Synthesis 2011(12): 1896-1904  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1260031
PAPER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Synthesis of Spiro Bis-Indanes via Domino Stetter-Aldol-Michael and Stetter-Aldol-Aldol Reactions: Scope and Limitations

Eduardo Sánchez-Larios, Janice M. Holmes, Crystal L. Daschner, Michel Gravel*
Department of Chemistry, University of Saskatchewan, 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5C9, Canada
Fax: +1(306)9664730; e-Mail: michel.gravel@usask.ca;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 16 March 2011
Publication Date:
06 May 2011 (online)

Abstract

The synthesis of spiro bis-indanes by means of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalysis is reported. The dimerization of various o-formylchalcone substrates or their combination with phthaldialdehyde derivatives under the catalysis of thiazolium-derived­ carbenes afforded Stetter-aldol-Michael products and Stetter­-aldol-aldol products, respectively. The use of poor Michael acceptors in conjunction with an N-alkyltriazolium-derived catalyst furnished a variety of dibenzo[8]annulene products. This work highlights the interplay of a variety of factors affecting competing pathways in NHC-catalyzed domino reactions.

    References

  • For reviews on NHC catalysis, see:
  • 1a Enders D. Balensiefer T. Acc. Chem. Res.  2004,  37:  534 
  • 1b Berkessel A. Gröger H. Asymmetric Organocatalysis   Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2005. 
  • 1c Zeitler K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2005,  44:  7506 
  • 1d Enders D. Niemeier O. Henseler A. Chem. Rev.  2007,  107:  5606 
  • 1e Marion N. Diez-Gonzalez S. Nolan IP. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2007,  46:  2988 
  • 1f Nair V. Vellalath S. Babu B. P. Chem. Soc. Rev.  2008,  37:  2691 
  • 1g Moore JL. Rovis T. Top. Curr. Chem.  2010,  291:  77 
  • For reviews on domino reactions, see:
  • 2a Tietze LF. Chem. Rev.  1996,  96:  115 
  • 2b Fogg DE. dos Santos EN. Coord. Chem. Rev.  2004,  248:  2365 
  • 2c Tietze LF. Brasche G. Gericke K. Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis   Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2006. 
  • 2d Chapman CJ. Frost CG. Synthesis  2007,  1 
  • 2e Enders D. Grondal C. Hüttl MRM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2007,  46:  1570 
  • 3a Stetter H. Schreckenberg M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.  1973,  12:  81 
  • 3b Stetter H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.  1976,  15:  639 
  • 3c Stetter H. Kuhlmann H. Org. React.  1991,  40:  407 
  • 4 Sánchez-Larios E. Gravel M. J. Org. Chem.  2009,  74:  7536 
  • For other domino or one-pot sequences involving a Stetter reaction, see:
  • 5a Nemoto T. Fukuda T. Hamada Y. Tetrahedron Lett.  2006,  47:  4365 
  • 5b Mattson AE. Bharadwaj AR. Zuhl AM. Scheidt KA. J. Org. Chem.  2006,  71:  5715 
  • 5c He J. Tang S. Liu J. Su Y. Pan X. She X. Tetrahedron  2008,  64:  8797 
  • 5d Li Y. Shi F.-Q. He Q.-L. You S.-L. Org. Lett.  2009,  11:  3182 
  • 5e Biju AT. Wurz NE. Glorius F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2010,  132:  5970 
  • 5f Filloux CM. Lathrop SP. Rovis T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.  2010,  107:  20666 
  • 6 Breslow RJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1958,  80:  3719 
  • For domino Stetter-aldol reactions, see:
  • 7a Sun F.-G. Huang X.-L. Ye S. J. Org. Chem.  2010,  75:  273 
  • 7b Sun F.-G. Ye S. Synlett  2011,  1005 
  • For an aza-benzoin-aldol reaction, see:
  • 7c Sun F.-G. Ye S. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2011,  9:  3632 
  • For an aza-benzoin-Michael reaction, see:
  • 7d Wu K.-J. Li G.-Q. Li Y. Dai L.-X. You S.-L. Chem. Commun.  2011,  47:  493 
  • 8 Sánchez-Larios E. Holmes JM. Daschner CL. Gravel M. Org. Lett.  2010,  12:  5772 
  • 9 Enders D. Han JH. Henseler A. Chem. Commun.  2008,  3989 
  • 12 For a recent example of a Stetter reaction on an α,β-disub-stituted Michael acceptor, see: DiRocco DA. Oberg KM. Dalton DM. Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2009,  131:  10872 
  • 14 Cheng Y. Peng J.-H. Li Y.-J. Shi X.-Y. Tang M.-S. Tan T.-Y. J. Org. Chem.  2011,  76:  1844 
  • 15 Williams DBG. Lawton M. J. Org. Chem.  2010,  75:  8351 
10

The reaction of 16c to produce 19c was performed with catalyst 11.

11

HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary phase showed 19a to be racemic even when the reaction was performed with weaker bases to avoid racemization.

13

The relative configuration for 21 and 21′ was determined by the coupling constants of the proton α to the carbonyl at δ = 5.91 (d, J = 8.8 Hz) for the major diastereomer and δ = 5.97 (d, J = 5.1 Hz) for the minor diastereomer.