study of 84 cases. J Vet Dent 2012; 29: 10-18.
  • 9 Vnuk D, Pirkic B, Maticic D. et al. Feline high-rise syndrome:119 cases (1998-2001). J Feline Med Surg 2004; 6: 305-312.
  • 10 Andreas ZJ, Benoit S, Olivier L. et al. Incidence, aetiology and pattern of mandibular fractures in central Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 2011; 1-5.
  • 11 Hart BL, Hart LA. Causes and therapeutic approaches for common behavioral problems: aggressive behavior in dogs. In: Canine and Feline Behavioral Therapy. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1985. pg. 1985-27.
  • 12 Hart BL, Hart LA. Behavioral modification through hormonal manipulation. In: Canine and Feline Behavioral Therapy. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1985. pg. 1985-231.
  • 13 Hart BL, Hart LA. Roaming and escaping in dogs. In: Canine and Feline Behavioral Therapy. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1985. pg. 1985-90.
  • 14 Shamir MH, Leisner S, Klement E. et al. Dog bite wounds in dogs and cats: a retrospective study of 196 cases. J Vet Med 2002; 49: 107-112.
  • 15 Wong T. A survey of fractures in the dog and cat in Malaysia. Vet Rec 1984; 115: 273-274.
  • 16 Kitshoff AM, de Rooster H, Ferreira SM. et al. A retrospective study of 109 dogs with mandibular fractures. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 1-5.
  • 17 Harvey C, Shofer F, Laster L. Association of age and body weight with periodontal disease in North American dogs. J Vet Dent 1994; 11: 94-105.
  • 18 Simpson SA, Syring R, Otto CM. Severe blunt trauma in dogs: 235 cases (1997-2003). J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2009; 19: 588-602.
  • 19 Sherman CK, Reisner IR, Taliaferro LA. et al. Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of 99 cases of aggression between dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1996; 47: 91-108.
  • 20 Wrubel K, Moon-Fanelli AA, Maranda LS. et al. Interdog household aggression: 38 cases (2006-2007). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011; 238: 731-740.
  • 21 Wake A, Minot EO, Stafford KJ. et al. A survey of adult victims of dog bites in New Zealand. N Z Vet J 2009; 57: 364-369.