Methods Inf Med 1999; 38(04/05): 260-264
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634420
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

An Approach to Policy Analysis and Development of Medical Informatics

M. Power
1   Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town and Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 February 2018 (online)

Abstract

There are three grand challenges for medical informatics policy: (1) What is it? (2) What should it be? (3) How can we influence its development? To address these challenges requires: (1) an historical analysis of medical informatics policies in a representative sample of countries. This should include an account of major events, the roles of technology, individuals, culture and social settings. Pioneers have been led by visions of what medical informatics should achieve. The role of these visions and the reactions to unmet expectations thus also need to be analysed; (2) a generally applicable medical informatics policy that places the needs of its stake-holders and clients first. Top priorities are to support quality health care delivery and quality management of health care facilities; (3) an explanation of how policies in medical informatics are created and implemented together with a strategy to guide medical informatics professionals in their lobbying efforts.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Kaplan B. The computer prescription: Medical computing, public policy and views of history. Science, Technology & Human Values 1995; 20: 5-38.
  • 2 Coiera E. Guide to Medical Informatics, the Internet and Telemedicine . Chapman and Hall; London: 1997
  • 3 Feigenbaum EA. Autoknowledge: From file servers to knowledge servers. In: Salomon R, Blum B. Jørgensen, eds. MEDINFO 86: Fifth Conference on Medical Informatics . Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1986: xliii-xl.
  • 4 Sittig D. Grand challenges in medical informatics?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 412-3.
  • 5 Friede A. Correspondence: Grand challenges in medical informatics?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 2: 136.
  • 6 Department of Health.. The new NHS. Modern. Dependable. HMSO Dec 1997 http://www.official-documents.co.uk/document/doh/newnhs/newnhs.htm.
  • 7 Shortliffe EH, Bleich HL, Caine CG, Masys Dr, Simborg DW. The federal role in the Health Information Infrastructure: A debate of the pros and cons of government intervention. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3: 249-57.
  • 8 Walt G. Health Policy: An introduction to power and process . London, Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, and London Zed Books; 1994
  • 9 Keen J. Information policy in the National Health Service. In: Keen J. ed. Information management in health services . Buckingham: Open University Press; 1994
  • 10 Chambers R. Rural development: Putting the last first. Cited in Emanual de Kadt. Making health policy management intersectoral: Issues of information analysis and use in less developed countries. Social Science and Medicine 1989; 29 (Suppl. 04) 503-14.
  • 11 Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions . Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962