Effect of tibial subluxation on the measurements for tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament deficiency

M. J. Bielecki; C. S. Schwandt; S. Scharvogel

doi:10.3415/VCOT-14-02-0018

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27(06): 470-477
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-14-02-0018

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

Effect of tibial subluxation on the measurements for tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament deficiency

An ex vivo study

M. J. Bielecki

¹Tierklinik Haar, Haar, Germany

,

C. S. Schwandt

¹Tierklinik Haar, Haar, Germany

,

S. Scharvogel

¹Tierklinik Haar, Haar, Germany

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Objectives: The main objectives were to evaluate the impact of femorotibial subluxation on the preoperative measurements for tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) by defining radiographic landmarks and testing the repeatability for assessing cranial tibial subluxation (CTS). Also, we aimed at developing a formula to calculate the necessary adjustment in measurement of TTA in stifles with CTS.

Methods: Forty stifles were used to examine the influence of CTS on preoperative TTA measurements before and after transection of the cranial cruciate ligament. Mediolateral radiographs were obtained and measurements performed by three investigators. The observed variabilities were assessed by interand intra-observer differences.

Results: Measurements of CTS and preoperative TTA showed a good to excellent interand intra-observer correlation. We found a significant influence of CTS on TTA measurements and developed a formula to calculate the necessary adjustment in measurement of TTA in stifles with CTS.

Conclusion: We found a correlation between the tibial subluxation and the measurements for TTA, with the latter decreasing with increasing subluxation. This has to be taken into account when measuring the advancement in stifles with complete rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. We provided a formula to calculate the necessary addition to the measured advancement.

Keywords

Subluxation - TTA - tibial tuberosity advancement - cranial cruciate ligament rupture - cranial cruciate ligament deficiency - dog

Full Text

References

References
1 Wilke V, Robinson D, Evans R. et al. Estimate of the annual economic impact of treatment of cranial cruciate ligament injury in dogs in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227: 1604-1607.
2 Arnoczky SP. Pathomechanics of cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries. In: Bojrab MJ. editor. Disease Mechanisms in Small Animal Surgery Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1993: 764-777.
3 Johnson JM, Johnson AL. Cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and postoperative rehabilitation. Vet Clin North Am 1993; 23: 717-733.
4 Elkins AD. A retrospective study evaluating the degree of degenerative joint disease in stifle of dogs following surgical repair of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 27: 533-539.
5 Vasseur PB, Berry CR. Progression of stifle osteoarthritis following reconstruction of the cranial cruciate ligament in 21 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1992; 28: 129-136.
6 Stein S, Schmoekel H. Short-term and eight to 12 months results of a tibial tuberosity advancement as treatment of canine cranial cruciate ligament damage. J Sm Anim Pract 2008; 49: 398-404.
7 Dymond NL, Goldsmid SE, Simpson DJ. Tibial tuberosity advancement in 92 canine stifles: initial results, clinical outcome and owner evaluation. Aust Vet J 2010; 88: 381-385.
8 Lafaver S, Miller NA, Stubbs WP. et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement for stabilization of the canine cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joint: surgical technique, early results, and complications in 101 dogs. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 573-586.
9 Steinberg EJ, Prata RG, Palazzini K. et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement for treatment of CrCL injury: complications and owner satisfaction. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2011; 47: 250-257.
10 Hoffmann DE, Miller JM, Ober CP. et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement in 65 Canine Stifles. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 219-227.
11 Nisell R, Németh G, Ohlsén H. Joint forces in the extension of the knee: analysis of a mechanical model. Acta Orthop Scand 1986; 57: 41-46.
12 Tepic S, Montavon PM. Is cranial tibial advancement relevant in the cruciate deficient stifle?. In: Proceedings of the 12th ESVOT Congres 2004. September 10-12 Munich, Germany: 132-133.
13 Tepic S, Damur DM, Montavon PM. Biomechanics of the stifle joint. In: Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopedic Veterinary Congress 2002. September 5-8 Munich, Germany: 189-190.
14 Montavon PM, Damur DM, Tepic S. Advancement of the tibial tuberosity for the treatment of cranial cruciate deficient canine stifle. In: Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopedic Veterinary Congress 2002. September 5-8 Munich, Germany: 152
15 Apelt A, Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ. Effect of tibial tuberosity advancement on cranial tibial subluxation in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifle joints: an in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 170-177.
16 Miller JM, Shires PK, Lanz OI. et al. Effect of 9 mm tibial tuberosity advancement on cranial tibial translation in the canine cruciate ligament-deficient stifle. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 335-340.
17 Kipfer NM, Tepic S, Damur DM. et al. Effect of tibial tuberosity advancement on femoro-tibial shear in cranial cruciate-deficient stifles: an in vitro study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 385-390.
18 Butler JR, Syrcle JA, McLaughlin RM. et al. The effect of tibial tuberosity advancement and meniscal release on kinematics of the cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle during early, middle, and late stance. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 342-349.
19 Dennler R, Kipfer NM, Tepic S. et al. Inclination of the patellar ligament in relation to flexion angle in stifle joints of dogs without degenerative joint disease. Am J Vet Res 2006; 6: 1849-1854.
20 Plesman R, Sharma A, Gilbert P. et al. Radiographic landmarks for measurement of cranial tibial subluxation in the canine cruciate ligament deficient stifle. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 478-487.
21 Caylor KB, Zumpano CA, Evans LM. et al. Intra- and interobserver measurement variability of tibial plateau slope from lateral radiographs in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001; 37: 263-268.
22 Warzee CC, Dejardin LC, Arnoczky SP. et al. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on cranial and caudal tibial thrusts in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifles: an in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 278-286.
23 Grierson J, Sanders M, Guitan J. et al. Comparison of anatomical tibial plateau angle versus observer measurement from lateral radiographs in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 215-219.
24 Baroni E, Matthias RR. Marcellin-Little et al. Comparison of radiographic assessments of the tibial plateau slope in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2003; 61: 586-589.
25 Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and intra-class correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 1973; 2: 113-117.
26 Schwandt CS, Bohorquez-Vanelli A, Tepic S. et al. Angle between the patellar ligament and tibial plateau in dogs with partial rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 1855-1860.
27 Hottinger HA, DeCamp CE, Olivier NB. et al. Non-invasive kinematic analysis of the walk in healthy large-breed dogs. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 381-388.
28 Bush MA, Bowlt K, Gines JA. et al. Effect of use of different landmark methods on determining stifle angle and on calculated tibial tuberosity advancement. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 205-210.
29 Palmer RH. Preoperative planning for TTA. In: Proceedings of the ACVS Veterinary Symposium 2011. 2011.November 1-5 Chicago, IL, USA.: 344-346.
30 Millet M, Bismuth C, Labrunie A. et al. Measurement of the patellar tendon-tibial plateau angle and tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 469-478.
31 Bismuth C, Ferrand FX, Millet M. et al. Comparison of radiographic measurements of the patellar tendon-tibial plateau angle with anatomical measurements in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27: 222-229.
32 Vedrine B, Guillemot A, Fontaine D. et al. Comparative anatomy of the proximal tibia in healthy Labrador Retrievers and Yorkshire Terriers. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 266-270.
33 Ocal MK, Sabanci SS, Onar V. Variation of tibial plateau geometry and cruciate ligament coordinates in six breeds of dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 110-116.
34 Sabanci SS, Ocal MK. Lateral and medial tibial plateau angles in normal dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27: 135-140.
35 Burns CG, Boudrieau RJ. Modified tibial tuberosity advancement procedure with tuberosity advancement in excess of 12 mm in four large breed dogs with cranial cruciate ligament-deficient joints. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 3: 250-255.
36 Fettig AA, Rand WM, Sato AF. et al. Observer variability of tibial plateau slope measurement in 40 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joints. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 417-478.
37 Ritter MJ, Perry RL, Olivier NB. et al. Tibial plateau symmetry and the effect of osteophytosis on tibial plateau angle measurements. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2007; 43: 93-98.
38 Reif U, Déjardin LM, Probst CW. et al. Influence of limb positioning and measurement method on the magnitude of the tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 368-375.