Download PDF
Hebamme 2009; 22(3): 189-193
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1239960
Neugeborenes
Perinatale Mortalität
© Hippokrates Verlag in MVS Medizinverlage Stuttgart GmbH & Co. KG

Perinatale Mortalität nach vorangegangener Sectio

Rolf Richter, Renate L. Bergmann, Joachim W. Dudenhausen
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 September 2009 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zum Thema

Angesichts der weltweit steigenden Sectioraten wird in einer Studie ­untersucht, ob mit der Sectio eine höhere perinatale Mortalität bei späteren ­Entbindungen verbunden ist und ob dieses Risiko durch eine primäre ­Resectio reduziert werden kann.

Literatur

  • 1 Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. Pressemitteilung Nr. 050 vom 7.02.2007. http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Presse/pm/2007/02/PD07__050__231.psml . 
  • 2 Hamilton B E, Martin J A, Sutton P D. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Births: preliminary data for 2003.  Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2004;  53 1-17
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Increasing cesarean section rates: exploring the role of culture in an Australian community.  Birth. 2004;  31 117-24
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Dudenhausen J W, Rumler-Detzel P. Die Schnittentbindung auf Wunsch der Schwangeren – permissive Geburtshilfe oder akzeptabel als selbstbestimmte Geburt?.  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2000;  204 125-127
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Usha Kiran T S, Jayawickrama N S. Who is responsible for the rising caesarean section rate?.  J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;  22 363-365
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Frè M, Marsal K, Bleker O, Librero J, Grandjean H, Gratia P, Guaschino S, Heyl W, Taylor D, Cuttini M. Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians’ attitudes in eight European countries.  BJOG. 2006;  113 647-56
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Savage W, Francome C. British consultants’ attitudes to caesareans.  J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;  27 354-359
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V L, Martin D P, Easterling T R. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization.  JAMA. 2000;  283 2411-6
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: a review of the evidence.  Birth. 2002;  29 28-39
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Mozurkewich E L, Hutton E K. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  183 1187-97
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Hannah M E, Hannah W J, Hewson S A, Hodnett E D, Saigal S, Willan A R. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group.  Lancet. 2000;  356 1375-83
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Jensen D M, Damm P, Moelsted-Pedersen L, Ovesen P, Westergaard J G, Moeller M, Beck-Nielsen H. Outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: a nationwide, population-­based study.  Diabetes Care. 2004;  27 2819-23
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Pauer H U, Viereck V, Krauss V, Osmers R, Krauss T. Incidence of fetal malformations in pregnancies complicated by oligo- and polyhydramnios.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003;  268 52-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Ananth C V, Smulian J C, Vintzileos A M. The effect of placenta previa on neonatal mortality: a population-based study in the United States, 1989 through 1997.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  188 1299-304
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Ananth C V, Smulian J C, Vintzileos A M. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  177 1071-8
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V L, Easterling T R, Martin D P. First-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth.  Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  97 765-9
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Smith G C. Estimating risks of perinatal death.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  192 17-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Smith G C, Pell J P, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy.  Lancet. 2003;  362 1779-84
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Smith G C, Pell J P, Cameron A D, Dobbie R. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies.  JAMA. 2002;  287 2684-90
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Landon M B, Hauth J C, Leveno K J, Spong C Y, Leindecker S, Varner M W. et al . Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  351 2581-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Delaney T, Young D C. Spontaneous versus induced labor after a previous cesarean delivery.  Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  102 39-44
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Patel R R, Peters T J, Murphy D J. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12 944 women in England.  Int J Epidemiol. 2005;  34 353-67
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Rageth C J, Juzi C, Sege R. Perinatale kindliche Todesfälle bei Kaiserschnitt in der mütterlichen Anamnese.  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2004;  208 17-24
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Salihu H M, Li Q, Rouse D J, Alexander G R. Placenta previa: neonatal death after live births in the United States.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  188 1305-9
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Menacker F, Curtin S C. Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991 – 99.  Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001;  49 1-16
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Mankuta D D, Leshno M M, Menasche M M, Brezis M M. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: trial of labor or repeat cesarean section? A decision analysis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  189 714-9
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar

Anschrift des Autors:

Dr. rer. medic. Rolf Richter MPH

Klinik für Geburtsmedizin

Charité

Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Campus Virchow Klinikum

Augustenburger Platz 1

13353 Berlin

Email: rolf.richter@charite.de