Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2003; 42(04): 366-370
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634231
Original article
Schattauer GmbH

Big is Beautiful: Electronic Patient Records in Large Norwegian Hospitals 1980s – 2001

G. Ellingsen
1   University Hospital of Northern Norway, Breivika, Norway
,
E. Monteiro
2   IDI, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: This paper aims to describe and analyze the prolonged efforts – spanning close to two decades – of developing and using electronic patient records in the large, university-based hospitals in Norway.

Methods: This study belongs to an interpretative approach to the development and use of information systems.

Results: The increase in organizational, institutional, political and technological complexity has been seriously underestimated. This paper describes and analyses the prolonged efforts – spanning close to two decades – of developing and using EPRs in the large, university-based hospitals in Norway. The investments involved were considerable, implying that a crucial aspect of these efforts has been the way alliances have been forged with public institutions and agendas.

Conclusions: The conditions for small-scale, bottom-up and evolutionary approaches never succeeded in constructing themselves as a viable alternative to the larger, more sweeping electronic patient record initiative, reiterating a more general tendency to privilege the more comprehensive and daring projects.

Keywords

Electronic patient record systems - evolutionary approach - large hospitals - development strategies
 

  • References

  • 1 Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center I: impact on organizational culture and behavior. Academic Medicine 1993; 68: 20-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kushniruk AW, Kaufman DR, Patel VL, Levesque Y, Lottin P. Assessment of a computerized patient record system, a cognitive approach to evaluating medical technology. MD Computing 1996; 13: 406-15.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Safran DZ, Sands DZ, Rind DM. Online medical records, a decade of experience. Meth Inf Med 1999; 38: 308-12.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sands DZ, Libman H, Safran C. Meeting information needs, analysis of clinicians’ use of an HIV database through an electronic medical record. Medinfo 1995; 8: 323-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lærum H, Ellingsen G, Faxvaag A. Doctors’ use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey. BMJ 2001; 323: 1344-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Klein H, Myers M. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 1999; 23: 67-94.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Walsham G. Interpreting information systems in organizations. Chichester: Wiley; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Latour B. Pandora’s hope, essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Bowker G, Star SL. Sorting things out, classification and its consequences. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Ellingsen G, Monteiro E. A patchwork planet, integration and cooperation in hospitals. Comp Supp Coop Work 2003; 12: 71-95.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar