J Wrist Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788643
Scientific Article

Capitolunate versus Four-Corner Arthrodesis for Midcarpal Arthrosis

1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Temple University Hospital – Boyer Pavilion, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Alexis Kasper
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Matthew Sherman
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Daniel Fletcher
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Pedro Beredjiklian
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Rick Tosti
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Midcarpal fusion is a procedure indicated for midcarpal arthrosis or instability, though the merits of fusing the triquetrohamate joint in addition to the capitolunate joint are not known. The purpose of this study was to compare capitolunate fusion with four-corner fusion with a null hypothesis that no differences would exist in outcomes.

Methods A retrospective chart review of patients with midcarpal arthrosis who underwent midcarpal fusion between the years 2013 and 2023 was conducted. Patients were separated into groups according to fusion type. Demographics and methods of fixation were recorded. Outcomes evaluated included subjective outcomes, radiographic alignment, success of fusion, range of motion, strength, and complications.

Results In total, 51 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 20 had capitolunate fusions and 31 had four-corner fusions. Staples were the most common form of fixation. Postoperative strength and range of motion were relatively preserved from preoperative levels in both groups. Both groups also had similar improvements in Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Capitolunate angles were not significantly different between groups; however, ulnar translocation was greater in the four-corner fusion group. Revision surgery was required in 10% of capitolunate fusions versus 29% of four-corner fusions, although this difference was not calculated to be significantly different.

Conclusion Capitolunate fusion and four-corner fusion yielded comparable improvements with respect to clinical and radiographic outcomes. Fusing the triquetrohamate joint does not appear to enhance outcomes.



Publication History

Received: 03 May 2024

Accepted: 25 June 2024

Article published online:
29 July 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Strauch RJ. Scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse arthritis–update on evaluation and treatment. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (04) 729-735
  • 2 Shah CM, Stern PJ. Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrist arthritis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2013; 6 (01) 9-17
  • 3 Calandruccio JH, Gelberman RH, Duncan SF, Goldfarb CA, Pae R, Gramig W. Capitolunate arthrodesis with scaphoid and triquetrum excision. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25 (05) 824-832
  • 4 Chamay A, Della Santa D, Vilaseca A. Radiolunate arthrodesis. Factor of stability for the rheumatoid wrist. Ann Chir Main 1983; 2 (01) 5-17
  • 5 Graner O, Lopes EI, Carvalho BC, Atlas S. Arthrodesis of the carpal bones in the treatment of Kienböck's disease, painful ununited fractures of the navicular and lunate bones with avascular necrosis, and old fracture-dislocations of carpal bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1966; 48 (04) 767-774
  • 6 Peterson HA, Lipscomb PR. Intercarpal arthrodesis. Arch Surg 1967; 95 (01) 127-134
  • 7 Pisano SM, Peimer CA, Wheeler DR, Sherwin F. Scaphocapitate intercarpal arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16 (02) 328-333
  • 8 Kirschenbaum D, Schneider LH, Kirkpatrick WH, Adams DC, Cody RP. Scaphoid excision and capitolunate arthrodesis for radioscaphoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18 (05) 780-785
  • 9 Krakauer JD, Bishop AT, Cooney WP. Surgical treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19 (05) 751-759
  • 10 Goldfarb CA, Yin Y, Gilula LA, Fisher AJ, Boyer MI. Wrist fractures: what the clinician wants to know. Radiology 2001; 219 (01) 11-28
  • 11 DiBenedetto MR, Lubbers LM, Coleman CR. A standardized measurement of ulnar carpal translocation. J Hand Surg Am 1990; 15 (06) 1009-1010
  • 12 Vender MI, Watson HK, Wiener BD, Black DM. Degenerative change in symptomatic scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am 1987; 12 (04) 514-519
  • 13 Gaston RG, Greenberg JA, Baltera RM, Mih A, Hastings H. Clinical outcomes of scaphoid and triquetral excision with capitolunate arthrodesis versus scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (08) 1407-1412
  • 14 Duraku LS, Hundepool CA, Hoogendam L. et al; Hand-Wrist Study Group. Two-corner fusion or four-corner fusion of the wrist for midcarpal osteoarthritis? A multicenter prospective comparative cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (06) 1130e-1139e
  • 15 Goubier J-N, Teboul F. Capitolunate arthrodesis with compression screws. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2007; 11 (01) 24-28
  • 16 Dunn JC, Polmear MM, Scanaliato JP, Orr JD, Nesti LJ. Capitolunate arthrodesis: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45 (04) 365.e1-365.e10