Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1999; 38(03): 177-181
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634189
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of General Practice Computer Templates

Lessons from a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
S. See Tai
1   Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, The Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK
,
I. Nazareth
1   Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, The Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK
,
C. Donegan
1   Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, The Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK
,
A. Haines
1   Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, The Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

We conducted a pilot randomised trial of computerised templates for the management of asthma and diabetes in general practice in six general practices in North London. Uptake of the guidelines by general practitioners and practice nurses was assessed using qualitative (semi-structured interviews designed to assess the users’ views) and quantitative (change in use of the template during the study period) outcome measures. The practice nurses used the templates frequently but general practitioners rarely used them. Several reasons were offered for non-use of the templates, such as the length of the template and non-involvement in the care of asthma or diabetes. Despite this, however, health professionals were favourably disposed to the use of templates for general clinical care. Pilot investigations of computerised templates are best achieved by observational or quasi-experimental methods rather than a randomised controlled trial. The use of both qualitative and quantitative methods in this study allowed exploration of the barriers to use of computers.

Keywords

General Practice - Computers - Decision-support Systems - Templates - Randomised Studies
 

  • References

  • 1 Stroppe J, De Maeseneer J, Caanaeme R. A picture of primary health care in Europe. In: De Maeseneer J, Beolchi L. Telematics in Primary Care in Europe. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995: 1-30.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Sullivan F, Mitchell E. Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports. BMJ 1995; 311: 848-52.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Van DHJ, Van RJ. Preventive cardiology in general practice computer assisted hyper-tension care. J Human Hypertens 1990; 4: 365-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Perlinin S, Piepoli M, Marti G, Rabino A, Rota P, Compagnoni F. et al. Treatment of chronic heart failure: an expert system advisor for general practitioners. Acta Cardiol 1990; 45: 265-78.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hobbs FDR, Delaney BC, Carson A, Kenkre JE. A prospective controlled trial of computerised decision support for lipid management in primary care. Fam Pract 1995; 13: 133-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Selmi P, Klein M, Greist J, Sorrell S, Erdman H. Computer administered cognitive behavioural therapy for depression. Am J Psychiatr 1990; 147: 51-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes B, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patients outcome: a critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 135-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hasler J, Schofield T. eds. Continuing Care: the Management of Chronic Disease. Oxford: University Press; 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Department of Health.. Health promotion and chronic disease management. General Medical Services Statutes. 1992 Schedule 6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 The Royal College of General Practitioners.. The development and implementation of clinical guidelines; report of the clinical guidelines working group. 1995 report 26.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993; 342: 1317-22.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Haines A, Jones R. Implementing findings of research. BMJ 1994; 308: 1488-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 British Thoracic Society, British Paediatric Association, Unit of the Royal College of Physicians of London, King‘s Fund Centre, National Asthma Campaign, Royal, College of General Practitioners and British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine.. Guidelines on the management of asthma. Thorax 1993; 48: S1-S4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Report of the Joint Working Party of the British Diabetic Association, The Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of General Practitioners.. Guidelines for good practice in the diagnosis and treatment of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Royal Coll Phys London 1990; 27: 259-66.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interactions. Sage Publications; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Walton RT, Gierl C, Yudkin P, Mistry H, Vessey MP, Fox J. Evaluation of computer support for prescribing (CAPSULE) using simulated cases. BMJ 1997; 315: 791-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical guidelines. CMAJ 1997; 157: 408-16.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Grol R. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997; 315: 418-21.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, Russell I, Hurwitz B, Watt I, Long A, Sheldon T. Developing and implementing practice guidelines. Qual in Health Care 1995; 4: 55-64.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Thomson R, Lavender M, Madhok R. How to ensure that guidelines are effective. BMJ 1995; 311: 237-24.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 White P, Atherton A, Hewett G, Howells K. Using information from asthma patients: a trial of information feedback in primary care. BMJ 1995; 311: 1065-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Jones A, Cronin P, Bowen M. Comparison of risk factors for coronary heart disease among attenders and non attenders at a screening programme. Br J Gen Pract 1993; 43: 375-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar