Kardiologische Rehabilitation

Die kardiologische Rehabilitation (KardReha) hat das Ziel, die individuell bestmögliche physische und psychische Gesundheit kardiovaskulär erkrankter Patienten durch die Therapie in einem multidisziplinären Team wiederherzustellen, nachhaltig zu stabilisieren und die berufliche und soziale Re-Integration zu ermöglichen. Die KardReha sollte daher integraler Bestandteil einer am langfristigen Erfolg orientierten Behandlung sein [1] [2] [3] [4].

Abstract

A scientific guideline has been developed to update and harmonize exercise based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in German speaking countries of Europe. It addresses all aspects of CR including indications, contents and delivery. Four meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic effect of CR after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), after coronary bypass grafting (CABG), in patients with systolic heart failure (HFrEF), and to define the effect of psychological interventions during CR. Other indications for CR were based on a predefined semi-structured literature search and recommendations were established by a formal consenting process. CR is associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality in patients after ACS and CABG, whereas HFrEF-patients benefit in terms of exercise capacity and health-related quality of life. Patients with other cardiovascular diseases such as heart valve surgery or intervention, adults with congenital heart disease and peripheral arterial disease also benefit from CR-participation, but the scientific evidence is less clear. There is increasing evidence that the beneficial effect of CR strongly depends on “treatment intensity” including medical supervision, modulation of cardiovascular risk factors, information and education, and a minimum of individually adapted exercise volume. Additional psychologic interventions (PI) should be performed on the basis of individual needs. There was a trend towards reduction of depressive symptoms for “distress management” and “lifestyle changes” for PI. Patient education is able to increase patients` knowledge and motivation as well as behavior changes regarding physical activity, dietary habits and smoking cessation. Diversity-sensitive structures should be established to interact with the needs of special patient groups and gender issues. This guideline reinforces the substantial benefit of CR in specific cardiac indications, and it points out the minimal therapeutic needs in CR-delivery.

Schlüsselwörter

kardiologische Rehabilitation - Leitlinie - evidenzbasierte Medizin - koronare Herzkrankheit - Herzinsuffizienz

Keywords

cardiac rehabilitation - guideline - evidence based medicine - coronary heart disease - congestive heart failure

Publication History

Article published online:
08 October 2024

• Literatur

• 1 AWMF. S3-Leitlinie zur kardiologischen Rehabilitation (LL-KardReha) im deutschsprachigen Raum Europas Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz (D-A-CH). 2020. AWMF-Registernummer 133-001. Im Internet https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/133-001.html Stand: 02.10.2022
• 2 Rauch B, Salzwedel A, Bjarnason-Wehrens B. et al. Cardiac Rehabilitation in German Speaking Countries of Europe – Evidence-Based Guidelines from Germany, Austria and Switzerland LLKardReha-DACH – Part 1. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 2192
• 3 Schwaab B, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Meng K. et al. Cardiac Rehabilitation in German Speaking Countries of Europe – Evidence-Based Guidelines from Germany, Austria and Switzerland LLKardReha-DACH – Part 2. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 3071
• 4 Schwaab B. Kardiologische Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 2022; 61: 395-407
• 5 Rauch B, Davos CH, Doherty P. et al. The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies – The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS). Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 1914-1939
• 6 Salzwedel A, Jensen K, Rauch B. et al. Effectiveness of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients treated according to contemporary evidence based medicine: Update of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS-II). Eur J Prev Cardiol 2020; 27: 1756-1774
• 7 McDonagh T, Metra M, Adamo M. et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2021; 42: 3599-3726
• 8 Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Nebel R, Jensen K. et al. for the German Society of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (DGPR). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study in Heart Failure (CROS-HF): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2020; 27: 929-952
• 9 Schwaab B, Henke N, Guha M et al. Kardiologische Rehabilitation bei Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz. Kardiologie 2023; 17: 161–172
• 10 Butter C, Groß J, Haase-Fielitz A. et al. Impact of rehabilitation on outcomes after TAVI: a preliminary study. J Clin Med 2018; 7: 326
• 11 Patel D, Duncan M, Shah A. et al. Association of cardiac rehabilitation with decreased hospitalization and mortality risk after cardiac valve surgery. JAMA Cardiol 2019; 4: 1250-1259
• 12 Schwaab B, Rauch B, Völler H. et al. Beyond randomised studies: recommendations for cardiac rehabilitation following repair of thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2022; 28: e17-e19
• 13 Schwaab B, Kindermann I, Bjarnason-Wehrens B. et al. Viral myocarditis: a forbidden indication for cardiac rehabilitation?. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2021;
• 14 Kitzman D, Whellan D, Duncan P. et al. Physical Rehabilitation for Older Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure. New Engl J Med 2021; 385: 203-216
• 15 Schwaab B. Studienkommentar zu D. Kitzman et al. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2022; 147: 10-11
• 16 Albus C, Herrmann-Lingen C, Jensen K. et al. for the German Society of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (DGPR). Additional effects of psychological interventions on subjective and objective outcomes compared with exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation alone in patients with cardiovascular disease (MAPSY): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019; 26: 1035-1049
• 17 Wilson K, Gibson N, Willan A. et al. Effect of smoking cessation on mortality after myocardial infarction: meta-analysis of cohort studies. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 939-944
• 18 Biery D, Berman A, Singh A. et al. Association of Smoking Cessation and Survival Among Young Adults With Myocardial Infarction in the Partners YOUNG-MI Registry. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e209649
• 19 Neczypor E, Mears M, Ghosh A. et al. E-Cigarettes and Cardiopulmonary Health: Review for Clinicians. Circulation 2022; 145: 219-232
• 20 Deutsche Herzstiftung e.V. Deutscher Herzbericht 2019. Kap. 7: KardReha. Im Internet https://www.herzstiftung.de/system/files/2020-11/DHB19_Herzbericht_2019.pdf Stand: 02.10.2022
• 21 Wienbergen H, Schwaab B, Bjarnason-Wehrens B. et al. Ärztliche Betreuung von ambulanten Herzgruppen. Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie–Herz-und Kreislaufforschung (DGK) in Kooperation mit der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Prävention und Rehabilitation von HerzKreislauferkrankungen (DGPR). Kardiologe 2021; 15: 11-18