Download PDF
Journal of Pediatric Neuroradiology 2016; 05(03): 112-136
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593423
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart • New York

Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Head and Neck Anomalies

Mai-Lan Ho
1   Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Christine M. Glastonbury
2   Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Orit A. Glenn
2   Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 October 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Fetal head and neck (HN) anomalies represent complex diagnostic and management challenges, often requiring serial imaging and a multidisciplinary team approach. In this article, we will review the prenatal magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of HN malformations, with ultrasound and postnatal imaging correlation. Key topics to be discussed include craniofacial abnormalities, posterior fossa malformations, neural tube defects, cervicofacial masses, and airway anomalies.

Keywords

fetal - prenatal - head and neck - magnetic resonance imaging
 

  • References

  • 1 Nelson TR, Fowlkes JB, Abramowicz JS, Church CC. Ultrasound biosafety considerations for the practicing sonographer and sonologist. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28 (2) 139-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wataganara T, Ebrashy A, Aliyu LD , et al. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. J Perinat Med 2016; 44 (5) 533-542
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Reddy UM, Filly RA, Copel JA ; Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Department of Health and Human Services, NIH. Prenatal imaging: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (1) 145-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Tirada N, Dreizin D, Khati NJ, Akin EA, Zeman RK. Imaging pregnant and lactating patients. Radiographics 2015; 35 (6) 1751-1765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wang PI, Chong ST, Kielar AZ , et al. Imaging of pregnant and lactating patients: part 1, evidence-based review and recommendations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198 (4) 778-784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wang PI, Chong ST, Kielar AZ , et al. Imaging of pregnant and lactating patients: part 2, evidence-based review and recommendations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198 (4) 785-792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR). ACR–SPR practice parameter for the safe and optimal performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Res. 11–2015. Available at: http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/MRI_Fetal.pdf . Accessed July 1, 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Patenaude Y, Pugash D, Lim K , et al; Diagnostic Imaging Committee; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the obstetric patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014; 36 (4) 349-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bouyssi-Kobar M, du Plessis AJ, Robertson RL, Limperopoulos C. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: exposure times and functional outcomes at preschool age. Pediatr Radiol 2015; 45 (12) 1823-1830
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bulas D, Egloff A. Benefits and risks of MRI in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 2013; 37 (5) 301-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Levine D. Timing of MRI in pregnancy, repeat exams, access, and physician qualifications. Semin Perinatol 2013; 37 (5) 340-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tocchio S, Kline-Fath B, Kanal E, Schmithorst VJ, Panigrahy A. MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain. Semin Perinatol 2015; 39 (2) 73-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL. A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005; 87 (2–3) 335-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bahado-Singh RO, Goncalves LF. Techniques, terminology, and indications for MRI in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 2013; 37 (5) 334-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ciet P, Litmanovich DE. MR safety issues particular to women. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2015; 23 (1) 59-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Strizek B, Jani JC, Mucyo E , et al. Safety of MR imaging at 1.5 T in fetuses: a retrospective case-control study of birth weights and the effects of acoustic noise. Radiology 2015; 275 (2) 530-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Victoria T, Jaramillo D, Roberts TP , et al. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: jumping from 1.5 to 3 tesla (preliminary experience). Pediatr Radiol 2014; 44 (4) 376-386 , quiz 373–375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Crook N, Robinson L. A review of the safety implications of magnetic resonance imaging at field strengths of 3 Tesla and above. Radiography 2009; 15 (4) 351-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Webb JA, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK ; Members of Contrast Media Safety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). The use of iodinated and gadolinium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol 2005; 15 (6) 1234-1240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Garcia-Bournissen F, Shrim A, Koren G. Safety of gadolinium during pregnancy. Can Fam Physician 2006; 52: 309-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros Jr RK. Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (2 Pt 1): 333-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Sundgren PC, Leander P. Is administration of gadolinium-based contrast media to pregnant women and small children justified?. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34 (4) 750-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Robson CD, Barnewolt CE. MR imaging of fetal head and neck anomalies. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2004; 14 (2) 273-291 , viii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mirsky DM, Shekdar KV, Bilaniuk LT. Fetal MRI: head and neck. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2012; 20 (3) 605-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Nyberg DA, Sickler GK, Hegge FN, Kramer DJ, Kropp RJ. Fetal cleft lip with and without cleft palate: US classification and correlation with outcome. Radiology 1995; 195 (3) 677-684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mailáth-Pokorny M, Worda C, Krampl-Bettelheim E, Watzinger F, Brugger PC, Prayer D. What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of facial clefts?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36 (4) 445-451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Dabadie A, Quarello E, Degardin N , et al. Added value of MRI for the prenatal diagnosis of isolated orofacial clefts and comparison with ultrasound. Diagn Interv Imaging 2016; 97 (9) 915-921
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mazzola RF, Mazzola IC. Facial clefts and facial dysplasia: revisiting the classification. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (1) 26-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 David DJ, Moore MH, Cooter RD. Tessier clefts revisited with a third dimension. Cleft Palate J 1989; 26 (3) 163-184 , discussion 184–185
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 van der Meulen JC, Vaandrager JM. Facial clefts. World J Surg 1989; 13 (4) 373-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Vermeij-Keers C, Mazzola RF, Van der Meulen JC, Strickler M. Cerebro-craniofacial and craniofacial malformations: an embryological analysis. Cleft Palate J 1983; 20 (2) 128-145
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Versnel SL, van den Elzen ME, Wolvius EB , et al. Long-term results after 40 years experience with treatment of rare facial clefts: Part 1—Oblique and paramedian clefts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (10) 1334-1343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 van den Elzen ME, Versnel SL, Wolvius EB , et al. Long-term results after 40 years experience with treatment of rare facial clefts: Part 2—Symmetrical median clefts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (10) 1344-1352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 MacArthur CJ. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal cervicofacial anomalies. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 20 (6) 482-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Rotten D, Levaillant JM, Martinez H, Ducou le Pointe H, Vicaut E. The fetal mandible: a 2D and 3D sonographic approach to the diagnosis of retrognathia and micrognathia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19 (2) 122-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Luedders DW, Bohlmann MK, Germer U, Axt-Fliedner R, Gembruch U, Weichert J. Fetal micrognathia: objective assessment and associated anomalies on prenatal sonogram. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31 (2) 146-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Khanna PC, Thapa MM, Iyer RS, Prasad SS. Pictorial essay: The many faces of craniosynostosis. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2011; 21 (1) 49-56
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Benson ML, Oliverio PJ, Yue NC, Zinreich SJ. Primary craniosynostosis: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166 (3) 697-703
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Rustico MA, Lalatta F, Righini A, Spaccini L, Fabietti I, Nicolini U. The role of integrated imaging techniques for prenatal prediction of phenotype in two cases of facial anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24 (7) 508-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Prosser JD, Myer III CM. Branchial cleft anomalies and thymic cysts. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2015; 48 (1) 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Johnson JM, Moonis G, Green GE, Carmody R, Burbank HN. Syndromes of the first and second branchial arches, part 1: embryology and characteristic defects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32 (1) 14-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Johnson JM, Moonis G, Green GE, Carmody R, Burbank HN. Syndromes of the first and second branchial arches, part 2: syndromes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32 (2) 230-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Thomas B, Shroff M, Forte V, Blaser S, James A. Revisiting imaging features and the embryologic basis of third and fourth branchial anomalies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31 (4) 755-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Woitek R, Dvorak A, Weber M , et al. MR-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine. PLoS ONE 2014; 9 (11) e112585 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112585.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Righini A, Parazzini C, Doneda C , et al. Fetal MRI features related to the Chiari malformations. Neurol Sci 2011; 32 (Suppl. 03) S279-S281
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Abele TA, Lee SL, Twickler DM. MR imaging quantitative analysis of fetal Chiari II malformations and associated open neural tube defects: balanced SSFP versus half-Fourier RARE and interobserver reliability. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 38 (4) 786-793
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY , et al; MOMS Investigators. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 (11) 993-1004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Nagaraj UD, Peiro JL, Bierbrauer KS, Kline-Fath BM. Evaluation of subependymal gray matter heterotopias on fetal MRI. Am J Neuroradiol. 2016; 37 (4) 720-725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Robinson AJ, Ederies MA. Diagnostic imaging of posterior fossa anomalies in the fetus. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; (e-pub ahead of print). DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.04.007.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Patek KJ, Kline-Fath BM, Hopkin RJ, Pilipenko VV, Crombleholme TM, Spaeth CG. Posterior fossa anomalies diagnosed with fetal MRI: associated anomalies and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32 (1) 75-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Garel C , et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of isolated posterior fossa malformations on prenatal ultrasound imaging (part 1): nomenclature, diagnostic accuracy and associated anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47 (6) 690-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Chapman T, Mahalingam S, Ishak GE, Nixon JN, Siebert J, Dighe MK. Diagnostic imaging of posterior fossa anomalies in the fetus and neonate: part 2, Posterior fossa disorders. Clin Imaging 2015; 39 (2) 167-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Bernardo S, Vinci V, Saldari M , et al. Dandy-Walker Malformation: is the ‘tail sign’ the key sign?. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35 (13) 1358-1364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Poretti A, Boltshauser E, Huisman TA. Pre- and postnatal neuroimaging of congenital cerebellar abnormalities. Cerebellum 2016; 15 (1) 5-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Correa GG, Amaral LF, Vedolin LM. Neuroimaging of Dandy-Walker malformation: new concepts. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 22 (6) 303-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Guibaud L, Larroque A, Ville D , et al. Prenatal diagnosis of ‘isolated’ Dandy-Walker malformation: imaging findings and prenatal counselling. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32 (2) 185-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Egloff A, Bulas D. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of fetal neural tube defects. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2015; 36 (6) 487-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Turkyilmaz Z, Karabulut R, Bayazit YA , et al. Congenital neck masses in children and their embryologic and clinical features. B-ENT 2008; 4 (1) 7-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Kennedy A, Koeller KK. From the archives of the AFIP: a comprehensive review of fetal tumors with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2005; 25 (1) 215-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Vazquez E, Castellote A, Mayolas N, Carreras E, Peiro JL, Enríquez G. Congenital tumours involving the head, neck and central nervous system. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (11) 1158-1172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Kathary N, Bulas DI, Newman KD, Schonberg RL. MRI imaging of fetal neck masses with airway compromise: utility in delivery planning. Pediatr Radiol 2001; 31 (10) 727-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Mota R, Ramalho C, Monteiro J , et al. Evolving indications for the EXIT procedure: the usefulness of combining ultrasound and fetal MRI. Fetal Diagn Ther 2007; 22 (2) 107-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Quinn TM, Hubbard AM, Adzick NS. Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging enhances fetal diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33 (4) 553-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Ozolek JA. Selective pathologies of the head and neck in children: a developmental perspective. Adv Anat Pathol 2009; 16 (5) 332-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Poutamo J, Vanninen R, Partanen K, , Ryynänen, Kirkinen P. Magnetic resonance imaging supplements ultrasonographic imaging of the posterior fossa, pharynx and neck in malformed fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13 (5) 327-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Sohn YS, Kim MJ, Kwon JY, Kim YH, Park YW. The usefulness of fetal MRI for prenatal diagnosis. Yonsei Med J 2007; 48 (4) 671-677
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 We JS, Young L, Park IY, Shin JC, Im SA. Usefulness of additional fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of congenital abnormalities. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286 (6) 1443-1452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Rahbar R, Vogel A, Myers LB , et al. Fetal surgery in otolaryngology: a new era in the diagnosis and management of fetal airway obstruction because of advances in prenatal imaging. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 131 (5) 393-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Stefini S, Bazzana T, Smussi C , et al. EXIT (Ex utero Intrapartum Treatment) in lymphatic malformations of the head and neck: discussion of three cases and proposal of an EXIT-TTP (Team Time Procedure) list. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 76 (1) 20-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Dighe MK, Peterson SE, Dubinsky TJ, Perkins J, Cheng E. EXIT procedure: technique and indications with prenatal imaging parameters for assessment of airway patency. Radiographics 2011; 31 (2) 511-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Ogamo M, Sugiyama T, Maeda Y , et al. The ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure in giant fetal neck masses. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005; 20 (3) 214-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Stevens GH, Schoot BC, Smets MJ , et al. The ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure in fetal neck masses: a case report and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 100 (2) 246-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Olutoye OO, Olutoye OA. EXIT procedure for fetal neck masses. Curr Opin Pediatr 2012; 24 (3) 386-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Marler JJ, Fishman SJ, Upton J , et al. Prenatal diagnosis of vascular anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (3) 318-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Lowe LH, Marchant TC, Rivard DC, Scherbel AJ. Vascular malformations: classification and terminology the radiologist needs to know. Semin Roentgenol 2012; 47 (2) 106-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Calvo-Garcia MA, Kline-Fath BM, Adams DM , et al. Imaging evaluation of fetal vascular anomalies. Pediatr Radiol 2015; 45 (8) 1218-1229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Wagner MW, Vaught AJ, Poretti A, Blakemore KJ, Huisman TA. Vein of galen aneurysmal malformation: prognostic markers depicted on fetal MRI. Neuroradiol J 2015; 28 (1) 72-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Ryan G, Somme S, Crombleholme TM. Airway compromise in the fetus and neonate: Prenatal assessment and perinatal management. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 21 (4) 230-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Yaneza MM, Cameron A, Clement WA , et al. An interventional airway delivery service for congenital high airway obstruction. J Laryngol Otol 2015; 129 (8) 795-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Guimaraes CV, Linam LE, Kline-Fath BM , et al. Prenatal MRI findings of fetuses with congenital high airway obstruction sequence. Korean J Radiol 2009; 10 (2) 129-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Mong A, Johnson AM, Kramer SS , et al. Congenital high airway obstruction syndrome: MR/US findings, effect on management, and outcome. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38 (11) 1171-1179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Kuwashima S, Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Watanabe H, Watabe Y, Suzumura H. MR imaging appearance of laryngeal atresia (congenital high airway obstruction syndrome): unique course in a fetus. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38 (3) 344-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Saadai P, Jelin EB, Nijagal A , et al. Long-term outcomes after fetal therapy for congenital high airway obstructive syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47 (6) 1095-1100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Courtier J, Poder L, Wang ZJ, Westphalen AC, Yeh BM, Coakley FV. Fetal tracheolaryngeal airway obstruction: prenatal evaluation by sonography and MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40 (11) 1800-1805
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Coleman AM, Merrow AC, Elluru RG, Polzin WJ, Lim FY. Tracheal agenesis with tracheoesophageal fistulae: fetal MRI diagnosis with confirmation by ultrasound during an ex utero intrapartum therapy (EXIT) delivery and postdelivery MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2013; 43 (10) 1385-1390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Recio Rodríguez M, Martínez de Vega V, Cano Alonso R, Carrascoso Arranz J, Martínez Ten P, Pérez Pedregosa J. MR imaging of thoracic abnormalities in the fetus. Radiographics 2012; 32 (7) E305-E321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Gajewska-Knapik K, Impey L. Congenital lung lesions: Prenatal diagnosis and intervention. Semin Pediatr Surg 2015; 24 (4) 156-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Bertholdt C, Perdriolle-Galet E, Bach-Segura P, Morel O. Tracheal agenesis: a challenging prenatal diagnosis-contribution of fetal MRI. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2015; 2015: 456028 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/456028.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Shimabukuro F, Sakumoto K, Masamoto H , et al. A case of congenital high airway obstruction syndrome managed by ex utero intrapartum treatment: case report and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24 (3) 197-201
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar