Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2014; 27(06): 497-500
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368141
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 35 Years

Sameh El-Sallakh
1   Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta, Egypt
2   Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Alwakra Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
,
Philip Pastides
3   Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Panos Thomas
3   Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

07 July 2012

01 January 2014

Publication Date:
07 February 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an increasingly established method even in patients older than 35 years. Our hypothesis is that functional outcome after ACL reconstruction is comparable in patients younger and older than 35 years. A total of 28 patients (5 women and 23 men) with average age of 41.5 years (36–68) were retrospectively evaluated. The average follow-up period was 33 months. All of them were treated operatively with arthroscopic single-bundle four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. The functional outcome was determined by clinical scores (Tegner activity scale and Lysholm knee score). The median values for the Lysholm knee score were preoperatively 77 and postoperatively 96 points (range, 90–100) with significant improvement (p < 0.05) and that for the Tegner activity scale were preoperatively 4.6 points (range, 3–6), which is the same pre- and postoperatively with an overall return to baseline for all patients. No significant correlation between functional outcome and patients' age was present and no reported significant complications. The good results and a high level of patient satisfaction show that ACL reconstruction is justified even in patients (older than 35 years) with symptomatic anterior knee instability. We commonly propose surgical treatment in symptomatic patients who express the need to restore their preinjury activity levels, regardless of their age.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament - reconstruction - older than 35 years
 

  • References

  • 1 Legnani C, Terzaghi C, Borgo E, Ventura A. Management of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in patients aged 40 years and older. J Orthop Traumatol 2011; 12 (4) 177-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ciccotti MG, Lombardo SJ, Nonweiler B, Pink M. Non-operative treatment of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients. Results after long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76 (9) 1315-1321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Buss DD, Min R, Skyhar M, Galinat B, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL. Nonoperative treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a selected group of patients. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23 (2) 160-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Johnson RJ, Beynnon BD, Nichols CE, Renstrom PA. The treatment of injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74 (1) 140-151
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Shelbourne KD, Wilckens JH. Intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the symptomatic arthritic knee. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21 (5) 685-688 , discussion 688–689
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft in patients with articular cartilage damage. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25 (5) 626-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Osti L, Papalia R, Del Buono A, Leonardi F, Denaro V, Maffulli N. Surgery for ACL deficiency in patients over 50. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (3) 412-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Marquass B, Hepp P, Engel T, Düsing T, Lill H, Josten C. The use of hamstrings in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 40 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007; 127 (9) 835-843
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cameron ML, Briggs KK, Steadman JR. Reproducibility and reliability of the Outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31 (1) 83-86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Strehl A, Eggli S. The value of conservative treatment in ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). J Trauma 2007; 62 (5) 1159-1162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fitzgerald GK, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2000; 8 (2) 76-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Seng K, Appleby D, Lubowitz JH. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in patients aged 40 years or older: an expected-value decision analysis. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (8) 914-920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Barber FA, Elrod BF, McGuire DA, Paulos LE. Is an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcome age dependent?. Arthroscopy 1996; 12 (6) 720-725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Brandsson S, Kartus J, Larsson J, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J. A comparison of results in middle-aged and young patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2000; 16 (2) 178-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brown CA, McAdams TR, Harris AHS, Maffulli N, Safran MR. ACL reconstruction in patients aged 40 years and older: a systematic review and introduction of a new methodology score for ACL studies. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (9) 2181-2190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar