Am J Perinatol 2015; 32(09): 809-814
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1395482
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Comparison of the Miller Laryngoscope and Videolaryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation by Novice Doctors during Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Trial

Nobuyasu Komasawa
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
,
Ryusuke Ueki
2   Department of Anesthesiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
,
Yoshiroh Kaminoh
3   Department of Anesthesiology, Social Insurance Kinan Hospital, Tanabe, Japan
,
Shin-ichi Nishi
4   Division of Intensive Care Unit, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

24. August 2014

15. September 2014

Publikationsdatum:
16. Januar 2015 (online)

Abstract

Objective Recent guidelines for neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation emphasize the importance of adequate ventilation. In cases of failed resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation, tracheal intubation and chest compressions are recommended. The present study compared the utility of the Miller laryngoscope (Mil) and the videolaryngoscope Pentax-AWS Airway Scope (AWS; Hoya, Tokyo, Japan) with an infant or neonatal-sized Intlock (AWS-N; Pentax) during chest compressions on a neonatal manikin.

Study Design A total of 23 novice doctors performed tracheal intubation on a neonatal manikin using the Mil and AWS-N, with or without chest compressions.

Results In the Mil trials, all participants secured the airway without chest compressions, but nine failed with compressions (p < 0.001). In AWS-N trials, all participants succeeded regardless of whether chest compressions were performed or not. Intubation time was significantly longer with chest compressions with the Mil (p < 0.001), but not with the AWS-N. Laryngoscopy difficulty, as assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS), increased significantly with chest compressions with the Mil, but not with the AWS-N, while the VAS for tube passage through the glottis increased with compressions with the Mil, but not with the AWS-N.

Conclusion The AWS-N is an effective device for endotracheal intubation during chest compressions in neonatal simulations performed by novice doctors.

 
  • References

  • 1 Barber CA, Wyckoff MH. Use and efficacy of endotracheal versus intravenous epinephrine during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the delivery room. Pediatrics 2006; 118 (3) 1028-1034
  • 2 Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J , et al; Neonatal Resuscitation Chapter Collaborators. Part 11: Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 2010; 122 (16) (Suppl. 02) S516-S538
  • 3 Obladen M. History of neonatal resuscitation - part 3: endotracheal intubation. Neonatology 2009; 95 (3) 198-202
  • 4 Asai T, Liu EH, Matsumoto S , et al. Use of the Pentax-AWS in 293 patients with difficult airways. Anesthesiology 2009; 110 (4) 898-904
  • 5 Suzuki A, Toyama Y, Katsumi N , et al. The Pentax-AWS((R)) rigid indirect video laryngoscope: clinical assessment of performance in 320 cases. Anaesthesia 2008; 63 (6) 641-647
  • 6 Komasawa N, Ueki R, Nomura H, Itani M, Kaminoh Y. Comparison of tracheal intubation by the Macintosh laryngoscope and Pentax-AWS (Airway Scope) during chest compression: a manikin study. J Anesth 2010; 24 (2) 306-308
  • 7 Koyama J, Iwashita T, Okamoto K. Comparison of three types of laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during rhythmic chest compressions: a manikin study. Resuscitation 2010; 81 (9) 1172-1174
  • 8 Gandini D, Brimacombe JR. Neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airway in normal and low birth weight infants. Anesth Analg 1999; 89 (3) 642-643
  • 9 Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y. Validation of the Pentax-AWS Airwayscope utility as an intubation device during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the ground. J Anesth 2010; 24 (4) 582-586
  • 10 Komasawa N, Atagi K, Ueki R, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y, Tashiro C. Comparison of optic laryngoscope Airtraq(®) and Miller laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2011; 82 (6) 736-739
  • 11 Davis PG, Dawson JA. New concepts in neonatal resuscitation. Curr Opin Pediatr 2012; 24 (2) 147-153
  • 12 Simbruner G, Coradello H, Fodor M, Havelec L, Lubec G, Pollak A. Effect of tracheal suction on oxygenation, circulation, and lung mechanics in newborn infants. Arch Dis Child 1981; 56 (5) 326-330
  • 13 Probyn ME, Hooper SB, Dargaville PA, McCallion N, Harding R, Morley CJ. Effects of tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure during resuscitation of very premature lambs. Acta Paediatr 2005; 94 (12) 1764-1770
  • 14 te Pas AB, Walther FJ. A randomized, controlled trial of delivery-room respiratory management in very preterm infants. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (2) 322-329
  • 15 Schmölzer GM, Agarwal M, Kamlin CO, Davis PG. Supraglottic airway devices during neonatal resuscitation: an historical perspective, systematic review and meta-analysis of available clinical trials. Resuscitation 2013; 84 (6) 722-730
  • 16 Enomoto Y, Asai T, Arai T, Kamishima K, Okuda Y. Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100 (4) 544-548
  • 17 Hirabayashi Y, Seo N. Tracheal intubation by non-anesthesia residents using the Pentax-AWS airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21 (4) 268-271
  • 18 Komasawa N, Ueki R, Yamamoto N, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y, Tashiro C. Comparison of Pentax-AWS Airwayscope, Airtraq and Miller laryngoscope for tracheal intubation by novice doctors during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation simulation: a randomized crossover trial. J Anesth 2013; 27 (5) 778-780
  • 19 Cordero L, Hart BJ, Hardin R, Mahan JD, Nankervis CA. Deliberate practice improves pediatric residents' skills and team behaviors during simulated neonatal resuscitation. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2013; 52 (8) 747-752
  • 20 Trevisanuto D, Micaglio M, Pitton M, Magarotto M, Piva D, Zanardo V. Laryngeal mask airway: is the management of neonates requiring positive pressure ventilation at birth changing?. Resuscitation 2004; 62 (2) 151-157