Eur J Pediatr Surg 2024; 34(01): 056-062
DOI: 10.1055/a-2123-5214
Original Article

Can We Do Anything Else before Removing a Button Battery from the Esophagus?—Hyaluronic Acid

1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
,
M.D. Blanco Verdú
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
,
J.A. Cerdá
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
,
M. Fanjul
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
,
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
,
M.M. Tolín Hernani
2   Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
,
C. Miranda Cid
2   Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
,
C. Sánchez Sánchez
2   Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
,
J.C. De Agustín
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective This article tests the protective effect of a commercially available mixture of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate, and poloxamer 407 on the damage caused by the exposure of esophageal mucosa to button batteries in an animal model.

Methods Experimental study. Sixty porcine esophageal samples were distributed in three groups: control (CG), exposure (EG), and exposure-protection (EPG). In EG and EPG, one CR2032 button battery per sample was inserted, both were subdivided into 2-, 4-, 6-, and 24-hour exposure subgroups, with subsequent battery removal. EPG samples were irrigated with the solution 1 hour after battery exposure. Esophageal pH and final voltage of the battery were measured.

Results pH in CG remained stable. No significant differences in pH at 1 hour were found between EG and EPG. In EPG, the pH of the mucosa exposed to the anode was lower than in GE at 2 hours (12.44 vs. 11.89, p = 0.203) and 4 hours (13.78 vs. 11.77, p < 0.0001). In the cathode pH was significantly higher in EG at 2 hours (2.5 vs. 4.11, p < 0.0001), 4 hours (2.33 vs. 4.78, p < 0.0001), and 6 hours (2.17 vs. 2.91, p < 0.0001). Significant voltage reduction at 1 hour was found in EG compared to EPG (0.48 vs. 1.08 V, p = 0.004).

Conclusion Exposure to hyaluronic acid solution buffers the acidification on the side exposed to the cathode and basification on the anode. This effect can be maintained up to 3 to 5 hours, even after stopping its application. Our results suggest that a solution containing hyaluronic acid could be used as an esophageal protector after accidental ingestion of button batteries.

Declaration

No live animals were used or sacrificed for this experiment. The animals were authorized for a hemodynamics study and after their euthanasia they were employed for our study. Therefore, no ethical approval was required by the Ethics Committee in our center.




Publication History

Received: 29 March 2023

Accepted: 04 July 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
05 July 2023

Article published online:
09 August 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Jatana KR, Litovitz T, Reilly JS, Koltai PJ, Rider G, Jacobs IN. Pediatric button battery injuries: 2013 task force update. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 77 (09) 1392-1399
  • 2 Lerner DG, Brumbaugh D, Lightdale JR, Jatana KR, Jacobs IN, Mamula P. Mitigating risks of swallowed button batteries: new strategies before and after removal. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2020; 70 (05) 542-546
  • 3 Sethia R, Gibbs H, Jacobs IN, Reilly JS, Rhoades K, Jatana KR. Current management of button battery injuries. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2021; 6 (03) 549-563
  • 4 Kramer RE, Lerner DG, Lin T. et al; North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Endoscopy Committee. Management of ingested foreign bodies in children: a clinical report of the NASPGHAN Endoscopy Committee. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015; 60 (04) 562-574
  • 5 Mubarak A, Benninga MA, Broekaert I. et al. Diagnosis, management, and prevention of button battery ingestion in childhood: a European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition Position Paper. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2021; 73 (01) 129-136
  • 6 Haddad N, Wilson JD, Fard D, Levi JR. Pediatric button battery ingestion: publication trends in the literature. Am J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Med Surg 2020; 41 (03) 102401
  • 7 Jatana KR, Rhoades K, Milkovich S, Jacobs IN. Basic mechanism of button battery ingestion injuries and novel mitigation strategies after diagnosis and removal. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (06) 1276-1282
  • 8 Völker J, Völker C, Schendzielorz P. et al. Pathophysiology of esophageal impairment due to button battery ingestion. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 100 (100) 77-85
  • 9 Jia W, Zhang B, Xu G. et al. Edible oils attenuate button battery-induced injury in porcine esophageal segments. Front Pediatr 2020; 8 (March): 97
  • 10 Anfang RR, Jatana KR, Linn RL, Rhoades K, Fry J, Jacobs IN. pH-neutralizing esophageal irrigations as a novel mitigation strategy for button battery injury. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (01) 49-57
  • 11 National Capital Poison Center. . Button battery ingestion triage and treatment guideline. Accessed on December 1, 2022, at: https://www.poison.org/battery/guideline
  • 12 Russell RT, Griffin RL, Weinstein E, Billmire DF. Esophageal button battery ingestions: decreasing time to operative intervention by level I trauma activation. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (09) 1360-1362