Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2517-2501
Short Communication

The Relationship between Various Measures of Perinatal Quality

Nansi Boghossian
1   Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN2629)
,
Lucy Greenberg
,
Jeffrey Buzas
,
Ciaran Phibbs
2   Health Economics Resource Center (152), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, United States
,
Molly Passarella
,
Jeannette Rogowski
,
George Saade
3   OB-GYN, EVMS, Norfolk, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN6040)
,
Scott A. Lorch
› Author Affiliations
Supported by: National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities R01HD084819,R01HD099197,R01MD016012

Objective: To examine the correlations between pairs of maternal, infant, and maternal-infant dyad quality measures to provide a comprehensive assessment of perinatal care. Study Design: In a retrospective cohort study using birth and fetal death certificates linked to hospital discharge data from Michigan, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina (2016-2018), we examined correlations between pairs of maternal, infant, and maternal-infant dyad quality measures. Maternal quality measures included nulliparous term singleton vertex (NTSV) cesarean birth, non-transfusion severe maternal morbidity (SMM), and a composite maternal outcome. Infant quality was assessed with a composite outcome measure, while the dyad measure combined maternal and infant outcomes. Results: Among 955,904 dyads across 266 hospitals, 25.9% had NTSV, 0.7% had non-transfusion SMM, 12.3% had the composite infant measure, and 19.3% had the dyad measure. The correlation between non-transfusion SMM and the dyad measure was 0.12 while the correlation between the composite infant measure and the dyad measure was 0.86 which was higher than the correlation between the composite maternal measure and the dyad measure (0.47). Conclusion: We observed minimal correlations among these perinatal quality measures, especially when aggregated beyond individual outcomes.



Publication History

Received: 02 August 2024

Accepted after revision: 15 January 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 January 2025

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor , NY 10001 New York, USA