Temporary Nasal Morbidity after Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Skull Base Tumors

Abstract

Objectives To assess olfactory dysfunction and quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for skull base tumors.

Design Prospective observational study of patients undergoing expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior skull base and pituitary lesions from 2018 to 2019.

Setting Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Participants A total of 29 consecutive patients who underwent expanded endoscopic endonasal approach.

Main Outcome Measures Olfactory function and QOL were assessed using Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Centre olfaction test and Sino Nasal Outcome Test 22 questionnaire, respectively, preoperatively and at the 2nd week and 3rd month postoperative follow-up.

Results Olfaction scores significantly worsened in the 2 weeks postoperative period compared with the preoperative scores. By 3rd postoperative month 48% of the patients returned to baseline, 48% had only mild hyposmia, and only 1 patient had persistent moderate hyposmia. QOL scores significantly worsened in the immediate postoperative period and although they improved over 3 months, they did not reach baseline.

Conclusion Expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches to the anterior skull base cause transient olfactory dysfunction and nasal morbidity in the immediate postoperative period. Although olfactory function and QOL scores improved in the majority of patients, at least 50% had mild residual dysfunction at 3 months postoperatively. Olfactory epithelium-preserving surgical techniques, adequate endoscopic nasal cleaning postoperatively, and good nasal douching are factors that help improve olfactory function postoperatively.

Keywords

olfaction - nasal morbidity - expanded endoscopic surgery - SNOT-22 - skull base surgery

Publication History

Received: 27 May 2024

Accepted: 07 November 2024

Article published online:
05 December 2024

• References

• 1 Wallace ZS, Zhang Y, Perugino CA, Naden R, Choi HK, Stone JH. ACR/EULAR IgG4-RD Classification Criteria Committee. Clinical phenotypes of IgG4-related disease: an analysis of two international cross-sectional cohorts. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78 (03) 406-412
• 2 Hadley K, Orlandi RR, Fong KJ. Basic anatomy and physiology of olfaction and taste. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2004; 37 (06) 1115-1126
• 3 de Almeida JR, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Carrau RL, Vescan AD. Nasal morbidity following endoscopic skull base surgery: a prospective cohort study. Head Neck 2011; 33 (04) 547-551
• 4 Alobid I, Enseñat J, Mariño-Sánchez F. et al. Impairment of olfaction and mucociliary clearance after expanded endonasal approach using vascularized septal flap reconstruction for skull base tumors. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (04) 540-546
• 5 Cain WS, Gent JF, Goodspeed RB, Leonard G. Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center. Laryngoscope 1988; 98 (01) 83-88
• 6 Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxf) 2005; 27 (03) 281-291
• 7 De Leeuw E. Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys [Doctoral dissertation]. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit; 1992
• 8 Solari D, D'Avella E, Bove I, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM. Extended endonasal approaches for pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg Sci 2021; 65 (02) 160-168
• 9 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL. et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
• 10 Dolci RLL, de Carvalho ACM, Rickli JCK. et al. Relationship between the bilateral removal of the middle nasal turbinate and the olfactory function in endoscopic skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 2020; 142: e337-e343
• 11 Kim BY, Kang SG, Kim SW. et al. Olfactory changes after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for skull base tumors. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (11) 2470-2475
• 12 Upadhyay S, Buohliqah L, Dolci RLL, Otto BA, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. Periodic olfactory assessment in patients undergoing skull base surgery with preservation of the olfactory strip. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (09) 1970-1975
• 13 Hart CK, Theodosopoulos PV, Zimmer LA. Olfactory changes after endoscopic pituitary tumor resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 142 (01) 95-97
• 14 Carvalho ACM, Dolci RLL, Rickli JCK. et al. Evaluation of olfactory function in patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery with nasoseptal flap. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 88 (01) 15-21
• 15 Zimmer LA, Shah O, Theodosopoulos PV. Short-term quality-of-life changes after endoscopic pituitary surgery rated with SNOT-22. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75 (04) 288-292
• 16 Harvey RJ, Winder M, Davidson A. et al The Olfactory Strip and Its Preservation in Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery Maintains Smell and Sinonasal Function. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (06) 464-470
• 17 Pant H, Bhatki AM, Snyderman CH. et al. Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery. Skull Base 2010; 20 (01) 35-40
• 18 Balaker AE, Bergsneider M, Martin NA, Wang MB. Evolution of sinonasal symptoms following endoscopic anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base 2010; 20 (04) 245-251
• 19 Hong SD, Nam DH, Seol HJ. et al. Endoscopic binostril versus transnasal transseptal microscopic pituitary surgery: sinonasal quality of life and olfactory function. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2015; 29 (03) 221-225
• 20 Rioja E, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Enriquez K. et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach for skull base surgery: a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (07) 1809-1817