Clin Colon Rectal Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787893
Review Article

The Old: Is There Any Role for Screening Colonoscopy after the Age of 75? The Surgeon's Perspective

Imran Khan
1   Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Mikhael Belkovsky
1   Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Emre Gorgun
1   Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Guidelines recommend individualized decision making for screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients after the age of 75 years due to low additional benefits. That should be taken with a grain of salt, as these recommendations are based on expert opinion and simulation models which do not consider (1) the differences in pathogenesis and cancer biology of CRC in elderly; (2) the risks of colonoscopy in this patient population; (3) and the impact of new surgical and nonsurgical therapies for CRC. In this review, our goal is to bring a surgeon's perspective to understand the role of screening colonoscopy in patients older than 75 years.

Author's Contributions

E.M. developed the study concept, while I.M. was responsible for the study design and literature research. Manuscript preparation was carried out by I.M. and M.B., with E.M. conducting the manuscript review.




Publication History

Article published online:
27 June 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73 (01) 17-48
  • 2 Calderwood AH, Holub JL, Greenwald DA, Robertson DJ. Yield and practice patterns of surveillance colonoscopy among older adults: an analysis of the GI Quality Improvement Consortium. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114 (11) 1811-1819
  • 3 SEER*Explorer: An Interactive Website for SEER Cancer Statistics [Internet]. Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute; April 19, 2023. Accessed June 5, 2024 at: Https://Seer.Cancer.Gov/Statistics-Network/Explorer/
  • 4 Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc. 2022. Cancer Facts & Figures 2023;84. Accessed June 17, 2024 at: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2023/2023-cancer-facts-and-figures.pdf
  • 5 Bouvard V, Loomis D, Guyton KZ. et al; International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (16) 1599-1600
  • 6 Wild C, Weiderpass E, Stewart B. World Cancer Report: Cancer Research for Cancer Prevention. 2020 . Accessed June 17, 2024 at: https://publications.iarc.fr/586
  • 7 Botteri E, Borroni E, Sloan EK. et al. Smoking and colorectal cancer risk, overall and by molecular subtypes: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115 (12) 1940-1949
  • 8 Yuhara H, Steinmaus C, Cohen SE, Corley DA, Tei Y, Buffler PA. Is diabetes mellitus an independent risk factor for colon cancer and rectal cancer?. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106 (11) 1911-1921 , quiz 1922
  • 9 GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 2023; 402 (10397): 203-234
  • 10 Mundade R, Imperiale TF, Prabhu L, Loehrer PJ, Lu T. Genetic pathways, prevention, and treatment of sporadic colorectal cancer. Oncoscience 2014; 1 (06) 400-406
  • 11 Bogaert J, Prenen H. Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol 2014; 27 (01) 9-14
  • 12 Kotake K, Asano M, Ozawa H, Kobayashi H, Sugihara K. Tumour characteristics, treatment patterns and survival of patients aged 80 years or older with colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17 (03) 205-215
  • 13 Van Herck Y, Feyaerts A, Alibhai S. et al. Is cancer biology different in older patients?. Lancet Healthy Longev 2021; 2 (10) e663-e677
  • 14 Phipps AI, Buchanan DD, Makar KW. et al. BRAF mutation status and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis according to patient and tumor characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012; 21 (10) 1792-1798
  • 15 Sorbye H, Dragomir A, Sundström M. et al. High BRAF mutation frequency and marked survival differences in subgroups according to KRAS/BRAF mutation status and tumor tissue availability in a prospective population-based metastatic colorectal cancer cohort. PLoS One 2015; 10 (06) e0131046
  • 16 Yang L, Xiong Z, He W. et al. Proximal shift of colorectal cancer with increasing age in different ethnicities. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10: 2663-2673
  • 17 Kuipers EJ, Grady WM, Lieberman D. et al. Colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2015; 1: 15065
  • 18 Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA. et al. Colorectal cancer screening: recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112 (07) 1016-1030
  • 19 Patel SG, May FP, Anderson JC. et al. Updates on age to start and stop colorectal cancer screening: recommendations from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117 (01) 57-69
  • 20 Cenin DR, Tinmouth J, Naber SK. et al. Calculation of stop ages for colorectal cancer screening based on comorbidities and screening history. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19 (03) 547-555
  • 21 Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM. et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2021; 325 (19) 1965-1977
  • 22 Knudsen AB, Rutter CM, Peterse EFP. et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD:: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;; 2021
  • 23 Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Løberg M. et al; Nordic-European Initiative on Colorectal Cancer (NordICC) Study Group. Population-based colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176 (07) 894-902
  • 24 Quintero E, Castells A, Bujanda L. et al; COLONPREV Study Investigators. Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (08) 697-706
  • 25 Kann BR, Margolin DA, Brill SA. et al. The importance of colonoscopy in colorectal surgeons' practices: results of a survey. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49 (11) 1763-1767
  • 26 Lin JS, Perdue LA, Henrikson NB, Bean SI, Blasi PR. Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2021; 325 (19) 1978-1998
  • 27 Reumkens A, Rondagh EJ, Bakker MC, Winkens B, Masclee AA, Sanduleanu S. Post-colonoscopy complications: a systematic review, time trends, and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Off J Am Coll Gastroenterol ACG 2016; 111 (08) 1092-1101
  • 28 Screening for Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]. Rockville, MD:: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US);; 2021
  • 29 Causada-Calo N, Bishay K, Albashir S, Al Mazroui A, Armstrong D. Association between age and complications after outpatient colonoscopy. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (06) e208958
  • 30 García-Albéniz X, Hsu J, Bretthauer M, Hernán MA. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy to prevent colorectal cancer among Medicare beneficiaries aged 70 to 79 years: a prospective observational study. Ann Intern Med 2017; 166 (01) 18-26
  • 31 Kothari ST, Huang RJ, Shaukat A. et al; ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Chair. ASGE review of adverse events in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90 (06) 863-876.e33
  • 32 Karajeh MA, Sanders DS, Hurlstone DP. Colonoscopy in elderly people is a safe procedure with a high diagnostic yield: a prospective comparative study of 2000 patients. Endoscopy 2006; 38 (03) 226-230
  • 33 Lukens FJ, Loeb DS, Machicao VI, Achem SR, Picco MF. Colonoscopy in octogenarians: a prospective outpatient study. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97 (07) 1722-1725
  • 34 Day LW, Kwon A, Inadomi JM, Walter LC, Somsouk M. Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74 (04) 885-896
  • 35 Adamcewicz M, Bearelly D, Porat G, Friedenberg FK. Mechanism of action and toxicities of purgatives used for colonoscopy preparation. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2011; 7 (01) 89-101
  • 36 Ho SB, Hovsepians R, Gupta S. Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy in the elderly patient. Drugs Aging 2017; 34 (03) 163-172
  • 37 Nee J, Chippendale RZ, Feuerstein JD. Screening for colon cancer in older adults: risks, benefits, and when to stop. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95 (01) 184-196
  • 38 Martel M, Barkun AN, Menard C, Restellini S, Kherad O, Vanasse A. Split-dose preparations are superior to day-before bowel cleansing regimens: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2015; 149 (01) 79-88
  • 39 Enestvedt BK, Tofani C, Laine LA, Tierney A, Fennerty MB. 4-Liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10 (11) 1225-1231
  • 40 Long MD, Sands BE. When do you start and when do you stop screening for colon cancer in inflammatory bowel disease?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16 (05) 621-623
  • 41 Mukewar S, Costedio M, Wu X. et al. Severe adverse outcomes of endoscopic perforations in patients with and without IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014; 20 (11) 2056-2066
  • 42 Jonathan V, David MA, Lauren M. Demographic Turning Points for the United States: Population Projections for 2020 to 2060. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. 2020 . Accessed June 17, 2024 at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2020/demo/p25-1144.pdf
  • 43 Al-Refaie WB, Parsons HM, Habermann EB. et al. Operative outcomes beyond 30-day mortality: colorectal cancer surgery in oldest old. Ann Surg 2011; 253 (05) 947-952
  • 44 Ketelaers SHJ, Orsini RG, Burger JWA, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Rutten HJT. Significant improvement in postoperative and 1-year mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in recent years. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45 (11) 2052-2058
  • 45 Ogata T, Yoshida N, Sadakari Y. et al. Colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients 80 years and older: a comparison with younger age groups. J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 13 (01) 137-148
  • 46 Virk GS, Jafri M, Mehdi S, Ashley C. Staging and survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) in octogenarians: nationwide study of US Veterans. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10 (01) 12-18
  • 47 Roscio F, Boni L, Clerici F, Frattini P, Cassinotti E, Scandroglio I. Is laparoscopic surgery really effective for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer in very elderly over 80 years old? A prospective multicentric case-control assessment. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (10) 4372-4382
  • 48 Tokuoka M, Ide Y, Takeda M. et al. Single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients. Oncol Lett 2016; 12 (02) 1465-1470
  • 49 Kristjansson SR, Nesbakken A, Jordhøy MS. et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment can predict complications in elderly patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2010; 76 (03) 208-217
  • 50 van Leeuwen BL, Kristjansson SR, Audisio RA. Should specialized oncogeriatric surgeons operate older unfit cancer patients?. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010; 36 (Suppl. 01) S18-S22
  • 51 Papamichael D, Audisio RA, Glimelius B. et al. Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) consensus recommendations 2013. Ann Oncol 2015; 26 (03) 463-476
  • 52 Tan KY, Tan P, Tan L. A collaborative transdisciplinary “geriatric surgery service” ensures consistent successful outcomes in elderly colorectal surgery patients. World J Surg 2011; 35 (07) 1608-1614
  • 53 Wang Z, Tan KY, Tan P. Functional outcomes in elderly adults who have undergone major colorectal surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013; 61 (12) 2249-2250
  • 54 Montroni I, Ugolini G, Saur NM. et al; SIOG Surgical Task Force/ESSO GOSAFE Study Group. Predicting functional recovery and quality of life in older patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: real-world data from the International GOSAFE Study. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41 (34) 5247-5262
  • 55 Millan M. Enhanced recovery after surgery in elderly and high-risk patients. 2020. 2020 ;5. Accessed June 5, 2024 at: https://ales.amegroups.org/article/view/5712
  • 56 Millan M, Renau-Escrig AI. Minimizing the impact of colorectal surgery in the older patient: the role of enhanced recovery programs in older patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46 (03) 338-343
  • 57 Slieker J, Frauche P, Jurt J. et al. Enhanced recovery ERAS for elderly: a safe and beneficial pathway in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32 (02) 215-221
  • 58 Hannan E, Feeney G, Fahad Ullah M, Condon E, Coffey JC, Peirce C. Robotic colorectal surgery in elderly patients: a single-centre experience. Int J Med Robot 2022; 18 (05) e2431
  • 59 Menegozzo CAM, Teixeira-Júnior F, Couto-Netto SDD, Martins-Júnior O, Bernini CO, Utiyama EM. Outcomes of elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery for complicated colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Clinics (São Paulo) 2019; 74: e1074
  • 60 Pacilli M, Fersini A, Pavone G, Cianci P, Ambrosi A, Tartaglia N. Emergency surgery for colon diseases in elderly patients-analysis of complications, and postoperative course. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022; 58 (08) 1062
  • 61 Ascanelli S, Navarra G, Tonini G. et al. Early and late outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer: elective versus emergency surgery. Tumori 2003; 89 (01) 36-41
  • 62 Tobaruela E, Camuñas J, Enríquez-Navascúes JM. et al. Medical factors in the morbidity and mortality associated with emergency colorectal cancer surgery. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 1997; 89 (01) 13-22
  • 63 Smothers L, Hynan L, Fleming J, Turnage R, Simmang C, Anthony T. Emergency surgery for colon carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46 (01) 24-30
  • 64 Webster PJ, Tavangar Ranjbar N, Turner J, El-Sharkawi A, Zhou G, Chitsabesan P. Outcomes following emergency colorectal cancer presentation in the elderly. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22 (12) 1924-1932
  • 65 Ogola GO, Shafi S. Cost of specific emergency general surgery diseases and factors associated with high-cost patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016; 80 (02) 265-271
  • 66 Golder AM, McMillan DC, Horgan PG, Roxburgh CSD. Determinants of emergency presentation in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 4366
  • 67 Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W. et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (04) 711-717 , discussion 717–718
  • 68 Garcia-Aguilar J, Patil S, Gollub MJ. et al. Organ preservation in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with total neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40 (23) 2546-2556
  • 69 Aref A, Abdalla A. Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: induction or consolidation chemotherapy?. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40 (23) 2515-2519
  • 70 Papke Jr DJ, Yurgelun MB, Noffsinger AE, Turner KO, Genta RM, Redston M. Prevalence of mismatch-repair deficiency in rectal adenocarcinomas. N Engl J Med 2022; 387 (18) 1714-1716
  • 71 Cercek A, Lumish M, Sinopoli J. et al. PD-1 blockade in mismatch repair-deficient, locally advanced rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2022; 386 (25) 2363-2376
  • 72 Chalabi M, Verschoor YL, Van den Berg J. et al. LBA7 neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition in locally advanced MMR-deficient colon cancer: the NICHE-2 study. Ann Oncol 2022; 33: S1389
  • 73 Verschoor YL, van den Berg J, Beets G. et al. Neoadjuvant Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, and Celecoxib in MMR-Proficient and MMR-Deficient Colon Cancers: Final Clinical Analysis of the NICHE Study. American Society of Clinical Oncology;; 2022
  • 74 Han K, Tang J-H, Liao L-E. et al. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition improves organ preservation in T4bM0 colorectal cancer with mismatch repair deficiency: a retrospective observational study. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66 (10) e996-e1005
  • 75 Keihanian T, Othman MO. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: an update on best practice. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2021; 14: 317-330
  • 76 Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2015; 47 (09) 829-854
  • 77 Draganov PV, Wang AY, Othman MO, Fukami N. AGA institute clinical practice update: endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17 (01) 16-25.e1
  • 78 Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y. et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2015; 27 (04) 417-434
  • 79 Takahashi Y, Mizuno KI, Takahashi K. et al. Long-term outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32 (04) 567-573
  • 80 Nishimura T, Oka S, Tanaka S. et al. Long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged over 80 years. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21 (01) 324
  • 81 Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC. et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91 (03) 463-485.e5
  • 82 Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR. et al. Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68 (04) 250-281
  • 83 Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations on screening for colorectal cancer in primary care. CMAJ 2016; 188 (05) 340-348