Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788636
Original Article

The Evolution of Skull Base Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis Spanning Nearly 125 Years

David B. Kurland 
1   Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York, United States
,
Akshay Save
1   Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York, United States
,
Aneek Patel 
1   Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York, United States
,
Karenna J. Groff 
1   Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York, United States
,
Carl H. Snyderman 
2   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Donato Pacione
1   Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York, United States
,
John G. Golfinos 
1   Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York, United States
,
Chandranath Sen
1   Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Skull base surgery has evolved from fundamental elements into a distinct multidisciplinary specialty. Using bibliometrics, we appraised the literature pertaining to skull base surgery since 1900 and studied the emergence of the specialty as a scholarly field.

Methods We queried Web of Science for all content from past presidents of the North American Skull Base Society (N = 31) and their self-identified forebears, influences, contemporaries, and trainees (N = 115). Statistical and bibliometric analyses were performed using various Python packages on article metadata.

Results Our query returned 28,167 articles. The most pertinent works (N = 15,529), identified algorithmically through an analysis of terms in titles, were published between 1900 and 2024 by 15,286 authors. The field exploded in the latter half of the 20th century, concurrently with increased interdisciplinary and international collaboration, and contemporaneously with the formation of centers of excellence and influential societies. Since 1950, prolific contributors to the field from neurosurgery, otolaryngology, radiology/radiation oncology, plastic surgery, and ophthalmology have increasingly subspecialized in skull base topics. The proportion of female authors in the corpus has grown from <1% in 1980 to 17% in 2023. We identify the articles that comprise the historical roots of modern skull base surgery, map the emergence of fundamental terminology within the corpus, and identify the authors who stand as key nodes of collaboration and influence.

Conclusion The field of skull base surgery was born from pioneering individuals with training in varied disciplines. The coalescence of skull base surgery into a distinct and diversified subspecialty has been powered by dedicated collaborative efforts on a global scale.

Keywords

skull base - cranial base surgery - bibliometrics - trends - publications

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 16 May 2024

Accepted: 03 July 2024

Article published online:
22 July 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Goodrich JT. A millennium review of skull base surgery. Childs Nerv Syst 2000; 16 (10–11): 669-685
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Phan K, Mobbs RJ. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist. J Spine Surg 2015; 1 (01) 19-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sathish M, Eswar R. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in spine surgery-how good are they in methodological quality? A systematic review. Global Spine J 2021; 11 (03) 378-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Briner RB, Denyer D. Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kurland DB, Cheung ATM, Kim NC. et al. A century of evolution in spine surgery publications: a bibliometric analysis of the field from 1900 to 2023. Neurosurgery 2023; 93 (05) 1121-1143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 2017; 11 (04) 959-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kurland DB, Lau D, Kim NC, Ames C. A bibliometric analysis of patient-reported outcome measures in adult spinal deformity, and the future of patient-centric outcome assessments in the era of predictive analytics. Semin Spine Surg 2023; 35 (02) 101032
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Yang SD, Seu M, Qiao JB, Tsiang JTH, Pecoraro N, Germanwala AV. Posters presented at North American Skull Base Society 2016-2018: what factors influence their publication?. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 84 (06) 531-537
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ajlan A, Basindwah S, Yaghmoor W. et al. The 100 most cited articles in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: a bibliometric analysis. World Neurosurg 2023; 171: e363-e381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Zhang M, Singh H, Almodovar-Mercado GJ, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Required reading: the most impactful articles in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 2016; 92: 499-512.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Patel A, Abdelsalam A, Shariff RK. et al. Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited articles on stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial meningiomas. Br J Neurosurg 2023; 37 (05) 1088-1093
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Behmer Hansen RT, Palma SD, Blocher Iii WA. et al. A decade of global skull base researchers: authorship trends from 3,295 abstracts in the Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base . J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2023; 85 (01) 44-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Xiao Y, Yu W, Zheng J. et al. Bibliometric insights in advances of chordoma: global trends and research development in the last decade. Orthop Surg 2023; 15 (10) 2505-2514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chang C, Tang K, Gao Y, Dai J, Dai C. Bibliometric analysis of the global research trends and hotspots in chordoma from 2000 to 2020. PLoS One 2022; 17 (12) e0279181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gao J, Huang R, Yin H, Song D, Meng T. Research hotspots and trends of chordoma: a bibliometric analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 946597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Doglietto F, Prevedello DM, Jane Jr JA, Han J, Laws Jr ER. Brief history of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery–from Philipp Bozzini to the First World Congress of Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (06) E3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Malis LI. Base of skull: history and philosophy. Skull Base Surg 1992; 2 (02) 69-75
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Maroon JC. Skull base surgery: past, present, and future trends. Neurosurg Focus. Published online 2005. Accessed 8 July 2024 at: https://scholar.archive.org/work/afnqx6cvmfb2lgl3mf2zuxh2im/access/wayback/https://thejns.org/downloadpdf/journals/neurosurg-focus/19/1/foc.2005.19.1.2.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Husain Q, Patel SK, Soni RS, Patel AA, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Celebrating the golden anniversary of anterior skull base surgery: reflections on the past 50 years and its historical evolution. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (01) 64-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Francis HW, Papel I, Lina I. et al. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at Johns Hopkins: the first 100 years (1914-2014). Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (09, Suppl 9): S1-S35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Donald PJ. History of skull base surgery. Skull Base Surg 1991; 1 (01) 1-3
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cote DJ, Wiemann R, Smith TR, Dunn IF, Al-Mefty O, Laws ER. The expanding spectrum of disease treated by the transnasal, transsphenoidal microscopic and endoscopic anterior skull base approach: a single-center experience 2008-2015. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (04) 899-905
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Priola SM, Raffa G, Abbritti RV. et al. The pioneering contribution of italian surgeons to skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (3–4): 523-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Prevedello DM, Doglietto F, Jane Jr JA, Jagannathan J, Han J, Laws Jr ER. History of endoscopic skull base surgery: its evolution and current reality. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (01) 206-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Parikh KA, Khan N, Sorenson JM, Gienapp AJ, Robertson JH, Michael II LM. The development of skull base surgery as a discipline: remembrances of Dr Jon H. Robertson. Neurosurgery 2024; (e-pub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002830.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sekhar LN, Juric-Sekhar G, Qazi Z. et al. The future of skull base surgery: a view through tinted glasses. World Neurosurg 2020; 142: 29-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pangal DJ, Cote DJ, Ruzevick J. et al. Robotic and robot-assisted skull base neurosurgery: systematic review of current applications and future directions. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 52 (01) E15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 North American Skull Base Society (NASBS). Accessed 31 January 2024 at: https://www.nasbs.org/about/
    PubMed
  • 29 A Winning Team: William F. House, MD, and William E. Hitselberger, MD. Accessed 2 February 2024 at: https://bulletin.entnet.org/home/article/21246213/a-winning-team-william-f-house-md-and-william-e-hitselberger-md-online-exclusive
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102 (46) 16569-16572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 2006; 69 (01) 131-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Xu RF, Varady NH, Chen AF. Trends in gender disparities in authorship of arthroplasty research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102 (23) e131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sing DC, Jain D, Ouyang D. Gender trends in authorship of spine-related academic literature-a 39-year perspective. Spine J 2017; 17 (11) 1749-1754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Zadeh Lab, University of Toronto. Accessed 18 February 2024 at: https://www.zadehlab.com/
    PubMed
  • 35 North American Skull Base Society. NASBS Board of Directors. Accessed 22 February 2024 at: https://www.nasbs.org/nasbs-board-of-directors/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 University of Michigan Health. Faculty profile. Accessed 22 February 2024 at: https://www.uofmhealth.org/profile/465/erin-lynn-mckean-md
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Skull Base Study Group. International Congress. Traumatology of the Skull Base: Anatomy, Clinical and Radiological Diagnosis, Operative Treatment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Abbasi A, Hossain L, Leydesdorff L. Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. J Informetr 2012; 6 (03) 403-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Todeschini R, Baccini A. Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators: Quantitative Tools for Studying and Evaluating Research. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2016
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Uddin S, Hossain L, Rasmussen K. Network effects on scientific collaborations. PLoS One 2013; 8 (02) e57546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Fujita M, Ishido K, Inoue H, Terano T. Evaluating Researchers through Betweenness Centrality Measures of Co-Author Networks from Academic Literature Database : Finding Gatekeeper Researchers in Organizational Research. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Seattle, Washington, United States. IEEE; 2018: 4313-4320
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Johnson PG, Echanique KA, Chitguppi C, Lee JT, Toskala E. Gender gap among rhinology and skull base surgeons. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2022; 12 (10) 1303-1306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Behmer Hansen RT, Behmer Hansen RA, Gold JL. et al. A decade of global skull base researchers: gender data from over 2,700 abstract authors in the Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base . J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 85 (01) 57-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 WORLDSymposium™ 2024 program. Mol Genet Metab 2024; 141 (02) 108106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 2023 Annual Meeting. NASBS. Published October 27, 2022. Accessed 29 February 2024. https://www.nasbs.org/2023meeting/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Hafner L, Peifer TP, Hafner FS. Equal accuracy for Andrew and Abubakar-detecting and mitigating bias in name-ethnicity classification algorithms. AI Soc 2023; (e-pub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1007/s00146-022-01619-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar