Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2005; 44(04): 590-595
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634013
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

A Decision-support System for Real-time Risk Assessment of Airborne Spread of the Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus

F. Rubel
1   Department of Natural Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria
,
K. Fuchs
2   Institute of Applied Statistics and System Analysis, Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: The application of epidemic models during the first days following the confirmation of a virus outbreak should significantly contribute to minimize its costs. Here we describe the first version of a decision-support system for the calculation of the airborne spread of a virus and its application to foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). The goal is to provide geographical maps depicting infection risk for various animal species to support the national health authorities.

Methods: The major tool of the decision-support system is a specific epidemic (or atmospheric) model: A so-called Gaussian dispersion model to calculate 3-dimensional virus plumes. Additional tools providing input data and visualizing the output are: A veterinary data base of geo-referenced premises, a geographical information system (GIS), and, as an external part running at the National Weather Service, a numerical weather prediction (NWP) model. To demonstrate the features of the decision-support system a pilot study in Styria, Austria, has been performed simulating an artificial FMD outbreak.

Results: One result of this simulation experiment is the determination of neighboring premises at which animals are at risk to be infected. Particular attention has been turned to cattle, sheep and swine. Using actual hourly NWP data from April 25, 2003, and a source of ten swine excreting a virus, cattle have been estimated to be at risk downwind 1,000-12,000 m, sheep 200-1,300 m, and swines 70-330 m.

Conclusions: A system for real-time risk assessment of the airborne spread of a virus, applied to FMD, was introduced. Due to the forcing of the Gaussian dispersion model with NWP data, it is designed to run in both analysis and forecast mode. The system was applied for the first time during the Austrian real-time exercise on FMD, instructed by the European Union, in November 2004.

Keywords

Risk assessment - airborne transmission of a virus - Gaussian dispersion model - foot-and-mouth disease - geographical information systems - veterinary epidemiology
 

  • References

  • 1 Rubel F. et al Estimation of Airborne Spread of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus. Proc. 5th Middle- European Congress for Buiatrics, June 2-5, 2004, Hajduszoboszlo, Hungary 2004: 12-7.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Gibbens JC. et al Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: The first five months. Vet Rec 2001; 149: 729-43.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Giles J. Delays allowed foot-and-mouth epidemic to sweep across Britain. Nature 2001; 410: 501
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Woolhouse M, Donaldson A. Managing foot-andmouth disease: The science of controlling disease outbreaks. Nature 2001; 410: 515-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ferguson NM. et al The foot-and-mouth epidemic in Great Britan: Pattern of spread and impact of interventions. Science 2001; 292: 1155-60.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kao RR. The role of mathematical modelling in the control of the 2001 FMD epidemic in the UK. Trends in Microbiol 2002; 10: 279-86.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Keeling MJ. et al Dynamics of the 2001 UK foot and mouth epidemic: Stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Science 2001; 294: 813-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Donaldson AI. et al Relative risk of the uncontrollable (airborne) spread of FMD by different species. Vet Rec 2001; 148: 602-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Donaldson AI, Alexandersen S. Predicting the spread of foot and mouth disease by airborne virus. Rev sci tech O int Epiz 2002; 21: 569-75.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sørensen JH. et al An integrated model to predict the atmospheric spread of FMD virus. Epidemiol Infect 2000; 124: 577-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gloster J. et al The 2001 UK epidemic of footand- mouth disease a meteorological review: Part 1. Weather 2004; 59: 8-11.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gloster J. et al The 2001 UK epidemic of footand- mouth disease a meteorological review: Part 2. Weather 2004; 59: 43-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mikkelsen T. et al Investigation of airborne footand- mouth disease virus transmission during lowwind conditions in the early phase of the UK 2001 epidemic. Atmos Chem Phys 2003; 3: 2101-10.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Champion HJ. et al Investigation of the possible spread of foot-and-mouth disease virus by the burning of animal carcases on open pyres. Vet Rec 2002; 151: 593-600.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jones R. et al Quantitative estimates of the risk of new outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease as a result of burning pyres. Vet Rec 2004; 154: 161-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Maragon S. et al The 1993 Italian foot-and-mouth disease epidemic: epidemiological features of the four outbreaks identified in Verona province (Veneto region). Vet Rec 1994; 135: 53-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Donaldson AI. et al Further investigations on the airborne excretion of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J Hyg Camb 1970; 69: 557-64.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Garner MG, Cannon RM. Potential for windborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease virus in Australia. Bureau of Resources Sciences, Australia 1995: 98
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Aggarwal A. et al Experimental studies with footand- mouth disease virus, strain O, responsible for the 2001 epidemic in the United Kingdom. Vaccine 2002; 20: 2508-15.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Alexandersen S. et al Quantities of infectious virus and viral RNA recovered from sheep and cattle experimentally infected with foot-andmouth disease virus O UK 2001. J General Virol 2002; 83: 1915-23.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Alexandersen S, Donaldson AI. Further studies to quantify the dose of natural aerosols of foot-andmouth disease virus for pigs. Epidemiol Infect 2002; 128: 313-23.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gloster J, Sellers RF, Donaldson AI. Long distance transport of foot-and-mouth disease virus over sea. Vet Rec 1982; 110: 47-52.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Sanson RL, Morris RS, Stern M. EpiMAN-FMD: A decision support system for managing epidemics of vesicular disease. Rev sci tech O int Epiz 1999; 18: 593-605.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Morris RS. et al Decision-support tools for FMD control. Rev sci tech Off int Epiz 2002; 21: 557-67.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 ÖNORM M9440: Ausbreitung von luftverunreinigenden Stoffen in der Atmosphäre (in German). Österr. Normungsinstitut: Wien; 1992: 20
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Schnelle KB, Dey PR. Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling Compliance Guide. Mc Graw Hill; New York: 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Fuchs K, Wagner P, Köfer J. VETGIS-Steiermark: Ein geographisches Informationssystem als Hilfsmittel für epidemiologische Fragestellungen im Veterinärwesen (in German). Wien Tierärztl Mschr 2000; 88: 246-51.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pfeiffer DU, Hugh-Jones M. Geographical information systems as a tool in epidemiological assessment and wildlife disease management. Rev sci tech Off int Epiz 2002; 21: 91-102.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Clarke KC, McLafferty SL, Templaski J. On Epidemiology and Geographic Information Systems: A review and discussion of future directions. Emerg Inf Dis 1996; 2: 85-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Durr R, Froggatt AEA. How best to geo-reference farms? A case study from Cornwall, England. Prev Vet Med 2002; 56: 51-62.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar