J Knee Surg 2014; 27(01): 053-058
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1348409
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Three-Dimensional Characterization of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament's Femoral Footprint

Robert Westermann
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Christian Sybrowsky
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Austin Ramme
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Annuziati Amedola
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Brian R. Wolf
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

18 March 2013

04 May 2013

Publication Date:
13 June 2013 (online)

Abstract

There is increasing use of three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) for researching anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions and tunnel placement. However, there is limited 3D CT data on the ACL footprint. The purpose of this study is to define the native ACL femoral footprint using 3D surface reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) imaging of cadaveric knees. The femoral insertion of the ACL was meticulously dissected and marked with drill holes in seven cadaveric knees. CT scans were performed on each specimen, and 3D computer models were created. Distance from the condyle edges to the margins of the footprint were referenced to the total condylar size. This was performed both parallel and perpendicular to the femoral axis as well as the intercondylar notch. The mean condylar depth (c/C) ratios along the axis of the femur were 0.45 ± 0.06 for the anterior border, 0.44 ± 0.08 for the posterior border, 0.26 ± 0.07 for the proximal border, and 0.63 ± 0.08 for the distal border. The mean notch (n/N) ratios for the four margins were 0.37 ± 0.04 for the anterior border, 0.67 ± 0.08 for the posterior border, 0.49 ± 0.07 for the proximal margin, and 0.50 ± 0.06 for the distal border. The mean c/C ratios parallel the intercondylar notch measured 0.23 ± 0.03 for the anterior border, 0.27 ± 0.04 for the posterior border, 0.37 ± 0.04 for the proximal border, and 0.12 ± 0.02 for the distal border. The mean n/N ratios perpendicular to the intercondylar notch measured 0.11 ± 0.06 for the anterior border, 0.52 ± 0.09 the posterior border, 0.29 ± 0.06 for the proximal border, and 0.30 ± 0.06 for the distal border. This study provides reference measures of the femoral footprint of the ACL using 3D CT. It will assist future studies that use advanced imaging to evaluate accuracy of ACL reconstruction.

 
  • References

  • 1 Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (10) 1579-1602
  • 2 Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ , et al. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000; 8 (3) 141-150
  • 3 Jepsen CF, Lundberg-Jensen AK, Faunoe P. Does the position of the femoral tunnel affect the laxity or clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee? A clinical, prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (12) 1326-1333
  • 4 Pinczewski LA, Salmon LJ, Jackson WF, von Bormann RB, Haslam PG, Tashiro S. Radiological landmarks for placement of the tunnels in single-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (2) 172-179
  • 5 Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, Szczodry M, Shen W, Fu FH. A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (3) 213-219
  • 6 Piefer JW, Pflugner TR, Hwang MD, Lubowitz JH. Anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (6) 872-881
  • 7 Amis AA, Beynnon B, Blankevoort L , et al. Proceedings of the ESSKA Scientific Workshop on Reconstruction of the Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1994; 2 (3) 124-132
  • 8 Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S, Mader K, Koebke J, Schneider T. Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (3) 220-227
  • 9 Giron F, Buzzi R, Aglietti P. Femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three techniques. A cadaver study. Arthroscopy 1999; 15 (7) 750-756
  • 10 Hoser C, Tecklenburg K, Kuenzel KH, Fink C. Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13 (4) 256-262
  • 11 Warme BA, Ramme AJ, Willey MC , et al; MOON Knee Group. Reliability of early postoperative radiographic assessment of tunnel placement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (7) 942-951
  • 12 Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK , et al. The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (6) 1418-1426
  • 13 Meuffels DE, Potters JW, Koning AH, Brown Jr CH, Verhaar JA, Reijman M. Visualization of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction bone tunnels: reliability of standard radiographs, CT scans, and 3D virtual reality images. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (6) 699-703
  • 14 Purnell ML, Larson AI, Clancy W. Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical bony landmarks using high-resolution volume-rendering computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (11) 2083-2090
  • 15 Basdekis G, Christel P, Anne F. Validation of the position of the femoral tunnels in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with 3-D CT scan. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (9) 1089-1094
  • 16 Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK , et al. Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (6) 1427-1431
  • 17 Ramme AJ, Wolf BR, Warme BA , et al. Surgically oriented measurements for three-dimensional characterization of tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comput Aided Surg 2012; 17 (5) 221-231
  • 18 Howell SM, Barad SJ. Knee extension and its relationship to the slope of the intercondylar roof. Implications for positioning the tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23 (3) 288-294
  • 19 McConkey MO, Amendola A, Ramme AJ , et al; MOON Knee Group. Arthroscopic agreement among surgeons on anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (12) 2737-2746
  • 20 Lintner DM, Dewitt SE, Moseley JB. Radiographic evaluation of native anterior cruciate ligament attachments and graft placement for reconstruction. A cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (1) 72-78
  • 21 Steckel H, Musahl V, Fu FH. The femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (1) 52-55
  • 22 Takahashi M, Doi M, Abe M, Suzuki D, Nagano A. Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (5) 787-792
  • 23 Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T. Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 1997; 10 (1) 14-21 , discussion 21–22
  • 24 Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P , et al. Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (9) 984-992
  • 25 Guo L, Yang L, Wang AM, Wang XY, Dai G. Roentgenographic measurement study for locating femoral insertion site of anterior cruciate ligament: a cadaveric study with X-Caliper. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (1) 133-137
  • 26 Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJ, Tajima G , et al. Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (9) 1226-1231
  • 27 Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Toh S. Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints. J Orthop Sci 2008; 13 (2) 122-129