Int J Angiol
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1780536
Review Article

Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of a Controversial Entity

Karan Sarode
1   Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas
,
1   Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas
,
Kedzie Arrington
1   Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas
,
Rakhee Makhija
1   Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas
,
1   Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Pericardial decompression syndrome is an ambiguous clinical entity which has generated controversy regarding its existence. Following pericardial decompression, patients experienced clinical deterioration ranging in complications from pulmonary edema to death that could not be attributed to any other distinct clinical pathology. Multiple theories have suggested the pathophysiology behind pericardial decompression syndrome is related to preload-afterload mismatch following pericardial decompression, coronary microvascular ischemia, and stress from high adrenergic state. Our review aims to describe this syndrome by analyzing demographics, etiology of pericardial effusion, method of drainage, volume of pericardial fluid removed, time to decompensation, and clinical outcomes. A systematic review of MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar literature databases were queried for case reports, case series, review articles, and abstracts published in English journals between 1983 and December 2022. Each author's interpretation of echocardiographic and/or pulmonary arterial catheterization data provided in the case reports was used to characterize ventricular dysfunction. Based on our inclusion criteria, 72 cases of pericardial decompression syndrome were included in our review. Our results showed that phenotypic heterogeneity was present based on echocardiographic findings of right/left or biventricular failure with similar proportions in each type of ventricular dysfunction. Time to decompensation was similar between immediate, subacute, and acute cases with presentation varying between hypoxic respiratory failure and shock. This review article highlights theories behind the pathophysiology, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic options in this high mortality condition.



Publication History

Article published online:
16 February 2024

© 2024. International College of Angiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Alerhand S, Adrian RJ, Long B, Avila J. Pericardial tamponade: a comprehensive emergency medicine and echocardiography review. Am J Emerg Med 2022; 58: 159-174
  • 2 Revere DJ, Makaryus AN, Bonaros Jr EP, Graver LM. Chylopericardium presenting as cardiac tamponade secondary to an anterior mediastinal cystic teratoma. Tex Heart Inst J 2007; 34 (03) 379-382
  • 3 Restrepo CS, Lemos DF, Lemos JA. et al. Imaging findings in cardiac tamponade with emphasis on CT. Radiographics 2007; 27 (06) 1595-1610
  • 4 Imazio M, Adler Y. Management of pericardial effusion. Eur Heart J 2013; 34 (16) 1186-1197
  • 5 Pradhan R, Okabe T, Yoshida K, Angouras DC, DeCaro MV, Marhefka GD. Patient characteristics and predictors of mortality associated with pericardial decompression syndrome: a comprehensive analysis of published cases. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2015; 4 (02) 113-120
  • 6 Sobieski C, Herner M, Goyal N. et al. Pericardial decompression syndrome after drainage of chronic pericardial effusions. JACC Case Rep 2022; 4 (22) 1515-1521
  • 7 Thabet C, MacDonald Z, Johnson C, Niznick J, Garuba HA, Law A. Pericardial decompression syndrome: a case series and literature review. CJC Open 2021; 4 (04) 420-423
  • 8 Abdelmalek J, Abohelwa MM, Elmassry M, Ansari MM. A case of pericardial decompression syndrome following surgical pericardial fluid drainage. Cureus 2021; 13 (07) e16631
  • 9 Curiale A, Vallabhaneni S, Longo S, Shirani J. Massive left ventricular thrombosis in pericardial decompression syndrome. Echocardiography 2021; 38 (08) 1471-1473
  • 10 Chung J, Ocken L, Wolo E, Herman CR, Goldhammer JE. Acute right ventricular failure after surgical drainage of pericardial tamponade: a case report of pericardial decompression syndrome and review of the literature. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33 (03) 768-771
  • 11 Prabhakar Y, Goyal A, Khalid N. et al. Pericardial decompression syndrome: a comprehensive review. World J Cardiol 2019; 11 (12) 282-291
  • 12 Vandyke Jr WH, Cure J, Chakko CS, Gheorghiade M. Pulmonary edema after pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade. N Engl J Med 1983; 309 (10) 595-596
  • 13 Angouras DC, Dosios T. Pericardial decompression syndrome: a term for a well-defined but rather underreported complication of pericardial drainage. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89 (05) 1702-1703 , author reply 1703
  • 14 Shenoy MM, Dhar S, Gittin R, Sinha AK, Sabado M. Pulmonary edema following pericardiotomy for cardiac tamponade. Chest 1984; 86 (04) 647-648
  • 15 Wolfe MW, Edelman ER. Transient systolic dysfunction after relief of cardiac tamponade. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119 (01) 42-44
  • 16 Basmaji SG, Peretz-Larochelle M, Bernier ML. Pericardial decompression syndrome: a rare and potentially dramatic complication of pericardiocentesis. Int J Cardiol 2015; 178: 297-298
  • 17 Pulmonary edema after pericardiocentesis. N Engl J Med 1984; 310 (06) 391
  • 18 Manyari DE, Kostuk WJ, Purves P. Effect of pericardiocentesis on right and left ventricular function and volumes in pericardial effusion. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52 (01) 159-162
  • 19 Skalidis EI, Kochiadakis GE, Chrysostomakis SI, Igoumenidis NE, Manios EG, Vardas PE. Effect of pericardial pressure on human coronary circulation. Chest 2000; 117 (03) 910-912
  • 20 Ayoub C, Chang M, Kritharides L. A case report of ventricular dysfunction post pericardiocentesis: stress cardiomyopathy or pericardial decompression syndrome?. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2015; 13: 32
  • 21 Armstrong WF, Feigenbaum H, Dillon JC. Acute right ventricular dilation and echocardiographic volume overload following pericardiocentesis for relief of cardiac tamponade. Am Heart J 1984; 107 (06) 1266-1270
  • 22 Downey RJ, Bessler M, Weissman C. Acute pulmonary edema following pericardiocentesis for chronic cardiac tamponade secondary to trauma. Crit Care Med 1991; 19 (10) 1323-1325
  • 23 Hamaya Y, Dohi S, Ueda N, Akamatsu S. Severe circulatory collapse immediately after pericardiocentesis in a patient with chronic cardiac tamponade. Anesth Analg 1993; 77 (06) 1278-1281
  • 24 Braverman AC, Sundaresan S. Cardiac tamponade and severe ventricular dysfunction. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120 (05) 442
  • 25 Uemura S, Kagoshima T, Hashimoto T. et al. Acute left ventricular failure with pulmonary edema following pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade–a case report. Jpn Circ J 1995; 59 (01) 55-59
  • 26 Anguera I, Paré C, Perez-Villa F. Severe right ventricular dysfunction following pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade. Int J Cardiol 1997; 59 (02) 212-214
  • 27 Thrush DN. Biventricular failure after pericardial window. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998; 12 (06) 676-678
  • 28 Sunday R, Robinson LA, Bosek V. Low cardiac output complicating pericardiectomy for pericardial tamponade. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67 (01) 228-231
  • 29 Chamoun A, Cenz R, Mager A. et al. Acute left ventricular failure after large volume pericardiocentesis. Clin Cardiol 2003; 26 (12) 588-590
  • 30 Geffroy A, Beloeil H, Bouvier E, Chaumeil A, Albaladejo P, Marty J. Prolonged right ventricular failure after relief of cardiac tamponade. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51 (05) 482-485
  • 31 Ligero C, Leta R, Bayes-Genis A. Transient biventricular dysfunction following pericardiocentesis. Eur J Heart Fail 2006; 8 (01) 102-104
  • 32 Bernal JM, Pradhan J, Li T, Tchokonte R, Afonso L. Acute pulmonary edema following pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade. Can J Cardiol 2007; 23 (14) 1155-1156
  • 33 Ischaki E, Vasileiadis I, Koroneos A. et al. Acute heart failure following decompression of tuberculosis induced pericardial tamponade. Respir Med CME 2007; 1 (02) 87-89
  • 34 Sevimli S, Arslan S, Gündoğdu F, Senocak H. Development of left ventricular apical akinesis and thrombus during pericardiocentesis for pericardial tamponade. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2008; 36 (05) 338-341
  • 35 Sharaf M, Rajaram M, Mulji A. Intracardiac shunt with hypoxemia caused by right ventricular dysfunction following pericardiocentesis. Can J Cardiol 2008; 24 (09) e60-e62
  • 36 Khalili A. Acute heart failure after evacuation of large volume of pericardial effusion by pericardiostomy. Res J Biol Sci 2008; 3 (01) 32-34
  • 37 Karamichalis JM, Gursky A, Valaulikar G, Pate JW, Weiman DS. Acute pulmonary edema after pericardial drainage for cardiac tamponade. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88 (02) 675-677
  • 38 Moreno Flores V, Pascual Figal DA, Caro Martínez C, Valdés-Chávarri M. Transient left ventricular dysfunction following pericardiocentesis. An unusual complication to bear in mind. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009; 62 (09) 1071-1072
  • 39 Sunderji I, Kuhl M, Mathew T. Post pericardiocentesis low cardiac output syndrome in a patient with malignant thymoma. BMJ Case Rep 2009; 2009: bcr12.2008.1364
  • 40 Al Banna R, Husain A. Reversible severe biventricular dysfunction postpericardiocentesis for tuberculous pericardial tamponade. BMJ Case Rep 2011; 2011: bcr0220113837
  • 41 Lim AS, Paz-Pacheco E, Reyes M, Punzalan F. Pericardial decompression syndrome in a patient with hypothyroidism presenting as massive pericardial effusion: a case report and review of related literature. BMJ Case Rep 2011; 2011: bcr0420114117
  • 42 Abdelsalam M, Moritz TA, Snyder JA, Cheriyath P, Spizzieri CL. Paradoxical hemodynamic instability complicating pericardial window surgery for cardiac tamponade in a cancer patient. Tex Heart Inst J 2012; 39 (05) 711-713
  • 43 Philippakis G, Marinakis A, Manoloudakis N. Pericardial window procedures: implications on left ventricular function. Int J Surg Case Rep 2013; 4 (04) 403-405
  • 44 Weijers RW, Post JC. Transient left ventricular systolic dysfunction mimicking myocardial infarction after pericardiocentesis. Neth Heart J 2013; 21 (7-8): 364-366
  • 45 Liao BT, Lo SS. Paradoxical hemodynamic collapse after subxiphoid pericardial window. A A Case Rep 2015; 4 (06) 65-67
  • 46 Sng CYE, Koh CH, Lomarda AM, Tan SY. Transient acute left ventricular dysfunction post-pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade. J Cardiol Cases 2015; 12 (04) 133-137
  • 47 Versaci F, Donati R, Mezzanotte R, Chiariello L, Ammirati F. An unusual complication following pericardiocentesis: reversible left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2015; 16 (Suppl. 02) S133-S135
  • 48 Ivanac Vranesic I, Vrkic Kirhmajer M, Putarek K, Banfic L. A case report of asymptomatic transient biventricular dysfunction after pericardiocentesis: importance of echocardiographic follow-up. Cardiol Croat 2015; 10 (9–10): 214-214
  • 49 Albeyoglu S, Aldag M, Ciloglu U, Kutlu H, Dagsali S. Biventricular transient systolic dysfunction after mitral valve replacement: pericardial decompression syndrome. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016; 28: 145-148
  • 50 Fozing T, Zouri N, Adam O, Oezbek C. Management of a patient with pericardial decompression syndrome and HOCM. BMJ Case Rep 2016; 2016: bcr2015211550
  • 51 Han AJ, Slomka T, Mehrotra A, Murillo LC, Alsafwah SF, Khouzam RN. Paradoxical hemodynamic instability after pericardial window. Echocardiography 2016; 33 (08) 1251-1252
  • 52 Methachittiphan N. A case of recurrent hypotension after life-saving pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67 (13) 1052
  • 53 Takeuchi T, Fujimoto N, Dohi K. et al. Acute pulmonary edema with new giant V wave immediately after pericardiocentesis. Int J Cardiol 2016; 212: 253-254
  • 54 Said Ahmed T. Barrera Calix J, Woods L, Woredekal D. Pericardial decompression syndrome in a patient with low volume pericardial fluid removal. Chest 2017; 152 (04) A279
  • 55 Güler GB, Güler E, Günhan Demir G, Güneş HM. Pericardial decompression syndrome: an uncommon but dangerous complication after successful pericardiocentesis. Kosuyolu Heart Journal 2017; 20 (03) 253-255
  • 56 Klimis H, Altman M, Tan T, Natividad J, Abraham R, Thomas L. A case of persistent right ventricular failure after rapid decompression of a large chronic pericardial effusion. CASE (Phila) 2018; 2 (04) 142-146
  • 57 Malahfji M, Arain S. Reversed pulsus paradoxus in right ventricular failure. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J 2018; 14 (04) 298-300
  • 58 Mahajan A, Mahajan N, Suri A, Mahajan K. Pericardiocentesis decompression syndrome: an uncommon complication of a common procedure. IHJ Cardiovascular Case Reports 2019; 3 (01) 18-20
  • 59 (Abstr) Poosti K. Abstract 14178: Acute right ventricular failure following therapeutic ... Circulation. Published November 2019 . Accessed April 13, 2023 at: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.14178
  • 60 Hart E, Singh G, Leung K, Assad M. 167:Severe right heart dysfunction in the setting of pericardial decompression syndrome. Crit Care Med 2019; 47 (01) 65
  • 61 Cerrud-Rodriguez R, Algodi M, Alkhalil A. et al. An underrecognized and underreported post-procedural complication of a common cardiac procedure: an overlap presentation of the pericardial decompression syndrome and stress cardiomyopathy following a therapeutic pericardiocentesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75 (11) 2366
  • 62 Cusick A, Goyal A, Bhyan P, Chhabra L. Sudden paradoxical development of heart failure following pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade called as pericardial decompression syndrome (rare, underreported condition). J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75 (11) 2585
  • 63 Hutton A, Neupane P, Kaur N, Neupane A. A fatal case of pericardial decompression syndrome complicating a malignant pericardial effusion. B44 Critical Care Case Reports: Cardiovascular Diseases in the ICU II. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020;201:A3462
  • 64 Oh J, Kepreotis S, Ullah I, Rees D. 148 pericardial decompression syndrome - a case report of transient ventricular failure post-pericardiocentesis. Heart Lung Circ 2020; 29: S101
  • 65 Rao S, Alcantar D, Espinoza D, Lichtenberg R. Damned If You Drain, Damned If You Don't: a case of pericardial decompression syndrome. Cureus 2020; 12 (08) e9606
  • 66 Ricarte Bratti JP, Brunette V, Lebon JS, Pellerin M, Lamarche Y. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for severe pericardial decompression syndrome: a case report. Crit Care Med 2020; 48 (01) e74-e75
  • 67 Villanueva DLE, Regalado JJ, Uy-Agbayani C. A rare case of pericardial decompression syndrome in a Filipino female patient with suspected malignant pericardial effusion. J Med Cases 2020; 11 (04) 86-89
  • 68 Abaza K, Chen L, Thirunavukkarasu G, Rafii S. Uncommon presentation of a rare phenomenon. Pericardial decompression syndrome manifested with isolated acute right ventricular failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77 (18) 1955
  • 69 Adi O, Fong CP, Ahmad AH, Azil A, Ranga A, Panebianco N. Pericardial decompression syndrome: a complication of pericardiocentesis. Am J Emerg Med 2021; 45: 688.e3-688.e7
  • 70 Dhar P, Dimtri F, Yamamura D, Alexander T. How much is too much: asystole following pericardiocentesis due to pericardial decompression syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77 (18) 2343
  • 71 Perez SA, Amastha J, Vincent L, Alfonso CE, de Marchena E. Severe right ventricular failure following pericardiocentesis: a case report of pericardial decompression syndrome. JACC Case Rep 2021; 3 (01) 58-63
  • 72 Sargeant J, Whitman M, Salmon C. et al. A rare but serious consequence: a case of pericardial decompression syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77 (18) 2230
  • 73 Kapoor A, McWhorter Y, Polce DR. Acute right ventricular failure immediately following subxiphoid pericardial window requiring temporary cardiopulmonary bypass support: a case report of pericardial decompression syndrome. Cureus 2022; 14 (06) e26286
  • 74 Haji MS, Ovide G. Acute pulmonary edema after pericardiocentesis of malignant effusion despite usage of a pericardial drain catheter. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79 (09) 2940