Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35(06): 453-457
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758135
Review Article

The Evolution of Pelvic Pouch Surgery: Optimal Pouch Design for an Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis

Jennifer L. Miller-Ocuin
1   Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
,
David W. Dietz
1   Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The history of pouch surgery is rooted in surgical innovation to improve quality of life in patients requiring surgical extirpation of the colon and rectum. From the early straight ileoanal anastomosis to the continent ileostomy to the modern ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA), techniques have evolved in response to pitfalls in design. Optimal IPAA design and construction have changed in response to functional outcomes. Nowadays, restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA is the optimal treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. The J-pouch with stapled anastomosis has become the preferred procedure. Historical configurations and technical pearls, as described in this article, should be considered by surgeons who regularly care for patients requiring ileal pouch surgery.



Publication History

Article published online:
04 November 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. BMJ 1978; 2 (6130): 85-88
  • 2 Brown J. The value of complete physiological rest of the large bowel in the treatment of certain ulcerative and obstructive lesions of this organ. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1913; 16: 610
  • 3 Crile Jr G, Turnbull Jr RB. The mechanism and prevention of ileostomy dysfunction. Ann Surg 1954; 140 (04) 459-466
  • 4 Cattell RB. Surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Postgrad Med 1953; 14 (03) 221-225
  • 5 Warner E, Taylor S. Meeting of the Section of Proctology of the Royal Society of Medicine with the American Proctological Society. London: Proc R Soc Med; 1959. 52. (Suppl 3): 31
  • 6 Nissen R. Sitzungsberichte aus Chirurgischen Gesellschaften Berliner Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. Zentralbl Chir 1933; 60: 888
  • 7 Ravitch MM, Sabiston Jr DC. Anal ileostomy with preservation of the sphincter; a proposed operation in patients requiring total colectomy for benign lesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1947; 84 (06) 1095-1099
  • 8 Ravitch MM. Anal ileostomy with sphincter preservation in patients requiring total colectomy for benign conditions. Surgery 1948; 24 (02) 170-187
  • 9 Valiente MA, Bacon HE. Construction of pouch using pantaloon technic for pull-through of ileum following total colectomy; report of experimental work and results. Am J Surg 1955; 90 (05) 742-750
  • 10 Kock NG. Intra-abdominal “reservoir” in patients with permanent ileostomy. Preliminary observations on a procedure resulting in fecal “continence” in five ileostomy patients. Arch Surg 1969; 99 (02) 223-231
  • 11 Kock NG. [Continent ileostomy after proctocolectomy (author's transl)]. Ther Umsch 1973; 30 (12) 850-853 Die kontinente Ileostomie nach Proktokolektomie.
  • 12 Kock NG. [Evolution of urinary bladder substitution]. Arch Esp Urol 1992; 45 (09) 891-895 Evolucion de la sustitucion de la vejiga urinaria.
  • 13 Barnett WO. Modified techniques for improving the continent ileostomy. Am Surg 1984; 50 (02) 66-69
  • 14 Devine J, Webb R. Resection of the rectal mucosa, colectomy, and anal ileostomy with normal continence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1951; 92 (04) 437-442
  • 15 Peck DA, German JD, Jackson FC. Rectal resection for benign disease: a new technic. Dis Colon Rectum 1966; 9 (05) 363-366
  • 16 Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M. et al. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1980; 23 (07) 459-466
  • 17 Dozois RR, Goldberg SM, Rothenberger DA. et al. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986; 1 (01) 2-19
  • 18 Fazio VW, O'Riordain MG, Lavery IC. et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg 1999; 230 (04) 575-584 , discussion 584–586
  • 19 Heald RJ, Allen DR. Stapled ileo-anal anastomosis: a technique to avoid mucosal proctectomy in the ileal pouch operation. Br J Surg 1986; 73 (07) 571-572
  • 20 Kmiot WA, Keighley MR. Totally stapled abdominal restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1989; 76 (09) 961-964
  • 21 Kirat HT, Remzi FH, Kiran RP, Fazio VW. Comparison of outcomes after hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 3,109 patients. Surgery 2009; 146 (04) 723-729 , discussion 729–730
  • 22 Nicholls RJ, Lubowski DZ. Restorative proctocolectomy: the four loop (W) reservoir. Br J Surg 1987; 74 (07) 564-566
  • 23 McCormick PH, Guest GD, Clark AJ. et al. The ideal ileal-pouch design: a long-term randomized control trial of J- vs W-pouch construction. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (12) 1251-1257
  • 24 Lovegrove RE, Heriot AG, Constantinides V. et al. Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9 (04) 310-320
  • 25 Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG. et al. A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg 2006; 244 (01) 18-26
  • 26 Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Delaney CP. et al. Dysplasia of the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: results of prospective evaluation after a minimum of ten years. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46 (01) 6-13
  • 27 Kirat HT, Remzi FH. Technical aspects of ileoanal pouch surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2010; 23 (04) 239-247
  • 28 Zhang Y, Hu H, Jiang C, Qian Q, Ding Z. D-pouch: a modified ileal J-pouch for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Tech Coloproctol 2021; 25 (11) 1209-1215
  • 29 Fonkalsrud EW. Endorectal ileoanal anastomosis with isoperistaltic ileal reservoir after colectomy and mucosal proctectomy. Ann Surg 1984; 199 (02) 151-157
  • 30 Church J. The implications of pouch physiology. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62 (04) 510-512
  • 31 Aydinli HH, Peirce C, Aytac E, Remzi F. The usefulness of the H-pouch configuration in salvage surgery for failed ileal pouches. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19 (08) e312-e315
  • 32 Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Kirat HT, Wu JS, Lavery IC, Kiran RP. Repeat pouch surgery by the abdominal approach safely salvages failed ileal pelvic pouch. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52 (02) 198-204
  • 33 Remzi FH, Aytac E, Ashburn J. et al. Transabdominal redo ileal pouch surgery for failed restorative proctocolectomy: lessons learned over 500 patients. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (04) 675-682
  • 34 Kirat HT, Kiran RP, Oncel M, Shen B, Fazio VW, Remzi FH. Management of leak from the tip of the “J” in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (04) 454-459
  • 35 Pappou EP, Kiran RP. The failed J pouch. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2016; 29 (02) 123-129
  • 36 Uraiqat AA, Byrne CM, Phillips RK. Gaining length in ileal-anal pouch reconstruction: a review. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9 (07) 657-661