Download PDF
Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2512-9531
Original Article

High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Postnatal Growth and Feeding in Preterm Infants: A Secondary Analysis of the NIPPN Study

Yohei Minamitani 
1   Department of Pediatrics, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan
,
Shuntaro Oka
1   Department of Pediatrics, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan
,
Naoyuki Miyahara
1   Department of Pediatrics, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan
,
Mitsuhiro Haga 
1   Department of Pediatrics, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan
,
Atsushi Uchiyama
2   Department of Pediatrics, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Masaki Wada
3   Department of Neonatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kaoru Okazaki
4   Department of Neonatology, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan
,
Masatoshi Kondo
4   Department of Neonatology, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan
,
Nobuhiko Nagano
5   Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan
,
Akira Kobayashi
6   Department of Neonatology, Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital, Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan
,
Yoshiki Soeno
6   Department of Neonatology, Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital, Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan
,
Hidehiko Maruyama
7   Division of Neonatology, Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yushi Ito
7   Division of Neonatology, Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan
,
Fumihiko Namba
1   Department of Pediatrics, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is generally considered to have fewer enteral feeding problems than nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV). However, the effects of HFNC on the feeding outcomes in preterm infants are still controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of HFNC on postnatal growth and feeding.

Study design We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Preterm infants born <34 weeks were randomly assigned to the HFNC or NCPAP/NIPPV groups after initial extubation between 2015 and 2018. Data on postnatal growth and oral feeds were analyzed.

Results Among 338 infants in the intention-to-treat analysis, the weight at 36 weeks in the HFNC group was significantly higher than that in the NCPAP/NIPPV group (1,926 vs. 1,804 g, p = 0.04). In the per-protocol analysis, HFNC showed increased daily weight gain from extubation to discharge after adjusting for confounding factors (24.2 vs. 22.4 g/day, adjusted difference 1.65 g/day, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12–3.18). In the subgroup of infants born at 22 to 27 weeks, the weight at 36 weeks was significantly higher in the HFNC group (1,809 vs. 1,730 g, adjusted difference = 113.4 g, 95% CI: 5.0–221.8). There was no significant difference in time at initial and reached full oral feeding.

Conclusion In preterm infants, especially extremely preterm infants, the use of HFNC may be associated with better weight gain.

Key Points

  • HFNC showed better weight gain compared with NCPAP/NIPPV in preterm infants.

  • HFNC was associated with higher weight at 36 weeks postmenstrual age in extremely preterm infants.

  • This study suggests that HFNC may have benefits in postnatal growth among extremely preterm infants.

Keywords

high-flow nasal cannula - noninvasive ventilation - preterm infant - weight gain - growth

Authors' Contributions

S.O., A.U., M.W., K.O., M.K., N.N., A.K., Y.S., H.M., and Y.I. are local investigators at the participating centers who made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, and interpretation of data. Y.M. performed statistical analyses, prepared the data tables, drafted the initial manuscript, and revised the manuscript. N.M., M.H., and F.N. are local investigators who made substantial contributions to the interpretation of data, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors have read the draft and approved the final manuscript as submitted.


Data Availability

All datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Ethical approval

Written informed consent was obtained from parents of all eligible infants before enrollment. Additional consent was waived by the Ethics Committee due to the nature of the study.




Publication History

Received: 21 September 2024

Accepted: 08 January 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
09 January 2025

Article published online:
31 January 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Guillot M, Guo T, Ufkes S. et al. Mechanical ventilation duration, brainstem development, and neurodevelopment in children born preterm: a prospective cohort study. J Pediatr 2020; 226: 87-95.e3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Söderström F, Ågren J, Sindelar R. Early extubation is associated with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and lower incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Early Hum Dev 2021; 163: 105467
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Fischer HS, Bührer C. Avoiding endotracheal ventilation to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (05) e1351-e1360
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ferguson KN, Roberts CT, Manley BJ, Davis PG. Interventions to improve rates of successful extubation in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171 (02) 165-174
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Uchiyama A, Okazaki K, Kondo M. et al; Non-Invasive Procedure for Premature Neonates (NIPPN) Study Group. Randomized controlled trial of high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants after extubation. Pediatrics 2020; 146 (06) e20201101
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Hodgson KA, Wilkinson D, De Paoli AG, Manley BJ. Nasal high flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 5 (05) CD006405
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hong H, Li XX, Li J, Zhang ZQ. High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory support in preterm infants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 34 (02) 259-266
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Jaile JC, Levin T, Wung JT, Abramson SJ, Ruzal-Shapiro C, Berdon WE. Benign gaseous distension of the bowel in premature infants treated with nasal continuous airway pressure: a study of contributing factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158 (01) 125-127
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Ferrara L, Bidiwala A, Sher I. et al. Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on the pharyngeal swallow in neonates. J Perinatol 2017; 37 (04) 398-403
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Chen J, Lin Y, Du L. et al. The comparison of HHHFNC and NCPAP in extremely low-birth-weight preterm infants after extubation: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Front Pediatr 2020; 8: 250
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Shetty S, Hunt K, Douthwaite A, Athanasiou M, Hickey A, Greenough A. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen and nasal continuous positive airway pressure and full oral feeding in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2016; 101 (05) F408-F411
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Glackin SJ, O'Sullivan A, George S, Semberova J, Miletin J. High flow nasal cannula versus NCPAP, duration to full oral feeds in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2017; 102 (04) F329-F332
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Leibel SL, Castro M, McBride T. et al. Comparison of Continuous positive airway pressure versus High flow nasal cannula for Oral feeding Preterm infants (CHOmP): randomized pilot study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35 (05) 951-957
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Clark RH, Wagner CL, Merritt RJ. et al. Nutrition in the neonatal intensive care unit: how do we reduce the incidence of extrauterine growth restriction?. J Perinatol 2003; 23 (04) 337-344
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Zozaya C, Díaz C, Saenz de Pipaón M. How should we define postnatal growth restriction in preterm infants?. Neonatology 2018; 114 (02) 177-180
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Franz AR, Pohlandt F, Bode H. et al. Intrauterine, early neonatal, and postdischarge growth and neurodevelopmental outcome at 5.4 years in extremely preterm infants after intensive neonatal nutritional support. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (01) e101-e109
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48 (03) 452-458
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Yoder BA, Stoddard RA, Li M, King J, Dirnberger DR, Abbasi S. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics 2013; 131 (05) e1482-e1490
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kugelman A, Riskin A, Said W, Shoris I, Mor F, Bader D. A randomized pilot study comparing heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with NIPPV for RDS. Pediatr Pulmonol 2015; 50 (06) 576-583
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Murki S, Singh J, Khant C. et al. High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for primary respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology 2018; 113 (03) 235-241
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ehrenkranz RA, Younes N, Lemons JA. et al. Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1999; 104 (2 Pt 1): 280-289
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Luo K, Huang Y, Xiong T, Tang J. High-flow nasal cannula versus continuous positive airway pressure in primary respiratory support for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr 2022; 10: 980024
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar