PDF herunterladen
Eur J Pediatr Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2310-9985
Original Article

The Top Ranked 101 Articles in Pediatric Surgical Journals from an Altmetric Perspective

Boshen Shu
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
Jan Riedel
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
Martin Lacher
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
Steffi Mayer
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
› Institutsangaben Funding B. S. received a scholarship from China Scholarship Council (CSC) [grant number: 202108080166]
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Introduction In the era of scientific digitalization, online media platforms gain increasing popularity to accomplish research output awareness. The Altmetric Attention Score AAS weights these online mentions based on a privy algorithm. We aimed to characterize the top 100 articles with the highest (AAS) published in pediatric surgery journals.

Materials and Methods Publications from six core pediatric surgery journals were retrieved from www.altmetric.com in January 2023 and ranked by their AAS. The top 101 publications were analyzed for their bibliometric measures, study design, and quality as well as online media mentions.

Results The top 101 AAS articles were published between 1974 and 2022, preferentially from the United States (64%) and mainly in Journal of Pediatric Surgery (73%), followed by Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports, Pediatric Surgery International, Seminars in Pediatric Surgery, and European Journal of Pediatric Surgery. Their AAS ranged between 21 and 389 (median: 33), with Twitter/X being mostly responsible for online mentions (n = 2,189; 75%). The number of citations in peer-reviewed journals ranged between 0 and 358 (median: 16) and did not correlate to AAS. Retrospective study design (33%) with low evidence level IV (43%) dominated.

Conclusion The Journal of Pediatric Surgery is the main source of high-profile AAS publications in pediatric surgery. The altmetric popularity of articles is predominantly achieved by their propagation via X, irrespective of the study quality and recognition in the scientific community. Thus, active “twitterism” may play the key role to reach high AAS scores.

Keywords

pediatric surgery - Altmetric Attention Score - online media - level of evidence - Twitter/X


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 30. Januar 2024

Angenommen: 19. April 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
23. April 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. Mai 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 García-Villar C. A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor?. Insights Imaging 2021; 12 (01) 92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Elmore SA. The Altmetric Attention Score: what does it mean and why should I care?. Toxicol Pathol 2018; 46 (03) 252-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Saud S, Traboco L, Gupta L. Harnessing the true power of altmetrics to track engagement. J Korean Med Sci 2021; 36 (48) e330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Dixon DL, Baker WL. Long-term association of Altmetric Attention Scores with citations in selected major pharmacy journals. Am J Pharm Educ 2022; 86 (02) ajpe8606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Trueger NS, Thoma B, Hsu CH, Sullivan D, Peters L, Lin M. The Altmetric Score: a new measure for article-level dissemination and impact. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 66 (05) 549-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Thacker PD. Covid-19: researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer's vaccine trial. BMJ 2021; 375: n2635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Feng X, Martynov I, Suttkus A, Lacher M, Mayer S. Publication trends and global collaborations on esophageal atresia research: a bibliometric study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2021; 31 (02) 164-171
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Martynov I, Feng X, Duess JW, Gosemann JH, Lacher M, Mayer S. Global development of research on anorectal malformations over the last five decades: a bibliometric analysis. Children (Basel) 2022; 9 (02) 253
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Shu B, Feng X, Martynov I, Lacher M, Mayer S. Pediatric minimally invasive surgery-a bibliometric study on 30 years of research activity. Children (Basel) 2022; 9 (08) 1264
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Collins CS, Singh NP, Ananthasekar S, Boyd CJ, Brabston E, King TW. The correlation between altmetric score and traditional bibliometrics in orthopaedic literature. J Surg Res 2021; 268: 705-711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ortega JL. Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric, PlumX and Crossref Event Data. Scientometrics 2018; 116 (03) 2123-2138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Fernandez N, Puerto A, Azuero A. et al. Historical bibliometric analysis of the top cited articles on vesicoureteral reflux 1950-2016, and incorporation of a novel impact index. J Pediatr Urol 2018; 14 (05) 446.e1-446.e9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cashin MS, Kelley SP, Douziech JR, Varghese RA, Hamilton QP, Mulpuri K. The levels of evidence in pediatric orthopaedic journals: where are we now?. J Pediatr Orthop 2011; 31 (06) 721-725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med 2016; 21 (04) 125-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (01) 305-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL. et al; Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet 2012; 380 (9838) 272-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Forte H, Lopes Soares CE, Maria de Holanda Góes Bezerra M, de Araujo Verdiano V, Honorio RS, das Chagas Barros Brilhante F. A true human tail in neonate. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep 2021; 66: 101801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Boi-Dsane NAA, Seidu AS, Owusu SA. Post-operative ileo-ileal intussusception one week after hemicolectomy for ileo-colic intussusception. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep 2023; 88: 102506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (06) 877-881
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Brigham TJ. An introduction to altmetrics. Med Ref Serv Q 2014; 33 (04) 438-447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Civilette MD, Rate WR, Haislup BD. et al. The top 100 most impactful articles on the anterior cruciate ligament: an altmetric analysis of online media. SAGE Open Med 2022; 10: 20 503121221111694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Costas R, Mongeon P, Ferreira MR, van Honk J, Franssen T. Large-scale identification and characterization of scholars on Twitter. Quant Sci Stud 2020; 1 (02) 771-791
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ribal Caparros M. Social Media and Medical Journals: A Promising Relationship?. Urol Colomb 2018; 27 (03) 201-202
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Illingworth CM. Trapped fingers and amputated finger tips in children. J Pediatr Surg 1974; 9 (06) 853-858
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Yorlets RR, Busa K, Eberlin KR. et al. Fingertip injuries in children: epidemiology, financial burden, and implications for prevention. Hand (N Y) 2017; 12 (04) 342-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sezer HB, Bohu Y, Hardy A, Lefevre N, Sezer A. Relationship of Altmetric Attention Score, Twitter performance, and dimensions badge value with traditional metrics in top-cited anterior cruciate ligament research studies. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11 (05) 23 259671231166701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cai LZ, Soares R, Nahar A. et al. Twitter use by ophthalmology journals and its impact on citations. JFO Open Ophthalmol 2023; 2: 100024
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Civilette MD, Rate WR, Haislup BD. et al. The top 100 most impactful articles on the anterior cruciate ligament: an altmetric analysis of online media. SAGE Open Med 2022; 10: 20 503121221111694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Parrish JM, Jenkins NW, Brundage TS, Hrynewycz NM, Singh K. The top 100 spine surgery articles on social media: an altmetric study. Spine 2020; 45 (17) 1229-1238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Erskine N, Hendricks S. The use of Twitter by medical journals: systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23 (07) e26378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Chang J, Desai N, Gosain A. Correlation between Altmetric score and citations in pediatric surgery core journals. J Surg Res 2019; 243: 52-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hayon S, Tripathi H, Stormont IM, Dunne MM, Naslund MJ, Siddiqui MM. Twitter mentions and academic citations in the urologic literature. Urology 2019; 123: 28-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Tufekci Z. Big questions for social media big data: representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media; 2014; 8 (01) 505-514
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR. Do Altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One 2013; 8 (05) e64841
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Studenic P, Ospelt C. Do you tweet?: trailing the connection between Altmetric and research impact!. RMD Open 2020; 6 (03) e001034
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13 (04) e123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Khalid MA, Verma A, Kazan O, Chen J. Twitter use among orthopedic surgery journals correlates with increased citation rates. Orthopedics 2023; 46 (01) e38-e44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Ozkent MS, Böcü K, Altintas E, Gul M. Correlation between Twitter mentions and academic citations in sexual medicine journals. Int J Impot Res 2022; 34 (06) 593-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Wang J, Alotaibi NM, Ibrahim GM, Kulkarni AV, Lozano AM. The spectrum of Altmetrics in neurosurgery: the top 100 “trending” articles in neurosurgical journals. World Neurosurg 2017; 103: 883-895.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Mullins CH, Boyd CJ, Corey BL. Examining the correlation between Altmetric score and citations in the general surgery literature. J Surg Res 2020; 248: 159-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Xu S. Issues in the interpretation of “Altmetrics” digital traces: a review. Front Res Metr Anal 2018; 3 DOI: 10.3389/frma.2018.00029.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Chi AJ, Lopes AJ, Rong LQ, Charlson ME, Alvarez RD, Boerner T. Examining the correlation between Altmetric Attention Score and citation count in the gynecologic oncology literature: Does it have an impact?. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2021; 37: 100778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Nocera AP, Boyd CJ, Boudreau H, Hakim O, Rais-Bahrami S. Examining the correlation between Altmetric score and citations in the urology literature. Urology 2019; 134: 45-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Bornmann L, Haunschild R. Normalization of zero-inflated data: an empirical analysis of a new indicator family and its use with altmetrics data. J Informetr 2018; 12 (03) 998-1011
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Di Girolamo N, Reynders RM. Health care articles with simple and declarative titles were more likely to be in the Altmetric Top 100. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 85: 32-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Noah A, Pearce I, Modgil V. Altmetrics and citations: the impact of journal publications. Bull R Coll Surg Engl 2020; 102 (07) 324-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Ramamurti P, Gu A, Fassihi SC. et al. Correlation between Altmetric score and traditional bibliometrics in total joint arthroplasty research. Arthroplast Today 2021; 7: 225-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Bornmann L, Haunschild R. Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data. PLoS One 2018; 13 (05) e0197133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Meschede C, Siebenlist T. Cross-metric compatability and inconsistencies of altmetrics. Scientometrics 2018; 115 (01) 283-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Cabrera D, Roy D, Chisolm MS. Social media scholarship and alternative metrics for academic promotion and tenure. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (1 Pt B): 135-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Jamison AM, Broniatowski DA, Quinn SC. Malicious actors on Twitter: a guide for public health researchers. Am J Public Health 2019; 109 (05) 688-692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar