Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11(10): 561-569
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748201
Original Article

Predicting Directional Hearing Aid Benefit for Individual Listeners

Todd Ricketts
Dan Maddox Hearing Aid Research Laboratory, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
,
H. Gustav Mueller
Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center for Otolaryngology and Communication Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The fitting of directional microphone hearing aids is becoming increasingly more routine, and this fitting option has proven to be a successful method to improve speech intelligibility in many noisy listening environments. Data suggest, however, that some hearing-impaired listeners receive significantly more directional benefit than others. It is of interest, therefore, to determine if directional benefit is predictable from identifiable audiologic factors. In this report, we examined whether the slope of audiometric configuration, amount of high-frequency hearing loss, and/or the aided omnidirectional performance for a speech-in-noise intelligibility task could be used to predict the magnitude of directional hearing aid benefit. Overall results obtained from three separate investigations revealed no significant correlation between the slope of audiometric configuration or amount of high-frequency hearing loss and the benefit obtained from directional microphone hearing instruments. Although there was a significant, negative relationship between aided omnidirectional performance and the directional benefit obtained in one study, there was considerable variability among individual participants, and nearly all of the listeners with the best omnidirectional hearing aid performance still received significant additional benefit from directional amplification. These results suggest that audiologists should consider the use of directional amplification for patients regardless of audiogram slope, high-frequency hearing loss, or omnidirectional speech intelligibility score.

Abbreviations: BTE = behind the ear, Dl = Directivity Index, DSP = digital signal processing, HINT = Hearing in Noise Test, ITE = in the ear, NAL-NL1 = National Acoustic Laboratories-Nonlinear 1, SNR = signal-to-noise ratio

Key Words

Benefit prediction - directional microphones - Directivity Index - hearing aids


Publication History

Article published online:
20 April 2022

© 2000. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • REFERENCES

  • Bentler RA. (1999, May). SNR Lost/Found: Lab /Real-World Performance of Directional Microphones. Presented at the American Academy of Audiology Annual Convention, Miami Beach, FL.
  • Hawkins DB, Yacullo WS. (1984). Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Disord 49:278–286.
  • Killion MC. (1997). SNR loss: I can hear what people say, but I can't understand them. Hear Rev 4(12):8, 10, 12, 14.
  • Killion MC, Christensen LA. (1998). The case of the missing dots: AI and SNR loss. Hear J 51(5):32, 34, 36, 40–41, 44, 46–47.
  • Killion MC, Schuhen R, Christensen L, Fabry D, Revit L, Niquette P, Chung K. (1998). Real world performance of an ITE directional microphone. Hear J 51(4):24–26, 30, 32–36, 38.
  • Moncur JP, Dirks D. (1967). Binaural and monaural speech intelligibility in reverberation. J Speech Hear Res 10:186–195.
  • Mueller HG, Ricketts TA. (2000). Directional microphone hearing aids: an update. Hear J 53(5): 10–19.
  • Mueller HG, Wesselkamp M. (1999). Ten commonly asked questions about directional microphone fittings. Hear Rev 3(Suppl):26–30.
  • Nabelek AK, Mason D. (1981). Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms. J Speech Hear Res 24:375–383.
  • Nilsson MJ, Soli SD, Sullivan J. (1994). Development of a Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 95:1985–1999.
  • Preves D. (1997). Directional microphone use in ITE hearing instruments. Hear Rev 4(7):21–22, 24–27.
  • Ricketts TA. (2000a). Directivity quantification in hearing aids: fitting and measurement effects. Ear Hear 21:45–58.
  • Ricketts TA. (2000b). Impact of noise source configuration on directional hearing aid benefit and performance. Ear Hear 21:194–205.
  • Ricketts TA, Dahr S. (1999). Aided benefit across directional and omnidirectional hearing aid microphones for behind-the-ear hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 10:180–189.
  • Ricketts TA, Mueller G. (1999). Making sense of directional microphone performance. Am J Audiol 8:117–127.
  • Ricketts TA, Lindley G, Henry PP. (2000, March). Directional Microphone Hearing Aids: Fitting Considerations for Adults. Paper presented as part of Directional Microphone Hearing Aids: Fitting Considerations for Adults and Children (Ricketts TA, Gravel J), American Academy of Audiology Annual Convention, Chicago.
  • Schum D. (1996). Speech understanding in background noise. In: Valente Μ, ed. Hearing Aids: Standards, Options, and Limitations. New York: Thieme, 368–406.
  • Turner CW, Cummings KJ. (1999). Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Am J Audiol 8:1–11.
  • Veit I, Sander H. (1985). Production of Spatially Limited Diffuse Sound Field in an Anechoic Room. Presented at the 77th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, Hamburg, Germany.