Modeling and Designing a Proteomics Application on PROTEUS

Summary

Objectives: Biomedical applications, such as analysis and management of mass spectrometry proteomics experiments, involve heterogeneous platforms and knowledge, massive data sets, and complex algorithms. Main requirements of such applications are semantic modeling of the experiments and data analysis, as well as high performance computational platforms. In this paper we propose a software platform allowing to model and execute biomedical applications on the Grid.

Methods: Computational Grids offer the required computational power, whereas ontologies and workflow help to face the heterogeneity of biomedical applications. In this paper we propose the use of domain ontologies and workflow techniques for modeling biomedical applications, whereas Grid middleware is responsible for high performance execution. As a case study, the modeling of a proteomics experiment is discussed.

Results: The main result is the design and first use of PROTEUS, a Grid-based problem-solving environment for biomedical and bioinformatics applications.

Conclusion: To manage the complexity of biomedical experiments, ontologies help to model applications and to identify appropriate data and algorithms, workflow techniques allow to combine the elements of such applications in a systematic way. Finally, translation of workflow into execution plans allows the exploitation of the computational power of Grids. Along this direction, in this paper we present PROTEUS discussing a real case study in the proteomics domain.

Keywords

Bioinformatics - Grid-based problem-solving environments - ontology - proteomics - workflow

• References

• 1 Baldi P, Brunak S. Bioinformatics: The Machine Learning Approach. MIT Press; 2001
• 2 Taylor CF. et al. A systematic approach to modelling capturing and disseminating proteomics experimental data. Nature Biotechnology 2003; 21: 247-54.
• 3 Foster I, Kesselman C, Tuecke S. The Anatomy of the Grid: Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations. Supercomputer Applications 2001; 15: 03.
• 4 Cannataro M, Talia D. KNOWLEDGE GRID: An Architecture for Distributed Knowledge Discovery. Communication of the ACM 2003; 46 (01) 89-93.
• 5 Gruber TR. A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 1993; 5 (02) 199-220.
• 6 Wroe C, Stevens R, Goble C, Roberts A, Greenwood A. A suite of DAML+OIL Ontologies to Describe Bioinformatics Web Services and Data. Journal of Cooperative Information Systems – Special issue on. Bioinformatics 2003; 12 (02) 197-224.
• 7 Gallopoulos S, Houstis EN, Rice J. Computer as Thinker/Doer: Problem-Solving Environments for Computational Science. IEEE Computational Science and Engineering 1994; 1 (02) 11-23.
• 8 Cannataro M, Comito C, Congiusta A, Veltri P. PROTEUS: a Bioinformatics Problem Solving Environment on Grids. Parallel Processing Letters 2004; 14 (02) 217-37.
• 9 The Globus Project. www.globus.org.
• 10 Pytlinski J, Skorwider L, Bala P, Nazaruk M, Wawruch K. BioGRID – uniform platform for biomolecular applications. Euro-Par 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2002; 2400: 881.
• 11 Stevens RD, Robinson AJ, Goble CA. myGrid: Personalised Bioinformatics on the Information Grid. Bioinformatics 2003; 19 (01) i302-i304.
• 12 Cuda G. et al. Proteomic Profiling of Inherited Breast Cancer: Identification of Molecular Targets for Early Detection, Prognosis and Treatment, and Related Bioinformatics Tools. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2003; 2859: 245-57.