Aktuelle Kardiologie 2014; 3(2): 105-112
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368253
Übersichtsarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Aortenklappenersatz mit nahtfreien Herzklappenprothesen – aktueller Stand und Stellenwert in der Zukunft

Use of Sutureless Valves for Aortic Valve Replacement in Clinical Practice: State of the Art
Giuseppe Santarpino
Klinikum Nürnberg, Klinik für Herzchirurgie, Herz-Gefäß-Zentrum, Nürnberg
,
Theodor Fischlein
Klinikum Nürnberg, Klinik für Herzchirurgie, Herz-Gefäß-Zentrum, Nürnberg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 April 2014 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Im Rahmen des chirurgischen Aortenklappenersatzes führt der kontinuierliche Anstieg der durchschnittlichen Lebenserwartung unserer Bevölkerung sowie die damit verbundene Zunahme von Komorbiditäten zu einer immer häufigeren Verwendung biologischer Prothesen, auch um eine dauerhafte Antikoagulation zu vermeiden. Eine neue Alternative für den AKE stellt der Einsatz von nahtfreien, sog. Sutureless-Prothesen dar. Dabei handelt es sich um eine biologische, in einem Stent fixierte Perikardprothese, welche – wie der Name schon sagt – ohne bzw. nur mit wenigen Nähten chirurgisch implantiert wird. Zurzeit sind 3 Sutureless-Modelle auf dem Markt verfügbar, die eine beträchtliche Vereinfachung und Verkürzung der Implantation ermöglichen. Dies kann besonders für jene Patienten von Vorteil sein, welche ein erhöhtes Risiko aufweisen oder sich einer komplizierten Operation unterziehen müssen.

Abstract

In recent years, the prevalence of high-risk patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement has increased. To modify the risk associated with duration of cross clamp time or cardioplegic ischemic time, sutureless aortic prostheses have been developed. As indicated by the name, sutureless aortic bioprosthetic valves are not hand-sewn but self-anchoring. This technological modification, resulting in a reduced implantation time, could improve the outcome of patients referred for aortic valve replacement. Three sutureless bioprostheses are available on the market: 3f Enable (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA), Perceval S (Sorin Group, Saluggia, Italy) and Intuity (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, USA). This article provides an overview of the characteristics and of the published literature for those implants with an attempt to better define the role of sutureless valves in the treatment for the aortic valve stenosis and their future perspectives.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Lindmann BR, Bonow RO, Otto CM. Current management of calcific aortic stenosis. Circ Res 2013; 113: 223-237
  • 2 Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Lahey SL et al. Aortic valve replacement for patients with severe aortic stenosis: risk factors and their impact on 30-month mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 1741-1749
  • 3 Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F et al. Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2451-2496
  • 4 Sinning JM, Hammerstingl C, Vasa-Nicotera M et al. Aortic regurgitation index defines severity of peri-prosthetic regurgitation and predicts outcome in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 1134-1141
  • 5 Eggebrecht H, Schmermund A, Voigtländer T et al. Risk of stroke after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a meta-analysis of 10,037 published patients. EuroIntervention 2012; 8: 129-138
  • 6 Shrestha M, Khaladj N, Bara C et al. A staged approach towards interventional aortic valve implantation with a sutureless valve: initial human implants. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 56: 398-400
  • 7 Martens S, Sadowski J, Eckstein F et al. Clinical experience with the ATS 3f Enable Sutureless Bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40: 749-755
  • 8 Eichstaedt HC, Easo J, Härle T et al. Early single-center experience in sutureless aortic valve implantation in 120 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 370-375
  • 9 Kocher AA, Laufer G, Haverich A et al. One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 110-115
  • 10 Shrestha M, Folliguet T, Meuris B et al. Sutureless Perceval S aortic valve replacement: a multicentre prospective pilot trial. J Heart Valve Dis 2009; 18: 698-702
  • 11 Flameng W, Herregods M, Hermans H et al. Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 1453-1457
  • 12 Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Executive summary. STS spring 2005 report. Im Internet: http://www.sts.org/documents/pdf/Springs2005STSExecutiveSummary.pdf Stand: Juni 2005
  • 13 Folliguet TA, Laborde F, Zannis K et al. Sutureless perceval aortic valve replacement: results of two European centers. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 1483-1488
  • 14 Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Schmidt J et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement: first-year single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94: 504-508
  • 15 Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Concistrè G et al. Perceval S aortic valve implantation in mini-invasive surgery: the simple sutureless solution. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 15: 357-360
  • 16 Gilmanov D, Miceli A, Bevilacqua S et al. Sutureless implantation of the perceval s aortic valve prosthesis through right anterior minithoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96: 2101-2108
  • 17 Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Concistrè G et al. REDO aortic valve replacement: the sutureless approach. J Heart Valve Dis 2013; 22: 615-620
  • 18 Concistrè G, Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S et al. Two alternative sutureless strategies for aortic valve replacement: a two-center experience. Innovations (Phila) 2013; 8: 253-257
  • 19 DʼOnofrio A, Messina A, Lorusso R et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement as an alternative treatment for patients belonging to the “gray zone” between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and conventional surgery: a propensity-matched, multicenter analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 1010-1016
  • 20 Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Jessl J et al. Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 561-567