PDF herunterladen
Am J Perinatol 2023; 40(15): 1611-1617
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748163
Review Article

Pulse Oximetry and Perfusion Index Screening for Congenital Heart Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

S. L. Jiang 
1   Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Obstetric & Gynecologic and Pediatric Diseases and Birth Defects of Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
,
Y. J. Zhan
1   Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Obstetric & Gynecologic and Pediatric Diseases and Birth Defects of Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
,
P. Yan
2   Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Alley, Wu Hou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
,
Y. Yue
1   Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Obstetric & Gynecologic and Pediatric Diseases and Birth Defects of Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
,
J. Tang
1   Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Obstetric & Gynecologic and Pediatric Diseases and Birth Defects of Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
› Institutsangaben Funding This work was supported by the grants from the Science and Technology Bureau of Sichuan Province (grant no.: 2020YJ0236), the grants from the National Science Foundation of China (grant nos.: os. 81630038 and 81971433), the grant from Ministry of Education of China [IRT0935], and the grant of clinical discipline program (Neonatology) from the Ministry of Health of China (grant no.: 1311200003303). All the funds belong to Jun Tang.
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most common neonatal malformations and are a leading cause of infant death in developed countries. Finding safe and effective diagnostic methods to screen for CHDs is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pulse oximetry (PO) and perfusion index (PI) in screening CHD. We conducted a systematic review of studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library published on or before October 1, 2021. Studies based on PICOS were included in this systematic review. The flow chart is made by PRISMA software. The quality of included studies was assessed by RevMan5 software (QUADAS-2: Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2). The sensitivity, specificity, and other measurements of accuracy were pooled using Stata/SE 12.0 software. Five studies containing 46,965 neonates were included in this study. A randomized-effects model was used for the meta-analysis because of significant heterogeneity. The combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53–0.95) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.57–1.00), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89–0.94). The combination PO and PI was significant in CHD screening. Once diagnosed by the combined method, it means that the neonate is most likely to have a CHD.

Key Points

  • Pulse oximetry and PI screening.

  • Congenital heart defects.

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Keywords

congenital heart defect - screening - newborn - perfusion index

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 26. Oktober 2021

Angenommen: 04. März 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. Mai 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • Reference

  • 1 van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA. et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58 (21) 2241-2247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Mahle WT, Newburger JW, Matherne GP. et al; American Heart Association Congenital Heart Defects Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research, American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, and Committee on Fetus and Newborn.. Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation 2009; 120 (05) 447-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Raissadati A, Nieminen H, Haukka J, Sairanen H, Jokinen E. Late causes of death after pediatric cardiac surgery: a 60-year population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68 (05) 487-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Knowles R, Griebsch I, Dezateux C, Brown J, Bull C, Wren C. Newborn screening for congenital heart defects: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9 (44) 1-152 , iii–iv
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wren C, Reinhardt Z, Khawaja K. Twenty-year trends in diagnosis of life-threatening neonatal cardiovascular malformations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008; 93 (01) F33-F35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 de-Wahl Granelli A, Wennergren M, Sandberg K. et al. Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39,821 newborns. BMJ 2009; 338: a3037
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Secretary of Health and Human Services Letter to the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC). September 21, 2011. Accessed March 20, 2019 at: https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/advisory-committees/heritable-disorders/reports-recommendations/response-congenital-cyanotic.pdf
    PubMed
  • 8 Kemper AR, Mahle WT, Martin GR. et al. Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 2011; 128 (05) e1259-e1267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ewer AK, Middleton LJ, Furmston AT. et al; PulseOx Study Group. Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects in newborn infants (PulseOx): a test accuracy study. Lancet 2011; 378 (9793): 785-794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Thangaratinam S, Brown K, Zamora J, Khan KS, Ewer AK. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in asymptomatic newborn babies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012; 379 (9835): 2459-2464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Thangaratinam S, Daniels J, Ewer AK, Zamora J, Khan KS. Accuracy of pulse oximetry in screening for congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92 (03) F176-F180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Schena F, Picciolli I, Agosti M. et al; Neonatal Cardiology Study Group of the Italian Society of Neonatology. Perfusion index and pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects. J Pediatr 2017; 183: 74-79.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ailes EC, Gilboa SM, Honein MA, Oster ME. Estimated number of infants detected and missed by critical congenital heart defect screening. Pediatrics 2015; 135 (06) 1000-1008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lannering K, Bartos M, Mellander M. Late diagnosis of coarctation despite prenatal ultrasound and postnatal pulse oximetry. Pediatrics 2015; 136 (02) e406-e412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Riede FT, Schneider P. Most wanted, least found: coarctation. Concerning the article by J.I.E. Hoffman: It is time for routine neonatal screening by pulse oximetry [Neonatology 2011;99:1-9]. Neonatology 2012; 101 (01) 13 , author reply 13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mouledoux JH, Walsh WF. Evaluating the diagnostic gap: statewide incidence of undiagnosed critical congenital heart disease before newborn screening with pulse oximetry. Pediatr Cardiol 2013; 34 (07) 1680-1686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Granelli Ad, Ostman-Smith I. Noninvasive peripheral perfusion index as a possible tool for screening for critical left heart obstruction. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96 (10) 1455-1459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lima A, Bakker J. Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31 (10) 1316-1326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Corsini I, Cecchi A, Coviello C, Dani C. Perfusion index and left ventricular output correlation in healthy term infants. Eur J Pediatr 2017; 176 (08) 1013-1018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Uygur O, Koroglu OA, Levent E. et al. The value of peripheral perfusion index measurements for early detection of critical cardiac defects. Pediatr Neonatol 2019; 60 (01) 68-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ramesh S, Kumutha J. Role Of perfusion index in pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease in neonates. Indian J Child Health 2018; 5 (03) 200-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Siefkes H, Kair L, Tancredi DJ. et al. Oxygen saturation and perfusion index-based enhanced critical congenital heart disease screening. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (02) 158-165
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Tekgündüz KŞ, Bilen M, Kara M, Laloğlu F, Ceviz N. Oxygen saturation and perfusion index screening in neonates at high altitudes: can PDA be predicted?. Eur J Pediatr 2021; 180 (01) 31-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Thangaratinam S, Brown K, Zamora J, Khan KS, Ewer AK. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in asymptomatic newborn babies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012; 379 (9835): 2459-2464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Aranguren Bello HC, Londoño Trujillo D, Troncoso Moreno GA. et al. Oximetry and neonatal examination for the detection of critical congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000 Res 2019; 8: 242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pan C, Zou X, Chen G, Wang T, Jiang X, Chen J. The role of physical examination, pulse oximetry screening, and perfusion index in screening of neonatal congenital heart disease. J Clinical Pediatrics 2018; 12: 166-169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar