Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2003; 42(04): 451-457
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634348
Original article
Schattauer GmbH

Teleconsultation: Rejected and Emerging Uses

C. Sicotte
1   Department of Health Administration, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
,
P. Lehoux
1   Department of Health Administration, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: The aim of this paper is to analyse telemedicine as a new means to improve health care accessibility.

Method: A case study design was used to understand how medical specialists perceived, made sense of, and appropriated a teleconsultation system.

Results and Conclusions: The technology was used neither in the manner nor to the extent anticipated by its designers. A fundamental modification to the traditional medical consultation process has emerged. Unable to be used as a substitute to the traditional medical consultation process, the teleconsultation system imposes a greater burden on the shoulders of participating physicians who, after a few trials, returned to their traditional mode of practice.

Keywords

Telemedicine - teleconsultation - users’ mediated use - information and communication technology (ICT)
 

  • References

  • 1 Watts LA, Monk AF. Telemedicine, what happens in remote consultation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1999; 15, 1: 220-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wootton R, Craig J. eds. Introduction to telemedicine. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bashshur RL. Critical issues in telemedicine. Telemedicine Journal 1997; 3, 2: 113-26.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Field MJ. editor. Telemedicine. A guide to assessing telecommunications in health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D. Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2001; 165: 765-71.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wootton R. Recent advances in telemedicine. BMJ 2001; 323: 557-60.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 DeSanctis G, Scott Poole M. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use, adaptive structuration theory. Organisation Science 1994; 2: 121-47.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lewis LK, Seibold DR. Innovation modification during intraorganisational adoption. Academy of Management Review 1993; 18: 322-54.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Williams R, Edge D. The social shaping of technology. Research Policy 1996; 25: 865-99.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Simon HA. The new science of management decision. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1977
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Simon HA. Administrative Behaviour. A study of decision-making processes in administrative organisation. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press; 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Akrich M. User representations, practices, methods and sociology. In: Rip A, Misa TJ, Schot J. editors. Managing technology in society, the approach of constructive technology assessment. London: Pinter; 1995. pp. 205-24.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Barley SR. Technology as an occasion for structuring, evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 1986; 31: 78-108.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Barley SR. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990; 35: 61-103.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Prasad P. Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change, a symbolic interactionist study of work computerization.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 00 Academy of Management Journal 1993; 36: 1400-29.
    CrossrefPubMed
  • 16 Giddens A. The constitution of society, outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1984
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Hagendijk R. Structuration theory, constructivism, and scientific change. In: Cozzens S, Gieryn T. editors. Theories of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1991. pp. 43-67.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Orlikowski WJ. The duality of technology, rethinking the concept of technology in organisations. Organisation Science 1992; 3: 398-427.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lehoux P, Sicotte C, Denis JL, Berg M, Lacroix A. Trust as a key component in the use of tele-consultation. Annals of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 2000; 33: 482-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sicotte C, Denis JL, Lehoux P, Champagne F. The computer based patient record, challenges towards timeless and spaceless medical practice. Journal of Medical Systems 1998; 22: 237-56.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Yin RK. Case study research, design and methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Lehoux P, Sicotte C, Denis JL, Berg M, Lacroix A. The theory of use behind telemedicine, how compatible with physicians’ clinical routines?. Social Science & Medicine 2002; 54: 889-904.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Farand L, Lafrance J-P, Arocha J. Collaborative problem-solving in telemedicine and evidence-based reasoning in complex clinical cases. Int J Med Inf 1998; 51: 153-67.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wootton R. Telemedicine, a cautious welcome. BMJ 1996; 313: 1375-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar