Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546959
Self-Assessment Questions
Publication History
Publication Date:
08 April 2015 (online)
This section provides a review. Mark each statement on the Answer Sheet according to the factual materials contained in this issue and the opinions of the authors.
Article One (pp. 77–110)
-
The primary outcome measure in this study was
-
hearing aid satisfaction
-
categorical loudness judgments
-
compliance in the study protocol
-
change in hearing thresholds
-
-
The full-treatment group received
-
scripted counseling and sound therapy
-
scripted counseling
-
sound therapy
-
home visits during the study
-
-
Partial treatment groups included
-
scripted counseling and sound therapy
-
counseling and placebo sound generators
-
binaural sound generators and no counseling
-
B and C
-
-
Participants included in this study wanted to increase their dynamic range in order to
-
function in daily living activities
-
potentially become successful hearing aid users
-
tolerate their tinnitus
-
please their families
-
-
The sound-therapy principles tested in this study were developed by
-
Jastreboff and Jastreboff (2004)
-
Formby (2007)
-
Hazell and Sheldrake (1992)
-
Silverman (1947)
-
-
The original treatment was developed for
-
treatment of hyperacusis only
-
treatment of misophonia only
-
treatment of phonophobia only
-
treatment of hyperacusis among tinnitus patients
-
-
Reduced dynamic range can be due to
-
elevated thresholds
-
reduced sound tolerance for loud sounds
-
elevated sound tolerance for loud sounds
-
A and B
-
-
The study was placebo-controlled for
-
sound therapy
-
counseling
-
sound therapy and counseling
-
it was not placebo controlled
-
-
The neutral control group received
-
no counseling
-
a placebo sound generator
-
A and B
-
nothing
-
-
The full-treatment group had larger increases in their “uncomfortably loud” judgments at the end of the study than
-
both partial treatment groups and the control group
-
both partial treatment groups
-
the control group
-
only one of the partial treatment groups
-
-
The majority of the full-treatment group participants achieved their criterion improvements for judgments of uncomfortable loudness within how long of beginning treatment?
-
1 week
-
3 months
-
1 year
-
2 years
-
-
Treatment-related criterion increases for judgments of uncomfortable loudness were defined as
-
>20 dB
-
>15 dB
-
>10 dB
-
>5 dB
-
-
Was the treatment effect from sound therapy less than, greater than, not measured for, or equal to the treatment effect for counseling?
-
Less than
-
Greater than
-
Not measured for
-
Equal to
-
-
What did the authors conclude about the basic principles underlying Hazell and Sheldrake's full-treatment protocol for expanding the DR among individuals with sensorineural hearing loss who may report aided loudness problems?
-
The principles are valid but do not have general applicability.
-
The principles are not valid but do have general applicability.
-
The principles are not valid and do not have general applicability.
-
The principles are valid and have general applicability.
-
-
Hazell and Sheldrake's treatment protocol, which included low-level sound therapy and counseling, was eventually incorporated together with which of the following?
-
Jastreboff's neurophysiological model of tinnitus
-
Silverman's high-level sound therapy treatment
-
Cochlear implant technology
-
None of the above
-
-
Subjects reported
-
having tried but rejected amplification
-
assuming they could not tolerate amplification and therefore not trying it
-
A and B
-
none of the above
-
-
Fitting hearing aids on individuals with loudness tolerance problems often requires
-
large amounts of compression
-
inordinate decreases in maximum output levels
-
not reaching target gain and therefore compromising audibility
-
all of the above
-
-
Early efforts to improve sound tolerance and promote dynamic range expansion in individuals with hearing loss can be found in which of the following decades?
-
1940s
-
1950s
-
1960s
-
1970s
-
-
The authors define hyperacusis as a general intolerance to the loudness of sounds that would
-
be bothersome for 50% of the populations
-
not typically be bothersome for most individuals
-
be bothersome for women more than men
-
be bothersome for older adults
-
-
Audiologically, hyperacusis manifests itself as an abnormal reduction in loudness discomfort levels below approximately
-
80-dB hearing level (HL) across frequencies
-
90-dB HL across frequencies
-
100-dB HL across frequencies
-
80-dB HL in the low frequencies and 100-dB HL in the higher frequencies
-
-
Ten normal-hearing adults were included in the study in order to
-
assess learning effects associated with repeated collection of the outcome measures
-
have enough subjects in each group
-
offer undergraduates a research experience
-
none of the above
-
-
Subjects did not have a primary complaint of
-
tinnitus
-
phonophobia
-
misophonia
-
all of the above
-
-
Subjects reporting the following were ineligible for the study
-
unilateral hearing loss
-
current use of hearing aids
-
history of otologic surgery
-
all of the above
-
-
The counseling included
-
four components provided in one session
-
one component repeated each visit
-
four components taught across four sessions
-
one component provided in the first session
-
-
The placebo control sound generator was implemented by
-
the device attenuating over 60 to 70 minutes of use
-
the clinician reinforcing that over time you may not notice the low-level noise
-
reset time constant of 2 to 3 seconds when the device is removed from the ear
-
all of the above
-
-
Jastreboff's neurophysiological model suggests that hyperacusis primarily (perhaps exclusively) affects the
-
limbic system
-
autonomic system
-
auditory pathway
-
facial nerve
-
-
The authors report that the impact of full treatment
-
can be determined by adding the impact of the individual treatments of counseling and sound therapy
-
is greater than the combination of separate sound therapy and counseling treatments
-
is less than the combination of separate sound therapy and counseling treatments
-
is impossible to quantify
-
-
Sound therapy is believed to impact
-
central auditory gain
-
the limbic system
-
the individual desire to hear sound
-
none of the above
-
-
Baguley and Andersson (2007) propose that hyperacusis includes not only issues with the auditory pathway but also
-
family issues
-
childhood issues
-
nonauditory processes
-
all of the above
-
-
Hazell et al (1999) found that all of their patients with hyperacusis had some degree of
-
tinnitus
-
phonophobia
-
misophonia
-
all of the above
-