Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000024.xml
Hebamme 2009; 22(3): 189-193
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1239960
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1239960
Neugeborenes
Perinatale Mortalität
© Hippokrates Verlag in MVS Medizinverlage Stuttgart GmbH & Co. KG
Perinatale Mortalität nach vorangegangener Sectio
Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
18 September 2009 (online)

Zum Thema
Angesichts der weltweit steigenden Sectioraten wird in einer Studie untersucht, ob mit der Sectio eine höhere perinatale Mortalität bei späteren Entbindungen verbunden ist und ob dieses Risiko durch eine primäre Resectio reduziert werden kann.
Literatur
-
1 Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. Pressemitteilung Nr. 050 vom 7.02.2007. http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Presse/pm/2007/02/PD07__050__231.psml
.
- 2 Hamilton B E, Martin J A, Sutton P D. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Births: preliminary data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2004; 53 1-17
- 3 Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Increasing cesarean section rates: exploring the role of culture in an Australian community. Birth. 2004; 31 117-24
- 4 Dudenhausen J W, Rumler-Detzel P. Die Schnittentbindung auf Wunsch der Schwangeren – permissive Geburtshilfe oder akzeptabel als selbstbestimmte Geburt?. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2000; 204 125-127
- 5 Usha Kiran T S, Jayawickrama N S. Who is responsible for the rising caesarean section rate?. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 22 363-365
- 6 Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Frè M, Marsal K, Bleker O, Librero J, Grandjean H, Gratia P, Guaschino S, Heyl W, Taylor D, Cuttini M. Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians’ attitudes in eight European countries. BJOG. 2006; 113 647-56
- 7 Savage W, Francome C. British consultants’ attitudes to caesareans. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007; 27 354-359
- 8 Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V L, Martin D P, Easterling T R. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA. 2000; 283 2411-6
- 9 Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: a review of the evidence. Birth. 2002; 29 28-39
- 10 Mozurkewich E L, Hutton E K. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183 1187-97
- 11 Hannah M E, Hannah W J, Hewson S A, Hodnett E D, Saigal S, Willan A R. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000; 356 1375-83
- 12 Jensen D M, Damm P, Moelsted-Pedersen L, Ovesen P, Westergaard J G, Moeller M, Beck-Nielsen H. Outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: a nationwide, population-based study. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27 2819-23
- 13 Pauer H U, Viereck V, Krauss V, Osmers R, Krauss T. Incidence of fetal malformations in pregnancies complicated by oligo- and polyhydramnios. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003; 268 52-6
- 14 Ananth C V, Smulian J C, Vintzileos A M. The effect of placenta previa on neonatal mortality: a population-based study in the United States, 1989 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188 1299-304
- 15 Ananth C V, Smulian J C, Vintzileos A M. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177 1071-8
- 16 Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V L, Easterling T R, Martin D P. First-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97 765-9
- 17 Smith G C. Estimating risks of perinatal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192 17-22
- 18 Smith G C, Pell J P, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet. 2003; 362 1779-84
- 19 Smith G C, Pell J P, Cameron A D, Dobbie R. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA. 2002; 287 2684-90
- 20 Landon M B, Hauth J C, Leveno K J, Spong C Y, Leindecker S, Varner M W. et al . Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351 2581-9
- 21 Delaney T, Young D C. Spontaneous versus induced labor after a previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102 39-44
- 22 Patel R R, Peters T J, Murphy D J. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12 944 women in England. Int J Epidemiol. 2005; 34 353-67
- 23 Rageth C J, Juzi C, Sege R. Perinatale kindliche Todesfälle bei Kaiserschnitt in der mütterlichen Anamnese. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2004; 208 17-24
- 24 Salihu H M, Li Q, Rouse D J, Alexander G R. Placenta previa: neonatal death after live births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188 1305-9
- 25 Menacker F, Curtin S C. Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991 – 99. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001; 49 1-16
- 26 Mankuta D D, Leshno M M, Menasche M M, Brezis M M. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: trial of labor or repeat cesarean section? A decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189 714-9
Anschrift des Autors:
Dr. rer. medic. Rolf Richter MPH
Klinik für Geburtsmedizin
Charité
Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Virchow Klinikum
Augustenburger Platz 1
13353 Berlin
Email: rolf.richter@charite.de