PDF herunterladen
Facial Plast Surg 2023; 39(01): 069-076
DOI: 10.1055/a-1979-8636
Original Article

Septorhinoplasty and the Late Impact on Olfactory Function: A Review and Meta-analysis

Francisco Alves de Sousa 
1   Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-facial (Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery), Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
Mariline Santos
1   Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-facial (Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery), Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
João Tavares Correia
1   Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-facial (Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery), Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
Ana Nóbrega Pinto
1   Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-facial (Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery), Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
Luís Meireles
1   Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-facial (Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery), Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
Miguel Ferreira
1   Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-facial (Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery), Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Septorhinoplasty (SRP) is one of the most commonly performed procedures worldwide. There is a recognized debate about the impact of nasal surgery on olfactory function (OF). The study's objective was to assess the effect of SRP on late postoperative OF. A comprehensive review and meta-analysis were employed to assess OF after SRP. All the integrated studies used objective instruments to quantify OF before and after surgery. A literature search was conducted, and the selected works were evaluated, computed, and finally included in a meta-analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the NIH Guidance for Evaluating the Quality of Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group. Only the latest follow-up OF measurements provided by each research were considered in the analysis. The 95% confidence interval of the effect magnitude for each study was calculated to elucidate effect sizes. Eleven studies were included in the analysis. Five studies reported late OF improvement (45.5%), five reported no alteration in OF (45.5%), and only one study reported OF impairment after SRP (9%). Some works described a transitory decline in OF shortly following surgery, followed by postoperative improvement. A pooled meta-analysis showed that OF was not significantly altered after SRP (p = 0.10) in the late follow-up. SRP surgery seems to constitute a safe procedure concerning OF in the long term. According to research, OF may deteriorate temporarily after surgery with later improvement, sometimes to higher values than baseline. The anticipated evolution of OF after intervention could be discussed during the preoperative consultation for SRP.

Keywords

septorhinoplasty - olfaction - smell - nose - surgery


Publikationsverlauf

Accepted Manuscript online:
16. November 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Januar 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. International survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2019. Accessed September 25, 2022 at: https://www.isaps.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2020-Press-release-final.pdf
    PubMed
  • 2 Kokubo LCP, Carvalho TBO, Fornazieri MA, Gomes EMC, Alves CMF, Sampaio ALL. Effects of septorhinoplasty on smell perception. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276 (04) 1247-1250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pfaar O, Hüttenbrink KB, Hummel T. Assessment of olfactory function after septoplasty: a longitudinal study. Rhinology 2004; 42 (04) 195-199
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Temmel AFP, Quint C, Schickinger-Fischer B, Klimek L, Stoller E, Hummel T. Characteristics of olfactory disorders in relation to major causes of olfactory loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128 (06) 635-641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Costanzo RM, DiNardo LJ, Reiter ER. Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 127 (05) 497-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Deems DA, Doty RL, Settle RG. et al. Smell and taste disorders, a study of 750 patients from the University of Pennsylvania Smell and Taste Center. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117 (05) 519-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Altundag A, Salihoglu M, Tekeli H, Saglam M, Cayonu M, Hummel T. Lateralized differences in olfactory function and olfactory bulb volume relate to nasal septum deviation. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (02) 359-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tutar B, Ekincioglu E, Karaketir S. et al. The impact of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on olfactory function and pain after septoplasty operations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277 (04) 1115-1120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Miyake MM, Miyamura BV, Grunewald RE. et al. Avaliação do olfato de pacientes submetidos à septoplastia e rinoseptoplastia no Hospital Central Santa Casa de São Paulo. Accessed September 26, 2022 at: http://arquivosmedicos.fcmsantacasasp.edu.br/index.php/AMSCSP/article/view/99
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gupta N, Singh PP, Bagla RK. Will septal correction surgery for deviated nasal septum improve the sense of smell? A prospective study. Surg Res Pract 2015; 2015: 496542
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Damm M, Eckel HE, Jungehülsing M, Hummel T. Olfactory changes at threshold and suprathreshold levels following septoplasty with partial inferior turbinectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003; 112 (01) 91-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Valsamidis K, Printza A, Titelis K, Constantinidis J, Triaridis S. Olfaction and quality of life in patients with nasal septal deviation treated with septoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol 2019; 40 (05) 747-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Aydoğdu I, Atar Y, Aydoğdu Z. et al. Comparison of olfactory function and quality of life with different surgical techniques for nasal septum deviation. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) 433-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hummel T, Hüttenbrink KB. Olfactory dysfunction due to nasal sinus disease. Causes, consequences, epidemiology, and therapy [in German]. HNO 2005; 53 (Suppl. 01) S26-S32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Knight LD, Presnell SE. Death by sewer gas: case report of a double fatality and review of the literature. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2005; 26 (02) 181-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Menon C, Westervelt HJ, Jahn DR, Dressel JA, O'Bryant SE. Normative performance on the Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT) in a multi-ethnic bilingual cohort: a Project FRONTIER study. Clin Neuropsychol 2013; 27 (06) 946-961
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Veyseller B, Ozucer B, Karaaltin AB. et al. Connecticut (CCCRC) olfactory test: normative values in 426 healthy volunteers. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 66 (01) 31-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rumeau C, Nguyen DT, Jankowski R. How to assess olfactory performance with the Sniffin' Sticks test(®). Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2016; 133 (03) 203-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Champion R. Anosmia associated with corrective rhinoplasty. Br J Plast Surg 1966; 19 (02) 182-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. NIH Study Quality Assessment Tools: Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group. Bethesda: NIH. Accessed September 25, 2022 at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
    PubMed
  • 21 Randhawa PS, Watson N, Lechner M, Ritchie L, Choudhury N, Andrews PJ. The outcome of septorhinoplasty surgery on olfactory function. Clin Otolaryngol 2016; 41 (01) 15-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Murad MH, Wang Z, Chu H, Lin L. When continuous outcomes are measured using different scales: guide for meta-analysis and interpretation. BMJ 2019; 364: k4817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J. et al, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Accessed September 25, 2022 at: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Elbistanli MS, Koçak HE, Çelik M. et al. Significance of medial osteotomy on the olfactory function in patients who underwent septorhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) e106-e109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ulusoy S, Dinç ME, Dalğıç A, Dizdar D, Avınçsal MÖ, Külekçi M. Effects of Spreader Grafts on Olfactory Function in Septorhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2016; 40 (01) 106-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Briner HR, Simmen D, Jones N. Impaired sense of smell in patients with nasal surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003; 28 (05) 417-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Shemshadi H, Azimian M, Onsori MA, Azizabadi Farahani M. Olfactory function following open rhinoplasty: a 6-month follow-up study. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2008; 8 (01) 6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Razmpa E, Saedi B, Safavi A, Mohammadi S. Olfactory function after nasal plastic surgery. B-ENT 2013; 9 (04) 269-275
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dengiz R, Haytoğlu S, Görgülü O, Doğru M, Arıkan OK. Effect of septorhinoplasty on olfactory function: assessment using the brief smell identification test. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 53 (01) 4-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Türk B, Akpinar M, Altundağ A, Kirik MÖ, Ünsal Ö, Coşkun BU. The effect of external approach septoplasty on olfactory function. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28 (07) 1675-1678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Mohebbi A, Yarahmadi A. Association between satisfaction with nasal appearance and olfactory function in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty surgery. Arch Iran Med 2022; 25 (05) 314-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Stephenson M, Aromataris E. Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness. Int J Evid-Based Healthc 2015; 13 (03) 196-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sousa FA, Machado AS, da Costa JC. et al. Tailored Approach for Persistent Olfactory Dysfunction After SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Pilot Study [published online ahead of print, 2022 Jul 12]. DOI: 10.1177/00034894221111093.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Grabosky A, Mackers P, Langdon C, Alobid I. Change in olfactory function after septoplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rhinology 2021; 59 (02) 144-150
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Pfaff MJ, Bertrand AA, Lipman KJ. et al. The effect of functional nasal surgery on olfactory function. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (03) 707-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Dalgic A, Is A, Dinc ME, Ulusoy S, Avinçsal MÖ, Kulekci M. The effects of nasal packing and transseptal suturing after septoplasty on olfactory function, patient comfort, and mucociliary clearance. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (05) e487-e490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kilicaslan A, Acar GO, Tekin M, Ozdamar OI. Assessment the long-term effects of septoplasty surgery on olfactory function. Acta Otolaryngol 2016; 136 (10) 1079-1084
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Haytoğlu S, Dengiz R, Muluk NB, Kuran G, Arikan OK. Effects of septoplasty on olfactory function evaluated by the Brief Smell Identification Test: a study of 116 patients. Ear Nose Throat J 2017; 96 (10-11): 433-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Svider PF, Mauro AC, Eloy JA, Setzen M, Carron MA, Folbe AJ. Malodorous consequences: what comprises negligence in anosmia litigation?. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014; 4 (03) 216-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Berkiten G, Kumral TL, Saltürk Z. et al. Effect of deviated nasal septum type on nasal mucociliary clearance, olfactory function, quality of life, and efficiency of nasal surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (05) 1151-1155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Tsang CLN, Nguyen T, Sivesind T, Cervin A. Long-term patient-related outcome measures of septoplasty: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 275 (05) 1039-1048
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Zarabanda D, Vukkadala N, Phillips KM. et al. The effect of povidone-iodine nasal spray on nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 viral load: a randomized control trial. Laryngoscope 2022; 132 (11) 2089-2095
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Elsersy HE, Zahran MAH, Elbakry AE. et al. Combined nasal, oropharyngeal povidone iodine plus glycyrrhizic acid sprays, accelerate clinical and laboratory recovery and reduces household transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9: 863917
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar