Download PDF
Nervenheilkunde 2012; 31(12): 923-932
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1628253
Übersichtsartikel
Schattauer GmbH

Indizierte Prävention psychotischer Störungen

Behandlung von Personen mit erhöhtem PsychoserisikoPrevention of psychosis
D. Hirjak
1   Zentrum für Psychosoziale Medizin, Klinik für Allgemeine Psychiatrie, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg
,
A. Bechdolf
2   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinik Köln
,
P. A. Thomann
1   Zentrum für Psychosoziale Medizin, Klinik für Allgemeine Psychiatrie, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg
,
U. Thiemann
3   Zentrum für Psychosoziale Medizin, Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg
,
R. C. Wolf
1   Zentrum für Psychosoziale Medizin, Klinik für Allgemeine Psychiatrie, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingegangen am: 01 December 2011

angenommen am: 13 December 2011

Publication Date:
23 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Eine Frühintervention in der Prodromalphase einer psychotischen Störung zielt auf die Prävention der manifesten Erkrankung ab. Unklar ist die tatsächliche Effektivität spezifischer klinischer Interventionen. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit wurde eine systematische Literatursuche via PubMed und MEDLINE zwischen Januar 2000 und Juni 2011 anhand der Kombination der Schlüsselwörter „psychosis“, „high risk OR prodrome“ und „intervention“ durchgeführt und die Literatursuche durch eine gezielte weiterführende Literaturrecherche ergänzt. Zur Frühintervention bei Personen mit erhöhtem Psychoserisiko konnten in der Literatur elf klinische Studien, einige Übersichtsarbeiten und eine formale Metaanalyse identifiziert werden. Hinsichtlich einer medikamentösen Intervention liegt eine vorläufige Evidenz für Risperidon, Olanzapin und Amisulprid vor. Im Hinblick auf die untersuchten psychotherapeutischen Verfahren sprechen die Ergebnisse am ehesten für eine integrierte psychotherapeutische Intervention und für eine kognitive Verhaltenstherapie. Nach kritischer Betrachtung der Datenlage gibt es Hinweise darauf, dass eine Frühintervention bei Personen mit erhöhtem Psychoserisiko wirksam sein könnte.

Summary

Several studies on patients with “at risk mental state” reported transition to psychosis rates of 20 to 40%. Therefore, early and effective therapeutic interventions during in the prodromal phase are highly desirable. However, at present there is considerable uncertainty with regard to effective and evidence-based early intervention modalities. We conducted a systematic literature search via PubMed and MEDLINE using a combination of the keywords „psychosis“, „prodrome OR high risk“ and „intervention“ between January 2000 and June 2011. With regard to early intervention in the prodromal state of psychosis, we identified eleven clinical studies, several review articles and one meta-analysis. Considering pharmacological treatment in the prodromal phase, there is some preliminary evidence for medication with risperidone, olanzapine and amisulpride. With respect to psychotherapeutic interventions, the present clinical trials argue for an integrative psychotherapeutic treatment and cognitive behavioral therapy. In conclusion, there is preliminary evidence indicating that clinical interventions during the prodromal phase might be effective in preventing manifest psychosis.

Schlüsselwörter

Prodrom - Psychose - Frühbehandlung - Schizophrenie

Keywords

Prodrome - psychosis - early intervention - schizophrenia
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Resch F. Früherkennung und Frühbehandlung der Schizophrenie: Chance oder Dilemma?. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsyschiatrie und Psychotherapie 2008; 36 (04) 235-44.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Falkai P. Diagnose, Ätiologie und Neuropsychopathologie der Schizophrenie. In: Kircher T, Gauggel S. (Eds.). Neuropsychologie der Schizophrenie Symptome, Kognition, Gehirn. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Klosterkotter J. Indicated prevention of schizophrenia. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008; 105 (30) 532-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Petersen L. et al. Improving 1-year outcome in first-episode psychosis: OPUS trial. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 48 Suppl: s98-103.
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Crespo-Facorro B. et al. Effectiveness of haloperidol, risperidone and olanzapine in the treatment of first-episode non-affective psychosis: results of a randomized, flexible-dose, open-label 1-year follow-up comparison. J Psychopharmacol. 2011 Jan. E-Pub ahead of print.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Turner MA. et al. Outcomes for 236 patients from a 2-year early intervention in psychosis service. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2009; 120 (02) 129-37.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Josiassen R. et al. Early intervention with second-generation antipsychotics in first-episode psychosis: results of an 8-week naturalistic study. Early Interv Psychiatry 2010; 4 (01) 57-63.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Volz HP, Dietmaier O. Pharmakotherapie der Schizophrenie. Nervenheilkunde 2011; 4: 229-37.
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Maurer K, Häfner H. Früherkennung der Schizophrenie und die Bedeutung für Verlauf und Outcome. Journal für Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie 2007; 8 (02) 24-34.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Mossaheb N. et al. [Early recognition and intervention for schizophrenia]. Nervenarzt 2006; 77 (01) 23-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bechdolf A. et al. Frühintervention vor schizophrenen Erkrankungen. Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 17-27.
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cornblatt BA, Lencz T, Kane JM. Treatment of the schizophrenia prodrome: is it presently ethical?. Schizophr Res 2001; 51 (01) 31-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 McGorry PD. et al. Randomized controlled trial of interventions designed to reduce the risk of progression to first-episode psychosis in a clinical sample with subthreshold symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002; 59 (10) 921-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fusar-Poli P. et al. Prefrontal function at presentation directly related to clinical outcome in people at ultrahigh risk of psychosis. Schizophr Bull 2011; 37 (01) 189-98.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fusar-Poli P. et al. Thalamic glutamate levels as a predictor of cortical response during executive functioning in subjects at high risk for psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 May 2, E-Pub ahead of print.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mechelli A. et al. Neuroanatomical abnormalities that predate the onset of psychosis: a multicenter study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68 (05) 489-95.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Dazzan P. et al. Volumetric abnormalities predating the onset of schizophrenia and affective psychoses: an MRI study in subjects at ultrahigh risk of psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2011 Apr 25; E-Pub ahead of print.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Valli I. et al. Altered medial temporal activation related to local glutamate levels in subjects with prodromal signs of psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 69 (01) 97-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 McGorry PD. Risk syndromes, clinical staging and DSM V: new diagnostic infrastructure for early intervention in psychiatry. Schizophr Res 2010; 120 1–3 49-53.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Corcoran CM, First MB, Cornblatt B. The psychosis risk syndrome and its proposed inclusion in the DSM-V: a risk-benefit analysis. Schizophr Res 2010; 120 1–3 16-22.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hafner H. et al. Early detection and secondary prevention of psychosis: facts and visions. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2004; 254 (02) 117-28.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Woods SW, Carlson JP, McGlashan TH. DSM-5 and the ‘Psychosis Risk Syndrome‘: The DSM-5 proposal is better than DSM-IV. Psychosis 2010; 2 (03) 187-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Woods SW. et al. The case for including Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms Syndrome in DSM-5 as a psychosis risk syndrome. Schizophr Res 2010; 123 2–3 199-207.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hafner H, an der Heiden W. The course of schizophrenia in the light of modern follow-up studies: the ABC and WHO studies. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1999; 249 Suppl 4: 14-26.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cornblatt BA. The New York high risk project to the Hillside recognition and prevention (RAP) program. Am J Med Genet 2002; 114 (08) 956-66.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gottesman II. Schizophrenia epigenesis: past, present, and future. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1994; 384: 26-33.
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Klosterkotter J, Schultze-Lutter F. [Is there a primary prevention of schizophrenic psychiasis?]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2001; 69 Suppl 2: S104-12.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Phillips LJ, Yung AR, McGorry PD. Identification of young people at risk of psychosis: validation of Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic in-take criteria. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2000; 34 Suppl: S164-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Yung AR. et al. Testing the Ultra High Risk (prodromal) criteria for the prediction of psychosis in a clinical sample of young people. Schizophr Res 2006; 84 (01) 57-66.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Yung AR. et al. Risk factors for psychosis in an ultra high-risk group: psychopathology and clinical features. Schizophr Res 2004; 67 2–3 131-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Yung AR. et al. Validation of prodromal“ criteria to detect individuals at ultra high risk of psychosis: 2 year follow-up. Schizophr Res 2008; 105 1–3 10-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Yung AR. et al. Psychosis prediction: 12-month follow up of a high-risk (prodromal“) group. Schizophr Res 2003; 60 (01) 21-32.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 McGorry PD, Yung AR, Phillips LJ. The close-in“ or ultra high-risk model: a safe and effective strategy for research and clinical intervention in prepsychotic mental disorder. Schizophr Bull 2003; 29 (04) 771-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Ruhrmann S. et al. Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adults at high risk: results from the prospective European prediction of psychosis study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67 (03) 241-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Cannon TD. et al. Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65 (01) 28-37.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Klosterkotter J. et al. Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58 (02) 158-64.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Klosterkoetter J, Schultze-Lutter F, Ruhrmann S. Früherkennungssysteme der schizophrenen Erkrankung. In: Falkai P, Pajonk FG. (Eds.). Psycho-tische Störungen Systematische Therapie mir modernen Neuroleptika. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Bechdolf A. et al. Interventions in the initial prodromal states of psychosis in Germany: concept and recruitment. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 2005; 48: s45-8.
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Bechdolf A. et al. Subjective quality of life in subjects at risk for a first episode of psychosis: a comparison with first episode schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. Schizophr Res 2005; 79 (01) 137-43.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Yung AR. et al. The comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental states (CAARMS). Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Australia; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Miller TJ. et al. Prospective diagnosis of the initial prodrome for schizophrenia based on the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes: preliminary evidence of interrater reliability and predictive validity. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159 (05) 863-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Wood SJ. et al. Medial temporal lobe glutathione concentration in first episode psychosis: a 1H-MRS investigation. Neurobiol Dis 2009; 33 (03) 354-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Gross G HG, Klosterkötter J, Linz M. Bonner Skala für die Bestimmung von Basissymptomen (BSABS). Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Schultze-Lutter F KJ. Schizophrenia Prediction Instrument, Adult Version (SPI-A). Universität Köln; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Häfner H. et al. Ein Instrument zur retrospektiven Einschätzung des Erkrankungsbeginn bei Schizophrenie (Instrument for the Retrospective Assessment of the Onset of Schizophrenia – IRAOS“). Entwicklung und Ergebnisse. Z Klin Psychol 1990; 19: 230-55.
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Häfner H. et al. IRAOS: Interview für die retrospektive Erfassung des Erkrankungsbeginns und -verlaufs bei Schizophrenie und anderen Psychosen. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 47 McGorry PD. et al. Intervention in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: a review and future directions. J Clin Psychiatry 2009; 70 (09) 1206-12.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 de Koning MB. et al. Early intervention in patients at ultra high risk of psychosis: benefits and risks. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2009; 119 (06) 426-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Preti A, Cella M. Randomized-controlled trials in people at ultra high risk of psychosis: a review of treatment effectiveness. Schizophr Res 2010; 123 (01) 30-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Ruhrmann S. et al. Pharmacological intervention in the initial prodromal phase of psychosis. Eur Psychiatry 2005; 20 (01) 1-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Ruhrmann S. et al. Intervention in at-risk states for developing psychosis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2010; 260 Suppl 2: S90-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Larsen TK. et al. Early detection and intervention in first-episode schizophrenia: a critical review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001; 103 (05) 323-34.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Marshall MRJ. Early intervention for psychosis. Cochrane Database System. Rev. 2011 Jun 15 (6): CD 004718.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Phillips LJ. et al. Medium term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of interventions for young people at ultra high risk of psychosis. Schizophr Res 2007; 96 1–3 25-33.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Overall JE, Gorham DR. The brief psychitric rating scale. Psychol Rep 1962; 10: 799-812.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Andreasen NC, Flaum M, Arndt S. The Comprehensive Assessment of Symptoms and History (CASH). An instrument for assessing diagnosis and psychopathology. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992; 49 (08) 615-23.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 McGlashan TH. et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus placebo in patients prodromally symptomatic for psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163 (05) 790-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 McGlashan TH. et al. The PRIME North America randomized double-blind clinical trial of olanza-pine versus placebo in patients at risk of being prodromally symptomatic for psychosis. I. Study rationale and design. Schizophr Res 2003; 61 (01) 7-18.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Guy W. National Institute of Mental Health (US). Division of Extramural Research Programs. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rev. 1976 ed. Rockville, Md.: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, National Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs 1976.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134: 382-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry 1978; 133: 429-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Bechdolf A. et al. Preventing progression to first-episode psychosis in early initial prodomal states. Br J Psychiatry 2012; 200: 22-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Bechdolf A. et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the pre-psychotic phase: an exploratory study. Psychiatry Res 2005; 136 2–3 251-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Morrison AP. et al. Cognitive therapy for the prevention of psychosis in people at ultra-high risk: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 185: 291-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Bechdolf A. et al. Randomized controlled multi-centre trial of cognitive behaviour therapy in the early initial prodromal state: effects on social adjustment post treatment. Early Interv Psychiatry 2007; 1 (01) 71-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Morrison AP. et al. Three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of cognitive therapy for the prevention of psychosis in people at ultrahigh risk. Schizophr Bull 2007; 33 (03) 682-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Nordentoft M. et al. Transition rates from schizotypal disorder to psychotic disorder for first-contact patients included in the OPUS trial. A randomized clinical trial of integrated treatment and standard treatment. Schizophr Res 2006; 83 (01) 29-40.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Bertelsen M. et al. Five-year follow-up of a randomized multicenter trial of intensive early intervention vs standard treatment for patients with a first episode of psychotic illness: the OPUS trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65 (07) 762-71.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Bechdolf A, Wagner M, Veith V. A randomized controlled multicenter trial of cognitive behaviour therapy in the early initial prodromal state of psychosis. Schizophr Res 2006; 86 suppl. S8.
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Amminger GP. et al. Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids for indicated prevention of psychotic disorders: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67 (02) 146-54.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Woods SW. et al. Randomized trial of olanzapine versus placebo in the symptomatic acute treatment of the schizophrenic prodrome. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54 (04) 453-64.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Ruhrmann S. et al. Acute effects of treatment for prodromal symptoms for people putatively in a late initial prodromal state of psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 51 Suppl: s88-95.
    Google Scholar
  • 73 Woods SW. et al. Glycine treatment of prodromal symptoms. Schizophr Res 2006; 86 Suppl S7.
    Google Scholar
  • 74 Woods SW. et al. Aripiprazole in the treatment of the psychosis prodrome: an open-label pilot study. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 51 Suppl: s96-101.
    Google Scholar
  • 75 Wood SJ, Berger GE, DellOlio M. Effects of low dose lithium on hipocampal neuropathology in people ar ultra high risk for psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 61: 259-60.
    Google Scholar
  • 76 Marshall M, Rathbone J. Early intervention for psychosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 6: CD004718.
    Google Scholar
  • 77 Bechdolf A. et al. Recent approaches to psychological interventions for people at risk of psychosis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2006; 256 (03) 159-73.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Bechdolf A. [Early detection and intervention in first episode psychosis]. MMW Fortschr Med 2009; 151 (22) 45-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Schultze-Lutter F, Ruhrmann S. Früherkennung und Frühbehandlung von Psychosen. Bremen: UNI-MED Verlag AG; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 80 Vasic N, Wolf RC. Wie früh kann eine Schizophrenie erkannt und behandelt werden?. Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 1-7.
    Google Scholar
  • 81 Morrison AP. et al. Early detection and intervention evaluation for people at high-risk of psychosis-2 (EDIE-2): trial rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Early Interv Psychiatry 2001; 5 (01) 24-32.
    Google Scholar