A Global Socio-economic-medico-legal Model for the Sustainability of Longitudinal Electronic Health Records

Summary

Objectives: This paper pursues the challenge of sustaining lifetime electronic health records (EHRs) based on a comprehensive socio-economic-medico-legal model. The notion of a lifetime EHR extends the emerging concept of a longitudinal and cross-institutional EHR and is invaluable information for increasing patient safety and quality of care.

Methods: The challenge is how to compile and sustain a coherent EHR across the lifetime of an individual. Several existing and hypothetical models are described, analyzed and compared in an attempt to suggest a preferred approach.

Results: The vision is that lifetime EHRs should be sustained by new players in the healthcare arena, who will function as independent health record banks (IHRBs). Multiple competing IHRBs would be established and regulated following preemptive legislation. They should be neither owned by healthcare providers nor by health insurer/payers or government agencies. The new legislation should also stipulate that the records located in these banks be considered the medico-legal copies of an individual’s records, and that healthcare providers no longer serve as the legal record keepers.

Conclusions: The proposed model is not centered on any of the current players in the field; instead, it is focussed on the objective service of sustaining individual EHRs, much like financial banks maintain and manage financial assets. This revolutionary structure provides two main benefits: 1) Healthcare organizations will be able to cut the costs of long-term record keeping, and 2) healthcare providers will be able to provide better care based on the availability of a lifelong EHR of their new patients.

Keywords

Social change - ethics - politics - economics - information medical record linkage

• References

• 1 Shabo A. A Global socio-economic-medico-legal Model for the Sustainability of Longitudinal Electronic Health Records. Part 1. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 240-5.
• 2 US Committee on Maintaining Privacy and Security in Health Care: For the Record: Protecting Electronic Health Information, part one. (1997). Available at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309056977/html/index.html Accessed February 28, 2005
• 3 Brailer D.. Report to the President by the USA Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. 2004. Available at http://hhs.gov/healthit/ Accessed February 28 2005
• 4 Li YC, Kuo HS, Jian WS, Tang DD, Liu CT, Liu L, Hsu CY, Tan YK, Hu CH. Building a generic architecture for medical information exchange among healthcare providers. Int J Med Inform 2001; 61 (02) (03) 241-6.
• 5 Yasnoff WA. et al A Consensus Action Agenda for Achieving the National Health Information Infrastructure. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11: 332-8. DOI 10.1197/jamia. M1616.
• 6 Rovinson JC, Casalino L. Vertical Integration and Organizational Networks in Health Care. Health Affairs 1996; 15 (01) 7-22.
• 7 Middleton B.. The Value of Healthcare Information Exchange and Interoperability. Cornerstones for Electronic Healthcare, 2004 Washington DC, July 20-23. 2004;
• 8 Karp S.. Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange. Cornerstones for Electronic Healthcare, 2004. Washington DC, July. 20-23. 2004;
• 9 PICNIC - Professionals and Citizens Network for Integrated Care. National and Regional Health Portals: Content - Web-services - Technology - Organisation. (A European Commission funded project in the fifth framework program. Available at http://www.medcom.dk/picnic/ Accessed February 28 2005
• 10 Ramsaroop P, Ball MJ. The Bank of Health: A Model for More Useful Patient Records. MD Comput 2000; 17 (04) 45-8.
• 11 Horsch A, Itälä T, Mikola T, Leonhardt P, Tobman M, Nätscher C, and Sußmann H.. CDA-based Integration of a Teleconsultation Service into a Regional Electronic Patient Record System. MIE 2003. Proceedings of the Medical Informatics Europe Congress, May 4-7, 2003, St Malo, France.
• 12 Spronk R.. The NPfIT Spine, an English national programme. 2003 Available at http://www.ringholm.de/docs/00970_en.htm Accessed February 28 2005
• 13 IHE (Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise) XDS (Cross-Enterprise Clinical Documents Sharing) Profile. Available online at http://www.rsna.org/IHE/tf/ihe_tf_index.shtml Accessed February 28 2005
• 14 Machan C, Ammenwerth E, Schabetsberger T. Evaluation of the electronic transmission of medical findings from hospitals to practitioners by triangulation. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 225-33.
• 15 Kim MI, Johnson KB. Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utility. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9 (02) 171-80.
• 16 Independent Health Record Banks Act introduced in the USA Senate and Congress. Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109: S. 3454 Accessed July 4 2006
• 17 Duftschmid G, Wrba T, Gall W, Dorda W. The Strategic Approach of Managing Healthcare Data Exchange in Austria. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43: 122-32.
• 18 Hubbard R, Wald RE. Exploding the Gene Myth: How Genetic Information Is Produced and Manipulated by Scientists, Physicians, Employers, Insurance Companies, Educators, and Law Enforcers. Boston: Beacon Press 1993
• 19 Sax U, Schmidt S. Integration of Genomic Data in Electronic Health Records - Opportunities and Dilemmas. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 546-50.
• 20 Aubert BA, Hamel G. Adoption of smart cards in the medical sector: the Canadian experience. Soc Sci Med 2001; 53 (07) 879-94.
• 21 QuickMedical, Personal Health Card. Available at http://quickmedical.com/LifeStream/smart_card.html Accessed February 28 2005
• 22 Wendt T, Häber A, Brigl B, Winter A. Modeling Hospital Information Systems (Part 2): Using the 3LGM2 Tool for Modeling Patient Record Management. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43: 256-67.
• 23 Bludau HB, Wolff A, Hochlehnert AJ. Presenting XML-based Medical Discharge Letters According to CDA. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42: 552-6.
• 24 Ammenwerth E, Shaw NT. Bad Health Informatics Can Kill - Is Evaluation the Answer?. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 1-3.
• 25 Beale T, Heard S, Kalra D, Lloyd D.. The Open- EHR Technical Roadmap. 2003 Available at http://www.openehr.org/ Accessed February 28 2005
• 26 The Good European Health Record (GEHR): Ethical and Legal Requirements, Deliverable 8, October 1993. Available at http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/HealthI/GEHR Accessed February 28 2005
• 27 Health Informatics - Electronic Health Record Definition, Scope, and Context. ISO Draft Technical Report 20514, Second Draft, August 2003. Available at http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/en/downloads/infostand_ihisd_isowg1_mtg_denoct_contextdraft.pdf Accessed February 28 2005
• 28 Schloeffel P, Jeselon P.. Standards Requirements for the Electronic Health Record & Discharge/Referral Plans. ISO/TC 215 EHR ad hoc Group, Final Report, July 2002. Available at http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/en/downloads/infostand_ ihisd_isowg1_finalreportJan03_e.pdf Accessed February 28 2005