Hamostaseologie 2006; 26(01): 55-58
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1616878
Original article
Schattauer GmbH

Langzeit-Antiaggregation mit Clopidogrel statt ASS, Clopidogrel und ASS

Was ist wann indiziert bei akutem Koronarsyndrom?Inhibition of platelet aggregation for the secondary prevention after ACSWhen clopidogrel instead of ASA, when clopidogrel and ASA?
T. Klaus
1   Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
,
I. Ahrens
1   Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
,
C. Bode
1   Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 December 2017 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Eine dauerhafte Thrombozytenaggregationshemmung ist ein essenzieller Bestandteil der Sekundärprophylaxe nach akutem Koronarsyndrom (ACS). Seit Ende der 1980er Jahre des vergangenen Jahrhunderts ist die Thrombozytenaggregationshemmung mit Azetylsalizylsäure (ASS) als eine effektive und sichere Therapie für diese Indikation etabliert. Etwa ein Jahrzehnt später wurde mit der Einführung der Thienopyridine eine kombinierte synergistische Thrombozytenaggregationshemmung möglich, die insbesondere in der interventionellen Kardiologie neue Möglichkeiten eröffnete. Das zuerst verfügbare Ticlopidin ist mittlerweile, aufgrund der besseren pharmakologischen Eigenschaften und des günstigeren Profils an unerwünschten Arzneimittelwirkungen durch Clopidogrel weitgehend ersetzt. Nach wie vor hat die Standardtherapie mit ASS in niedriger Dosierung (mindestens 75 mg/d) als Langzeittherapie in der Sekundärprophylaxe einen hohen Stellenwert. Clopidogrel bietet nach den aktuellen Studien jedoch eine ebenso sichere und effektive Alternative. Nach PTCA mit Implantation eines herkömmlichen Metallstents sollte zur Verhinderung einer akuten Stentthrombose für mindestens vier Wochen eine Kombinationstherapie mit ASS und Clopidogrel durchgeführt werden. Bei ACS ohne ST-Strecken-Hebungsinfarkt ist die Kombination von ASS und Clopidogrel besser als die alleinige Gabe von ASS. Aktuelle Daten scheinen dies auch für das ACS mit ST-Strecken-Hebungsinfarkt zu belegen. Ob generell die dauerhafte Kombinationstherapie von ASS mit Clopidogrel zur Sekundärprophylaxe sicher und evtl. effektiver ist, wird diskutiert.

Summary

Long-term inhibition of platelet aggregation is essential for the secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Inhibition of platelet aggregation with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) has been established as a safe and effective therapy in this indication already end of the eighties in the preceeding century. A decade later, with the introduction of the thienopyridines, combined platelet aggregation inhibition became possible. This opened the door for new treatment strategies in interventional cardiology. The first substance, ticlopidine was more or less replaced by the newer substance clopidogrel, which has improved pharmacological properties and less side effects. Low dose ASA (75 mg/d) is still regarded as the standard therapy for secondary prevention after ACS. However, large clinical trials established clopidogrel as at least as effective and safe as ASA in this indication. Following PCI with bare metal stent implantation, a combined therapy of ASA and clopidogrel should be given for at least 4 weeks. After ACS with non- ST-elevation myocardial infarction the combined therapy with ASA and clopidogrel gives a better outcome than ASA alone. Recently published clinical trials show superiority of this strategy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, too. If a combined long-term platelet aggregation inhibition with ASA and clopidogrel will be safe and more effective for secondary prevention is discussed.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ahrens I, Bode C, Peter KH. Inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation. Handb Exp Pharm 2005; 170: 443-62.
  • 2 Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration.. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy. I. Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. Br Med J 1994; 308: 81-106.
  • 3 Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration.. Prevention of death, myocardial infarction and stroke by antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients. Br Med J 2002; 324: 71-86.
  • 4 Beckerath N, Taubert D, Pogatsa-Murray G. et al. Absorption, metabolization, and antiplatelet effects of 300-, 600-, and 900-mg loading doses of clopidogrel: results of the ISAR-CHOICE (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Choose Between 3 High Oral Doses for Immediate Clopidogrel Effect) Trial. Circulation 2005; 112: 2946-50.
  • 5 Bertrand ME, Rupprecht H-J, Urban P. et al. Double- blind study of the safety of clopidogrel with and without a loading dose in combination with aspirin compared with ticlopidine in combination with aspirin after coronary stenting. The clopidogrel aspirin stent international cooperative study (CLASSICS). Circulation 2000; 102: 624-9.
  • 6 CAPRIE Steering Committee.. A randomised, blinded trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 1996; 348: 1329-39.
  • 7 Chan FK, Ching JY, Hung LC. et al. Clopidogrel versus aspirin and esopremazole to prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding. N Engl J Med 2005; 325: 238-44.
  • 8 00. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. Br Med J 2002; 324: 71-86.
  • 9 CURE Steering Committee.. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 494-502.
  • 10 Fox KA. Is clopidogrel plus aspirin more cost-effective than aspirin alone in high risk patients with acute coronary syndromes?. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005; 2: 444-5.
  • 11 Hennekens CH, Dyken ML, Fuster V. Aspirin as a therapeutic agent in cardiovascular disease. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 1997; 96: 2751.
  • 12 Hollopeter G, Jantzen HM, Vincent D. et al. Identification of the platetlet ADP receptor targeted by antithrombotic drugs. Nature 2001; 409: 202-7.
  • 13 ISIS-2 Collaborative Group.. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet 1988; 2: 349-60.
  • 14 Karnon J, Bakhai A, Brennan A. et al. A cost-utility analysis of clopidogrel in patients with non-STsegment- elevation acute corornary syndromes in the UK. Int J Cardiol. 2005 Epub ahead of print.
  • 15 Kroll MH, Sullivan R. Mechanisms of platelet activation. In: Loscalzo J, Schafer AI. (eds). Thrombosis and Hemorrhage. Baltimore: William & Wilkins; 1998: 261-91.
  • 16 Lindgren P, Stenestrand U, Malmberg K. et al. The long-term cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Sweden. Clin Ther 2005; 27: 100-10.
  • 17 Patrono C. Pharmacology of antiplatelet agents. In: Loscalzo J, Schafer AI. (eds). Thrombosis and Hemorrhage. Baltimore: William & Wilkins; 1998: 1181-92.
  • 18 Patrono C. Aspirin as an antiplatelet drug. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1287-94.
  • 19 Patrono C, Coller B, Dalen JE. et al. Platelet-active drugs: The relationship among dose, effectiveness, and side effects. Chest 2001; 119: 39S-63S.
  • 20 Peters RJ, Mehta SR, Fox KA. et al. Effects of aspirin dose when used alone or in combination with clopidogrel in patients acute coronary syndromes: observations from the clopidogrel in unstable angina to prevent recurrent events (CURE) study. Circulation 2003; 108: 1682-7.
  • 21 Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM. et al. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1179-89.
  • 22 Savi P, Pereillo JM, Uzabiaga MF. et al. Identification and biological activity of the active metabolite of clopidogrel. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84: 891-6.
  • 23 Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann 3rd JT. et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutanous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 2411-20.
  • 24 The RISC Group.. Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease. Lancet 1990; 336: 827.
  • 25 The task force on the use of antiplatelet agents in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease of the European Society of Cardiology.. Expert consensus document on the use of antiplatelet agents. Europ Heart J 2004; 25: 166-81.
  • 26 Weintraub WS, Mahoney EM, Lamy A. et al. Long-term cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel given for up to one year in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 838-45.
  • 27 Wodlinger AM, Pieper JA. The role of clopidogrel in the management of acute coronary syndromes. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 2155-81.
  • 28 Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mheta SR. et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 494-502.