Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11(05): 273-282
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748053
Original Article

Toward a More Ecologically Valid Measure of Speech Understanding in Background Noise

James Jerger
School of Human Development, Program in Cognitive and Neurosciences, and the Callier Center for Communicative Disorders, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas
,
Ralf Greenwald
School of Human Development, Program in Cognitive and Neurosciences, and the Callier Center for Communicative Disorders, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas
,
Ilse Wambacq
School of Human Development, Program in Cognitive and Neurosciences, and the Callier Center for Communicative Disorders, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas
,
Amanda Seipel
School of Human Development, Program in Cognitive and Neurosciences, and the Callier Center for Communicative Disorders, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas
,
Deborah Moncrieff
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Florida
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

In an attempt to develop a more ecologically valid measure of speech understanding in a background of competing speech, we constructed a quasidichotic procedure based on the monitoring of continuous speech from loudspeakers placed directly to the listener's right and left sides. The listener responded to the presence of incongruous or anomalous words imbedded within the context of two children's fairy tales. Attention was directed either to the right or to the left side in blocks of 25 utterances. Within each block, there were target (anomalous) and nontarget (nonanomalous) words. Responses to target words were analyzed separately for attend-right and attend-left conditions. Our purpose was twofold: (1) to evaluate the feasibility of such an approach for obtaining electrophysiologic performance measures in the sound field and (2) to gather normative interaural symmetry data for the new technique in young adults with normal hearing. Event-related potentials to target and nontarget words at 30 electrode sites were obtained in 20 right-handed young adults with normal hearing. Waveforms and associated topographic maps were characterized by a slight negativity in the region of 400 msec (N400) and robust positivity in the region of 900 msec (P900). Norms for interaural symmetry of the P900 event-related potential in young adults were derived.

Abbreviations: CVC = consonant-vowel-consonant, EEG = electroencephalic, ERP = event-related potential, ISI = interaural symmetry index, VEOG = vertical electro-oculography

Key Words

Dichotic - event-related potential - speech competition


Publication History

Article published online:
07 April 2022

© 2000. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • REFERENCES

  • Boliek C, Obrzut J, Shaw D. (1988). The effect of hemis-patial and asymmetrically focused attention on dichotic listening with normal and learning-disabled children. Neuropsychologia 26:417–433.
  • Carhart R. (1946). Tests for the selection of hearing aids. Laryngoscope 56:780—794.
  • Cole M, Hood L, McDermott R. (1997). Concepts of ecological validity: their differing implications for comparative cognitive research. In: Cole M, Engstrom Y, Vasquez O, eds. Mind, Culture, and Activity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 49–56.
  • Coulson S, King J, Kutas M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language & Cognitive Processes 13:21–58.
  • Egan J. (1948). Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope 58:955–991.
  • Flynn M, Dowell R. (1999). Speech perception in a communicative context: an investigation using question/ answer pairs. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42:540–552.
  • Friederici A, Pfeifer E, Hahne Α. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research 1:183–192.
  • Gunter Τ, Stowe L, Mulder G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology 34:660–676.
  • Hall J. (1992). Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Hansen JC, Hillyard SA. (1980). Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 49: 277–290.
  • Herning R, Jones R, Hunt J. (1987). Speech event related potentials reflect linguistic content and processing level. Brain Lang 30:116–129.
  • Jasper H. (1958). The ten-twenty electode system of the International Federation. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 10:371–375.
  • Juottonen K, Revonsuo A, Lang H. (1996). Dissimilar age influences on two ERP waveforms (LPC and N400) reflecting semantic context effect. Cognitive Brain Research 4:99–107.
  • Kraus Ν, McGee Τ, SharmaA, Carrell T, Nicol T. (1992). Mismatch negativity event-related potential to speech stimuli. Ear Hear 13:158–164.
  • Kutas M, Hilyard S. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207:203–205.
  • McCallum W, Farmer S, Pocock P. (1984). The effects of physical and semantic incongruities on auditory event-related potentials. EEG Clin Neurophys 59:477–488.
  • Naantanen R. (1982). Processing negativity: an evoked potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol Bull 92: 605–640.
  • Neville H. (1985). Brain potentials reflect meaning in language. Trends Neurosci 8:91–92.
  • O'Halloran JP, Isenhart R, Sandman CA, Larkey LS. (1988). Brain responses to semantic anomaly in natural, continuous speech. Int J Psychopshysiol 6:243–254.
  • Osterhout L. (1992). Event-related potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. J Mem Lang 31:785—806.
  • Osterhout L, Hagoort P. (1999). A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family: counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate. Language & Cognitive Processes 14:1–14.
  • Osterhout L, Holcomb P. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language & Cognitive Processes 8:413–437.
  • Rugg M. (1984). Event-related potentials and the phonological processing of words and nonwords. Neuropsychologia 22:435–443.
  • Sbordone R. (1997). The ecological validity of neuropsychological testing. In: Horton A, Wedding D, Webster J, eds. The Neuropsychology Handbook. Vol 1. 2nd Ed. New York: Springer, 365–392.