Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2005; 44(05): 626-630
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634018
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Record Linkage in the Cancer Registry of Tyrol, Austria

W. Oberaigner
1   Cancer Registry of Tyrol, Department of Clinical Epidemiology of the Tyrolean State Hospitals Ltd., Innsbruck, Austria
2   Department of Quality Science, Medical Planning and Information Management, University for Health Informatics and Technology Tyrol, Innsbruck, Austria
,
W. Stühlinger
2   Department of Quality Science, Medical Planning and Information Management, University for Health Informatics and Technology Tyrol, Innsbruck, Austria
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 09 February 2004

accepted: 20 December 2004

Publication Date:
07 February 2018 (online)

  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: Record linkage of patient data originating from various data sources and record linkage for checking uniqueness of patient registration are common tasks for every cancer registry. In Austria, there is no unique person identifier in use in the medical system. Hence, it was necessary and the goal of this work to develop an efficient means of record linkage for use in cancer registries in Austria.

Methods: We adapted the method of probabilistic record linkage to the situation of cancer registries in Austria. In addition to the customary components of this method, we also took into consideration typing errors commonly occurring in names and dates of birth. The method was implemented in a program written in DELPHITM with interfaces optimised for cancer registries.

Results: Applying our record linkage method to 130,509 linkages results in 105,272 (80.7%) identical pairs. For these identical pairs, 88.9% of decisions were performed automatically and 11.1% semi-automatically. For results decided automatically, 6.9% did not have simultaneous identity of last name, first name and date of birth. For results decided semi-automatically, 48.4% did not have an identical last name, 25.6% did not have an identical date of birth and 83.1% did not have simultaneous identity of last name and date of birth and first name.

Conclusions: The method implemented in our cancer registry solves all record linkage problems in Austria with sufficient precision.

Keywords

Probabilistic record linkage - cancer registry - homonym rate - synonym rate
 

  • References

  • 1 Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, Yuen J. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Volume VII. IARC Scientific Publications No. 143. Lyon: IARC. 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas B. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Volume VIII. IARC Scientific Publications No. 155. Lyon. 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Jensen OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, Muir CS, Skeet RG. Cancer Registration. Principles and Methods. Lyon: IARC; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Schouten LJ, Hoppener P, van den Brandt P, Knottnerus JA, Jager JJ. Completeness of Cancer Registration in Limburg, The Netherlands. Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22 (03) 369-76.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ziegler H, Stegmaier C. Bevölkerungsbezogene Krebsregistrierung in Deutschland. Onkologie 1996; 19: 268-77.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Calle EE, Terrell DD. Utility of the National Death Index for Ascertainment of Mortality among Cancer Prevention Study II Participants. Am J Epid 1993; 137 (02) 235-41.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fellegi IP, Sunter AB. A Theory for Record Linkage. JASA 1969; 64: 1183-1210.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jaro MA. Probabilistic Linkage of Large Public Health Data Files. Stat Med 1995; 14: 491-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Leitner H. Probleme und Lösungen beim Zusammenführen von Patientendaten unterschiedlicher Quellen. Innsbruck 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Stegmaier C, Ziegler H. Zusammenführung personenbezogener Informationen (Record-Linkage)– Probleme und Möglichkeiten am Beispiel des Krebsregisters Saarland. Krebsregister Saarland, Vierteljahresheft 1992; 4: 1-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Schmidtmann I, Michaelis J. Untersuchungen zum Record Linkage für das Krebsregister Rheinland- Pfalz. 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Brenner H, Schmidtmann I. Determinants of Homonym and Synonym Rates of Record Linkage in Disease Registration. Methods Inf Med 1996; 35 (01) 19-24.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Brenner H, Schmidtmann I, Stegmaier C. Effects of Record Linkage Errors on Registry-based Follow- up Studies. Stat Med 1997; 16 (23) 2633-43.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Newcombe HB, Smith ME, Howe GR, Mingay J, Strugnell A, Abbatt JD. Reliability of Computerized versus Manual Death Searches in a Study of Health of Eldorado Uranium Workers. Comput Biol Med 1983; 13 (03) 157-69.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 van den Brandt P, Schouten LJ. Development of a Record Linkage Protocol for Use in the Dutch Cancer Registry for Epidemiological Research. Int J Epid 1990; 19 (03) 553-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 MacLeod MC, Bray CA, Kendrick SW, Cobe S. Enhancing the Power of Record Linkage involving low quality Personal Identifiers: Use of the Best Link Principle and Cause of Death prior Likelihoods. Comput Biomed Res 1998; 31 (04) 257-70.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gomatam S, Carter R, Ariet M, Mitchell G. An empirical Comparison of Record Linkage Procedures. Stat Med 2002; 21 (10) 1485-96.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Thomas B, Newman M. Use of Commercial Record Linkage Software and Vital Statistics to Identify Patient Deaths. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4 (03) 233-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kendrick SW, Douglas MM, Gardner D, Hucker D. Best-link Matching of Scottish Health Data Sets. Methods Inf Med 1998; 37 (01) 64-8.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Oberaigner W, Kreienbrock L, Schaffrath-Rosario A, Kreuzer M, Wellmann J, Keller G, Gerken M, Langer B, Wichmann HE. Radon und Lungenkrebs im Bezirk Imst/Österreich. In Wichmann HE, Schlipkoeter HW, Fuelgraff G. (eds) Fortschritte in der Umweltmedizin. Landsberg/Lech: Ecomed Verlag; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Pommering K, Miller M, Schmidtmann I, Michaelis J. Pseudonyms for Cancer Registries. Methods Inf Med 1996; 35 (02) 112-21.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Meux E. Encrypting Personal Identifiers. Health Serv Res 1994; 29 (02) 247-256.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rabinowitz J. A Method for Preserving Confidentiality when Linking Computerized Registries. Am J Public Health 1998; 88 (05) 836
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kelman C, Smith L. It’s time: Record Linkage – The Vision and the Reality. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000; 24 (01) 100-1.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar