Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15(02): 335-341
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786682
Research Article

Resident-Driven Clinical Decision Support Governance to Improve the Utility of Clinical Decision Support

Kristin N. Sheehan
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
,
Anthony L. Cioci
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
,
Tomas M. Lucioni
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
,
Sean M. Hernandez
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives This resident-driven quality improvement project aimed to better understand the known problem of a misaligned clinical decision support (CDS) strategy and improve CDS utilization.

Methods An internal survey was sent to all internal medicine (IM) residents to identify the most bothersome CDS alerts. Survey results were supported by electronic health record (EHR) data of CDS firing rates and response rates which were collected for each of the three most bothersome CDS tools. Changes to firing criteria were created to increase utilization and to better align with the five rights of CDS. Findings and proposed changes were presented to our institution's CDS Governance Committee. Changes were approved and implemented. Postintervention firing rates were then collected for 1 week.

Results Twenty nine residents participated in the CDS survey and identified sepsis alerts, lipid profile reminders, and telemetry renewals to be the most bothersome alerts. EHR data showed action rates for these CDS as low as 1%. We implemented changes to focus emergency department (ED)-based sepsis alerts to the right provider, better address the right information for lipid profile reminders, and select the right time in workflow for telemetry renewals to be most effective. With these changes we successfully eliminated ED-based sepsis CDS reminders for IM providers, saw a 97% reduction in firing rates for the lipid profile CDS, and noted a 55% reduction in firing rates for telemetry CDS.

Conclusion This project highlighted that alert improvements spearheaded by resident teams can be completed successfully using robust CDS governance strategies and can effectively optimize interruptive alerts.

Keywords

quality improvement - electronic health records - clinical decision support - alert fatigue

Ethical Approval

The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was reviewed by AHWFBMC Institutional Review Board.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 16 October 2023

Accepted: 12 March 2024

Article published online:
01 May 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Fry C. Development and evaluation of best practice alerts: methods to optimize care quality and clinician communication. AACN Adv Crit Care 2021; 32 (04) 468-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Baird A, Kibbe B, Lesandrini J. Stakeholder bias in best practice advisories: an ethical perspective. JAMIA Open 2020; 3 (02) 142-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Backman R, Bayliss S, Moore D, Litchfield I. Clinical reminder alert fatigue in healthcare: a systematic literature review protocol using qualitative evidence. Syst Rev 2017; 6 (01) 255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 McDonald CJ. Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man. N Engl J Med 1976; 295 (24) 1351-1355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 van der Sijs H, Aarts J, Vulto A, Berg M. Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (02) 138-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Greene RA, Zullo AR, Mailloux CM, Berard-Collins C, Levy MM, Amass T. Effect of best practice advisories on sedation protocol compliance and drug-related hazardous condition mitigation among critical care patients. Crit Care Med 2020; 48 (02) 185-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Presti Jr J, Alexeeff S, Horton B, Prausnitz S, Avins AL. Changing provider PSA screening behavior using best practice advisories: interventional study in a multispecialty group practice. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35 (Suppl. 02) 796-801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Chanas T, Volles D, Sawyer R, Mallow-Corbett S. Analysis of a new best-practice advisory on time to initiation of antibiotics in surgical intensive care unit patients with septic shock. J Intensive Care Soc 2019; 20 (01) 34-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R. et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157 (01) 29-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Schedlbauer A, Prasad V, Mulvaney C. et al. What evidence supports the use of computerized alerts and prompts to improve clinicians' prescribing behavior?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (04) 531-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bedoya AD, Clement ME, Phelan M, Steorts RC, O'Brien C, Goldstein BA. Minimal impact of implemented early warning score and best practice alert for patient deterioration. Crit Care Med 2019; 47 (01) 49-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Murad DA, Tsugawa Y, Elashoff DA, Baldwin KM, Bell DS. Distinct components of alert fatigue in physicians' responses to a noninterruptive clinical decision support alert. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 30 (01) 64-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jankovic I, Chen JH. Clinical decision support and implications for the clinician burnout crisis. Yearb Med Inform 2020; 29 (01) 145-154
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Li C, Parpia C, Sriharan A, Keefe DT. Electronic medical record-related burnout in healthcare providers: a scoping review of outcomes and interventions. BMJ Open 2022; 12 (08) e060865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chaparro JD, Beus JM, Dziorny AC. et al. Clinical decision support stewardship: best practices and techniques to monitor and improve interruptive alerts. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (03) 560-568
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Tajirian T, Stergiopoulos V, Strudwick G. et al. The influence of electronic health record use on physician burnout: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (07) e19274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tai-Seale M, Baxter S, Millen M. et al. Association of physician burnout with perceived EHR work stress and potentially actionable factors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30 (10) 1665-1672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bryant AD, Fletcher GS, Payne TH. Drug interaction alert override rates in the Meaningful Use era: no evidence of progress. Appl Clin Inform 2014; 5 (03) 802-813
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ancker JS, Edwards A, Nosal S, Hauser D, Mauer E, Kaushal R. with the HITEC Investigators. Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17 (01) 36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sirajuddin AM, Osheroff JA, Sittig DF, Chuo J, Velasco F, Collins DA. Implementation pearls from a new guidebook on improving medication use and outcomes with clinical decision support. Effective CDS is essential for addressing healthcare performance improvement imperatives. J Healthc Inf Manag 2009; 23 (04) 38-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kwan JL, Lo L, Ferguson J. et al. Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2020; 370: m3216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Embi PJ, Leonard AC. Evaluating alert fatigue over time to EHR-based clinical trial alerts: findings from a randomized controlled study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 (e1): e145-e148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hussain MI, Reynolds TL, Zheng K. Medication safety alert fatigue may be reduced via interaction design and clinical role tailoring: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (10) 1141-1149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG. et al. 2014 AHA/ACG guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary. Circulation 2014; 130 (25) 2354-2394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 McCoy AB, Russo EM, Johnson KB. et al. Clinician collaboration to improve clinical decision support: the Clickbusters initiative. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29 (06) 1050-1059
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kawamanto K, Flynn MC, Kukhareva P. et al. A pragmatic guide to establishing clinical decision support governance and addressing decision support fatigue: a case study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2018; 2018: 624-633
    PubMedGoogle Scholar