Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16(04): 223-231
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632784
Clinical Communication
Schattauer GmbH

The use of Ellis pins (negative profile tip-threaded pins) in external skeletal fixation in dogs and cats

A. L. Beck
1   Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hertfordshire, UK
,
M. J. Pead
1   Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hertfordshire, UK
› Author AffiliationsThe authors would like to thank Chris Lamb for photography and Professor Leslie Vaughan for his review of the manuscript.
Further Information

Publication History

Received 27 November 2002

Accepted 30 January 2003

Publication Date:
22 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

The Ellis pin is commonly used in external skeletal fixators (ESFs) but some authors suggest that this pin suffers from a high rate of failure. The purpose of this study was to look for complications associated with four different pin types, in particular pin breakage, as well as pin loosening, radiolucency around pins and pin tract discharge. Fifty consecutive cases which had an ESF applied using Ellis pins were identified. Radiographs and case records were used to record case details, ESF design, duration of fixation, pin types used, and complications. Records from 31 dogs and 17 cats were examined (2 animals were removed from the study because of incomplete follow-up). There were 21 Type I, 7 Type I with a tied-in IM pin, 2 modified Type I, 2 modified Type I with a tied-in IM pin and 16 modified Type II ESFs. 160 Ellis pins, 30 centrally threaded positive profile pins, 4 end threaded positive profile pins and 46 smooth pins were used. Complications relating to one or more of the pins were seen in 65% of the fixators. None of the pins broke. There was a significant association between individual pin type and the number of pins showing loosening (p = 0.002) or radiolucency (p = 0.006), but not a significance in the association between pin type and discharge (Chi-Square test). When each pin was compared against each other pin, smooth pins were significantly more likely to be loose than Ellis pins (p <0.001), and centrally threaded positive profile pins were significantly more likely to result in radiolucency than Ellis pins (p = 0.01), using a Chi-square test. There was not any significant association between any other pin types for any complication using a Fisher’s Exact test. The study demonstrates that Ellis pins, when inserted correctly, are not at any greater risk of failure than other pin types, and that fewer complications may be associated with them than other pin designs.

Keywords

External skeletal fixation - Ellis pin - radiolucency - pin loosening
 

  • References

  • 1 Anderson MA, Mann FA, Wagner-Mann C, Hahn AW, Jiang BL, Tomlinson JL. A comparison of nonthreaded, enhanced threaded, and ellis fixation pins used in Type I external skeletal fixators in dogs. Vet Surg 1993; 22: 482-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Aron DC, Toombs JP. Updated principles of external skeletal fixation. Comp of Contin Educ Pract Vet 1984; 06: 845-58.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bennett RA, Egger EL, Histand M, Ellis AB. Comparison of the strength and holding power of 4 pin designs for use with half pin (Type I) external skeletal fixation. Vet Surg 1987; 16: 207-11.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Briggs BT, Chao EYS. The mechanical performance of the standard Hoffman-Vidal external fixation apparatus. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64: 566-73.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Brinker WO, Flo GL. Principles and application of external skeletal fixation. Vet Clin North Am Small Animal Practice 1975; 05: 197-208.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Case J, Chilver AH. Bending moments and shearing forces. In: Strength of materials and structures. London: Edward Arnold Ltd; 1971: 110-1.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Dernell WS, Harrari J, Blackketter DM. A comparison of acute pull-out strength between twoway and one-way transfixion pin insertion for external skeletal fixation in canine bone. Vet Surg 1993; 22: 110-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Egger EL. Complications of external fixation a problem-oriented approach. Vet Clin North Am Small Animal Practice 1991; 21: 705-33.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Egger EL, Histand MB, Blass CE, Powers BE. Effect of fixation pin insertion on the bone-pin interface. Vet Surg 1986; 15: 246-52.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ellis AB, Dickason JM. Clinical trials of the ellis partially threaded pin. Proc 14th . Ann Vet Ortho Soc 1987; 2.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gumbs JM, Brinker WO, DeCamp CE, Schaeffer R, Kaneene JB, Soutas-Little RW. Comparison of acute and chronic pull-out resistance of pins used with the external fixator (Kirschner splint). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1988; 24: 231-4.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Harari J. Complications of external skeletal fixation. Vet Clin North Am Small Animal Practice 1992; 22: 99-107.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hulse D, Hyman B. Fracture fixation failure. Vet Clin North Am Small Animal Practice 1991; 21: 647-67.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Marti JM, Roe SS. An in vitro comparison of hollow ground and trocar points on threaded positive-profile external skeletal fixation pins in canine cadaveric bone. Vet Surg 1999; 18: 279-86.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Matthews LS, Hirsch C. Temperatures measured in human cortical bone when drilling. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972; 54: 297-308.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Olmstead ML, Egger EL. Primary and auxiliary implants and techniques. In: Olmstead ML. (ed). Small Animal Orthopedics. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995: 124-8.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Palmer RH, Aron DN. Ellis pin complications in seven dogs. Vet Surg 1990; 19: 440-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Palmer RH, Hulse DA, Hyman WA, Palmer DR. Principles of bone healing and biomechanics of external skeletal fixation. Vet Clin North Am Small Animal Practice 1992; 22: 45-68.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Piermattei DL. Fractures: Classification, Diagnosis and Treatment. In: Piermattei DL, Flo GL. (eds). Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1997: 68-70.
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Toombs JP. Principles of external skeletal fixation using the Kirschner-Ehmer splint. Vet Med and Surg (Sm Anim) 1991; 06: 68-74.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wikenheiser MA, Markel MD, Lewallen DG, Chao EY. Thermal response and torque resistance of five cortical half-pins under simulated insertion technique. J Orthop Res 1995; 13: 615-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar