Influence of calibration protocols for a pressure-sensing walkway on kinetic and temporospatial parameters

Summary

Objectives: To evaluate the influence on the kinetic and temporospatial parameters of calibration protocols with point and step techniques for a pressure-sensing walkway.

Methods: Nine Labrador dogs were used. Two protocols of point calibration technique (C1 and C2) and eight protocols of step calibration technique (C3 to C10) were performed. In C1, weight was added to a stool to match the body mass of each dog. In C2, weight was added to the stool to match a 46.1 kg person. The other eight calibration protocols represented combinations of the following factors: 46.1 kg and 96.1 kg persons, barefoot or wearing sneakers, and stepping onto the platform with one or two feet.

Results: The calibration protocols did not affect the temporospatial variables or percentages of body weight (%BW) distribution. Significant differences were found in both PVI (peak vertical force) and VI (vertical impulse) between barefoot versus wearing sneakers, 46.1 kg versus 96.1 kg person, and stepping onto the platform with one foot versus two feet. When comparing C1 with other protocols, significant differences were observed in PVF and VI for both forelimbs and hindlimbs. When comparing C2 with other protocols, significant differences were observed in PVF and VI for both forelimbs and hindlimbs in all protocols.

Clinical significance: The PVF and VI were influenced by the calibration protocol used, but the %BW distribution and temporospatial parameters were not. Using the same calibration protocol for all dogs within the same group eliminated the variability of the kinetic data caused by the calibration.

Keywords

Pressure platform - Tekscan - calibration

• References

• 1 Besancon MF, Conzemius MG, Derrick TR. et al. Comparison of vertical forces in normal Greyhounds between force platform and pressure walkway measurement systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 153-157.
• 2 Besancon MF, Conzemius MG, Evans RB. et al. Distribution of vertical forces in the pads of greyhounds and Labrador retrievers during walking. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65: 1497-1501.
• 3 Horstman CL, Conzemius MG, Evans R. et al. Assessing the efficacy of perioperative oral carprofen after cranial cruciate surgery using noinvasive, objective pressure platform gait analysis. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 286-292.
• 4 Lascelles BD, Roe SC, Smith E. et al. Evaluation of a pressure walkway system for measurement of vertical limb forces in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 227-282.
• 5 LeQuang T, Maitre P, Roger T. et al. Is a pressure walkway system able to highlight a lameness in dog?. J Anim Vet Adv 2009; 8: 1936-1944.
• 6 Gordon-Evans WJ, Evans RB, Conzemius MG. Accuracy of spatiotemporal variables in gait analysis of neurologic dogs. J Neurotrauma 2009; 26: 1055-1060.
• 7 Light VA, Steiss JE, Montgomery RD. et al. Temporal-spatial gait analysis by use of a portable walkway system in healthy Labrador Retrievers at a walk. Am J Vet Res 2010; 71: 997-1002.
• 8 Kim J, Kazmierczak KA, Breur GJ. Comparison of temporospatial and kinetic variables of walking in small and large dogs on a pressure-sensing walkway. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72: 1171-1177.
• 9 Romans CW, Conzemius MG, Horstman CL. et al. Use of pressure platform gait analysis in cats with and without bilateral onychectomy. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65: 1276-1278.
• 10 Romans CW, Gordon WJ, Robinson DA. et al. Effect of postoperative analgesic protocol on limb function following onychectomy in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227: 89-93.
• 11 Lascelles BD, Findley K, Correa M. et al. Kinetic evaluation of normal walking and jumping in cats, using a pressure sensitive walkway. Vet Rec 2007; 160: 512-516.
• 12 Guillot M, Moreau M, D’Anjou M-A. et al. Evaluation of osteoarthritis in cats: novel information from a pilot study. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 328-335.
• 13 Verdugo MR, Rahal SC, Agostinho FS. et al. Kinetic and temporospatial parameters in male and female cats walking over a pressure sensing walkway. BMC Vet Res 2013; 9: 1-7.
• 14 Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Huppes T. et al. Comparison of pressure plate and force plate gait kinetics in sound Warmbloods at walk and trot. Vet J 2010; 186: 347-351.
• 15 Kim J, Breur GJ. Temporospatial and kinetic characteristics of sheep walking on a pressure sensing walkway. Can Vet J 2008; 72: 50-55.
• 16 Agostinho FS, Rahal SC, Araújo FAP. et al. Gait analysis in clinically healthy sheep from three different age groups using a pressure-sensitive walkway. BMC Vet Res 2012; 8: 1-7.
• 17 Meijer E, Bertholle CP, Oosterlinck M. et al. Pressure mat analysis of the longitudinal development of pig locomotion in growing pigs after weaning. BMC Vet Res 2014; 10: 1-11.
• 18 Budsberg SC, Thomas MW. Advanced diagnostic techniques. In Houlton JEF, Cook JL, Innes JF. et al. editors BSVA Manual of Canine and Feline Musculoskeletal Disorders. England: British Small Animal Veterinary Association; 2006: 27-33.
• 19 Tekscan. Walkway TM user manual v.7.0x. Boston: Tekscan; 1998: 243.
• 20 Gillette RL, Angle TC. Recent development in canine locomotor analysis. A review. Vet J 2008; 178: 165-176.
• 21 Brimacombe JM, Wilson DR, Hodgson AJ. et al. Effect of calibration method on Tekscan sensor accuracy. J Biomech Eng 2009; 131: 034503.