Tierallergie

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Tierallergien sind ein häufiges und relevantes Thema in der allergologischen Praxis. 69 % der deutschen Haushalte mit Kindern besitzen ein Haustier. Fast 13 % aller Kinder sind gegen Haustiere sensibilisiert. Viele dieser Sensibilisierungen sind jedoch klinisch nicht relevant. Durch eine gute Anamnese und mithilfe moderner diagnostischer Methoden ist es möglich, das auslösende Tier genauer zu identifizieren und die Relevanz zu klären. Klare und differenzierte Meidungsempfehlungen können die Allergenlast in der Umgebung der Patienten senken.

Leider sind viele Fragen zur Tierallergie offen und etablierte Therapieempfehlungen fehlen. In diesem Artikel werden verschiedene Optionen zur Diagnostik und Therapie vorgestellt.

ABSTRACT

Pet allergies are a frequent and relevant topic in allergological practice. 69 % of German households with children own a pet. Almost 13 % of all children are sensitized to pets. However, many of these sensitizations are not clinically relevant. Through a good medical history and with the help of modern diagnostic methods it is possible to identify the triggering animal more precisely and to clarify the relevance. Clear and differentiated avoidance recommendations can reduce the allergen load in the patient’s environment.

Unfortunately, many questions about pet allergy are unanswered and established treatment recommendations are lacking. In this article, different options for diagnosis and therapy are presented.

Schlüsselwörter

Tierallergie - Diagnostik - Therapie - Allergenmeidung

Keywords

Pet allergy - diagnostics - therapy - allergen avoidance

Publication History

Article published online:
10 June 2024

• Literatur

• 1 Schmitz R, Ellert U, Kalcklösch M. et al Patterns of Sensitization to Inhalant and Food Allergens – Findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2013; 162: 263-270 DOI: 10.1159/000353344.
• 2 Kanchongkittiphon W, Sheehan WJ, Friedlander J. et al Allergens on desktop surfaces in preschools and elementary schools of urban children with asthma. Allergy 2014; 69: 960-963
• 3 Berge M, Munir AK, Dreborg S. Concentrations of cat (Fel d1), dog (Can f1) and mite (Der f1 and Der p1) allergens in the clothing and school environment of Swedish schoolchildren with and without pets at home. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 1998; 09: 25-30
• 4 Käck U, Azarnoj A, Grönlund H. et al Molecular allergy diagnostics refine characterization of children sensitized to dog dander. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 142: 1113-1120.e9
• 5 Custovic A, Hallam CL, Simpson BM. et al Decreased prevalence to cats with high exposure to cat allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001; 108: 537-539
• 6 Hesselmar B, Hicke-Roberts A, Lundell AC. et al Pet-keeping in early life reduces the risk of allergy in a dose-dependent fashion. PLoS ONE 2018; 13 (12) e0208472
• 7 Erwin EA, Woodfolk JA, James HR. et al Changes in cat specific IgE and IgG with decreased cat exposure. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014; 112: 545-550
• 8 Renand A, Archila LD, McGinty J. et al Chronic cat allergen exposure induces a TH2 cell-dependent IgG4 response related to low sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 136: 1627-1635
• 9 Hilger C, Janssen-Weets B. Diagnostik der Tierhaarallergie. Pädiatrische Allergologie 2023; 03: 6-10
• 10 Wood RA, Chapmann MD, Adkinson NF, Eggleston PA. The effect of cat removal on allergen content in household-dust samples. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989; 83: 730-734
• 11 Poole TB, King SP, Sophioglu C. Effectiveness of vacuuming and carpet washing in the removal of the major cat allergen, Fel d 1. Allergy 2020; 75: 2694-2695
• 12 Maya-Manzano JM, Pusch G, Ebner von Eschenbach C. et al Effect of air filtration on house dust mite, cat and dog allergens and particulate matter in homes. Clin Transl Allergy 2022: e12137 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12137
• 13 Avner DB, Perzanowski MS, Platts-Mills TAE, Woodfolk JA. Evaluation of different techniques for washing cats: Quantitation of allergen removed from the cat and the effect on airborne Fel d 1. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 100: 307-312
• 14 Björnsdottir US, Jakobinudottir S, Runarsdottir V, Juliusson S. The effect of reducing levels of cat allergen (Fel d 1) on clinical symptoms in patients with cat allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2003; 91: 189-194
• 15 Davila I, Dominguez-Ortega J, Navarro-Pulido A. et al Consensus document on dog and cat allergy. Allergy 2018; 73: 1206-1222
• 16 Lockey RF. The myth of hypoallergenic dogs (and cats). J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 130: 910-911
• 17 Schoos AM, Chawes BL, Bloch J. et al Children monosensitized to Can f 5 show different reactions to male and female dog allergen extract provocation: a randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020; 08: 1592-1597
• 18 Hemmer W, Sestak-Greinecker G, Braunsteiner T. et al Molecular sensitization patterns in animal allergy: Relationship with clinical relevance and pet ownership. Allergy 2021; 76: 3687-3696
• 19 Dhami S, Agarwal A. Does evidence support the use of cat allergen immunotherapy?. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 18: 350-355
• 20 Steinberg JA. The curious history behind a biologic-enriched cat food: Hyperimmune avian IgY as a means of oral adoptive passive immunization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 148: 1473-1475
• 21 Satyaraj E, Wedner HJ, Bousquet J. Keep the cat, change the care pathway: A transformational approach to managing Fel d 1, the major cat allergen. Allergy 2019; 74 (Suppl. 107) 5-17