RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2789-0007
Novel Bedside Ligation for Staged Closure of Congenital Portosystemic Shunts: A Single-Center Experience in 20 Children
Autor*innen
Funding Information This work was supported by the Health Commission of Guizhou Province, gzwkj2024–430 Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Department Science and Technology Program of Guizhou Province LC [2024]107.
Abstract
Objective
To report our institutional experience with a portal venous pressure (PVP)-guided surgical strategy for congenital portosystemic shunts (CPSs) and introduce a novel bedside ligation technique for staged shunt closure.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 20 children who underwent surgical CPS closure between 2013 and 2023. The surgical approach was determined by intraoperative PVP during temporary shunt occlusion. One-stage ligation was performed when PVP remained < 25 mm Hg, whereas shunts with PVP ≥ 25 mm Hg were banded for staged closure using either bedside ligation or endovascular completion.
Results
Fourteen patients (70%) underwent one-stage closure (median PVP: 22.0 mm Hg, interquartile range [IQR]: 18.0–22.5), and six (30%) required two-stage closure (median PVP: 28.0 mm Hg, IQR: 25.8–29.5). Among the latter, five achieved complete shunt occlusion through the bedside technique, avoiding reoperation or readmission. The primary composite outcome—radiologic closure, fasting blood ammonia normalization, and absence of severe complications—was achieved in all 20 patients (100%) at 1-year follow-up. Significant intrahepatic portal vein (IPV) remodeling was observed, with median left and right IPV diameters increasing from 1.4 and 1.6 to 4.8 and 5.0 mm, respectively (both p < 0.0001). The overall complication rate was 15% (3/20), all Clavien–Dindo Grades I to II.
Conclusion
In children with CPSs unsuitable for endovascular closure, a PVP-guided surgical strategy appears safe and effective. For those requiring two-stage closure due to elevated PVP, bedside ligation after Endoloop banding provides a feasible, less invasive alternative to reoperation. However, larger studies are needed to confirm its safety and efficacy.
Keywords
Abernethy malformation - portal vein anomaly - congenital portosystemic shunts - children - surgery‡ These authors share first authorship.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 19. Oktober 2025
Angenommen: 14. Januar 2026
Accepted Manuscript online:
16. Januar 2026
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
30. Januar 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Franchi-Abella S, Gonzales E, Ackermann O, Branchereau S, Pariente D, Guérin F. International Registry of Congenital Portosystemic Shunt members. Congenital portosystemic shunts: diagnosis and treatment. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43 (08) 2023-2036
- 2 Kumar P, Bhatia M, Garg A, Jain S, Kumar K. Abernethy malformation: A comprehensive review. Diagn Interv Radiol 2022; 28 (01) 21-28
- 3 McLin VA, Franchi-Abella S, Brütsch T. et al. Expert management of congenital portosystemic shunts and their complications. JHEP Rep 2023; 6 (01) 100933
- 4 Uchida H, Shinkai M, Okuyama H. et al; Japanese Society of Pediatric Splenology and Portalvenology. Impact of portal flow on the prognosis of children with congenital portosystemic shunt: a multicentric observation study in Japan. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59 (09) 1791-1797
- 5 Matsuura T, Takahashi Y, Yanagi Y. et al. Surgical strategy according to the anatomical types of congenital portosystemic shunts in children. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51 (12) 2099-2104
- 6 Knirsch W, Benz DC, Bühr P. et al. Catheter interventional treatment of congenital portosystemic venous shunts in childhood. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 87 (07) 1281-1292
- 7 Koneti NR, Bakhru S, Jayranganath M. et al. Transcatheter closure of congenital portosystemic shunts - a multicenter experience. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2022; 15 (02) 114-120
- 8 Blanc T, Guerin F, Franchi-Abella S. et al. Congenital portosystemic shunts in children: a new anatomical classification correlated with surgical strategy. Ann Surg 2014; 260 (01) 188-198
- 9 Zhang JS, Li L. Surgical ligation of a portosystemic shunt for the treatment of type II Abernethy malformation in 12 children. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2021; 9 (02) 444-451
- 10 Bruckheimer E, Dagan T, Atar E. et al. Staged transcatheter treatment of portal hypoplasia and congenital portosystemic shunts in children. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36 (06) 1580-1585
- 11 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (02) 205-213
- 12 Augustine DX, Coates-Bradshaw LD, Willis J. et al. Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension: a guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Res Pract 2018; 5 (03) G11-G24
- 13 Ohno T, Muneuchi J, Ihara K. et al. Pulmonary hypertension in patients with congenital portosystemic venous shunt: a previously unrecognized association. Pediatrics 2008; 121 (04) e892-e899
- 14 Raevens S, Boret M, Fallon MB. Hepatopulmonary syndrome. JHEP Rep 2022; 4 (09) 100527
- 15 Lautz TB, Tantemsapya N, Rowell E, Superina RA. Management and classification of type II congenital portosystemic shunts. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46 (02) 308-314
- 16 Sartor R, Mamprim MJ, Takahira RF, de Almeida MF. Hemodynamic evaluation of the right portal vein in healthy dogs of different body weights. Acta Vet Scand 2010; 52 (01) 36
- 17 Moriyasu F, Nishida O, Ban N. et al. “Congestion index” of the portal vein. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 146 (04) 735-739
- 18 Haag K, Rössle M, Ochs A. et al. Correlation of duplex sonography findings and portal pressure in 375 patients with portal hypertension. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172 (03) 631-635
- 19 Katwal S, Ansari MA, Suwal S, Rayamajhi S, Ghimire P, Ghimire A. Measurement of portal vein indices and splenic index by ultrasound and their association with gastroesophageal varices in cirrhosis of liver. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2023; 85 (12) 5926-5931
- 20 Chocarro G, Amesty MV, Encinas JL. et al. Congenital portosystemic shunts: clinic heterogeneity requires an individual management of the patient. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2016; 26 (01) 74-80
- 21 Justino H. The significance of congenital portosystemic shunts in congenital heart disease and the bizarre phenomenon of alternating portosystemic and systemic-portal shunting. Interv Cardiol Clin 2024; 13 (03) 307-318
- 22 Morgan G, Superina R. Congenital absence of the portal vein: two cases and a proposed classification system for portasystemic vascular anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29 (09) 1239-1241
- 23 Howard ER, Davenport M. Congenital extrahepatic portocaval shunts–the Abernethy malformation. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32 (03) 494-497
- 24 DiPaola F, Trout AT, Walther AE. et al. Congenital portosystemic shunts in children: associations, complications, and outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65 (04) 1239-1251
- 25 Fahmy DM, Mitchell PD, Jonas MM. Presentation, management, and outcome of congenital portosystemic shunts in children: the Boston Children's Hospital experience. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2022; 75 (01) 81-87
- 26 Sokollik C, Bandsma RH, Gana JC, van den Heuvel M, Ling SC. Congenital portosystemic shunt: characterization of a multisystem disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 56 (06) 675-681
- 27 Ponce-Dorrego MD, Hernández-Cabrero T, Garzón-Moll G. Endovascular treatment of congenital portosystemic shunt: a single-center prospective study. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr 2022; 25 (02) 147-162
