Digestive Disease Interventions 2025; 09(01): 053-058
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1789258
Review Article

Telementoring in Endoscopy and Surgery

1   Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Telementoring is the remote guidance of a mentee by an expert mentor specialist through a procedure or surgery. Advances in technology and telecommunications have enabled live interactions connecting people across the world over the same surgical operating field. While galvanized by COVID-era restrictions on travel and increasing reliance on virtual interfaces, there are also many other drivers for interest in this modality. Rural, isolated, or underserved locations stand to gain from prompt access to specialists, and there is potential for this technology to be resource-efficient and cost-effective. This review describes some of the telementoring forays in the fields of endoscopy, laparoscopy, and robotic surgery. This is a rapidly evolving field as it is highly technology dependent. Some challenges lie ahead before it can enjoy broader adoption, but telementoring shows promise as an approach that can help address unmet needs in unique clinical settings.



Publication History

Received: 22 July 2024

Accepted: 30 July 2024

Article published online:
25 November 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Evaluating Clinical Applications of Telemedicine. Field MJ. Introduction and background. In: Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications in Health Care. National Academies Press (US); 1996. Accessed July 5, 2024 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45440/
  • 2 Huang EY, Knight S, Guetter CR. et al. Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: a narrative review. Am J Surg 2019; 218 (04) 760-766
  • 3 Eaton LH, Godfrey DS, Langford DJ, Rue T, Tauben DJ, Doorenbos AZ. Telementoring for improving primary care provider knowledge and competence in managing chronic pain: a randomised controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 2020; 26 (1-2): 21-27
  • 4 Hintz G, Haines V, Dawe P. Rural trauma telementoring: a pilot project. Can J Surg 2022; 65 (05) E567-E572
  • 5 Teleproctoring - A SAGES Wiki Article. SAGES. Published December 6, 2013. Accessed July 8, 2024 at: https://www.sages.org/wiki/teleproctoring/
  • 6 Collins J. Guidance for the safe implementation of telementoring in robotic surgery. In: Principles and Practice of Robotic Surgery. Elsevier; 2024: 69-76
  • 7 Artsen AMS, , S Burkett L, Duvvuri U, Bonidie M. Surgeon satisfaction and outcomes of tele-proctoring for robotic gynecologic surgery. J Robot Surg 2022; 16 (03) 563-568
  • 8 Rosser JC, Wood M, Payne JH. et al. Telementoring. A practical option in surgical training. Surg Endosc 1997; 11 (08) 852-855
  • 9 SAGES. SAGES Project 6 Telementoring Initiative. SAGES. Accessed July 8, 2024 at: https://www.sages.org/meetings/project6/
  • 10 Elrod J, Boettcher J, Vincent D. et al. Telementoring of open and laparoscopic knot tying and suturing is possible: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2022; 32 (05) 443-451
  • 11 Danys D, Marcinkeviciute K, Cereska V, Miknevicius P, Poskus T, Osorio J. Telementoring experience for complex bariatric operation-laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Obes Surg 2024; 34 (05) 1983-1986
  • 12 Forgione A, Kislov V, Guraya SY, Kasakevich E, Pugliese R. Safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery even in remote areas of the world: the value of a comprehensive telementoring training program. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2015; 25 (01) 37-42
  • 13 Rosser Jr JC, Gabriel N, Herman B, Murayama M. Telementoring and teleproctoring. World J Surg 2001; 25 (11) 1438-1448
  • 14 Anvari M. Remote telepresence surgery: the Canadian experience. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (04) 537-541
  • 15 Feeley A, Feeley I, Healy E, Sheehan E, Hehir DJ. Acquisition of surgical skills in medical students via telementoring: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 2022; 270: 471-476
  • 16 Kirkpatrick AW, McKee JL, Netzer I. et al. Transoceanic telementoring of tube thoracostomy insertion: a randomized controlled trial of telementored versus unmentored insertion of tube thoracostomy by military medical technicians. Telemed J E Health 2019; 25 (08) 730-739
  • 17 Kirkpatrick AW, Tien H, LaPorta AT. et al. The marriage of surgical simulation and telementoring for damage-control surgical training of operational first responders: a pilot study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015; 79 (05) 741-747
  • 18 Soetikno R, Cabral-Prodigalidad PA, Kaltenbach T, Investigators AOE. AOE Investigators. Simulation-based mastery learning with virtual coaching: experience in training standardized upper endoscopy to novice endoscopists. Gastroenterology 2020; 159 (05) 1632-1636
  • 19 Okrainec A, Henao O, Azzie G. Telesimulation: an effective method for teaching the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in resource-restricted countries. Surg Endosc 2010; 24 (02) 417-422
  • 20 Yip HC, Uedo N, Lau LHS, Hirata D, Sano Y, Chiu PW. Asian Novel Bio-imaging and Intervention Group (ANBIIG). Telementoring for endoscopic submucosal dissection in vivo training. Dig Endosc 2023; 35 (01) 140-145
  • 21 Galvao Neto M, Jerez J, Brunaldi VO. et al. Learning process effectiveness during the COVID-19 pandemic: teleproctoring advanced endoscopic skills by training endoscopists in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty procedure. Obes Surg 2021; 31 (12) 5486-5493
  • 22 Aminoff H, Meijer S, Arnelo U, Frennert S. Telemedicine for remote surgical guidance in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: mixed methods study of practitioner attitudes. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5 (01) e20692
  • 23 Påhlsson HI, Groth K, Permert J. et al. Telemedicine: an important aid to perform high-quality endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in low-volume centers. Endoscopy 2013; 45 (05) 357-361
  • 24 Torabi J, Abeshouse M, Giibwa A. et al. Remote training and teleproctoring in gastrointestinal endoscopy for practicing surgeon in rural Uganda. Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (11) 8785-8790
  • 25 Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Franzen J. et al. A comprehensive review of telementoring applications in laparoscopic general surgery. Surg Endosc 2012; 26 (08) 2111-2116
  • 26 Schlachta CM, Sorsdahl AK, Lefebvre KL, McCune ML, Jayaraman S. A model for longitudinal mentoring and telementoring of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc 2009; 23 (07) 1634-1638
  • 27 Augestad KM, Han H, Paige J. et al. Educational implications for surgical telementoring: a current review with recommendations for future practice, policy, and research. Surg Endosc 2017; 31 (10) 3836-3846
  • 28 Nguyen NT, Okrainec A, Anvari M. et al. Sleeve gastrectomy telementoring: a SAGES multi-institutional quality improvement initiative. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (02) 682-687
  • 29 Anvari M, McKinley C, Stein H. Establishment of the world's first telerobotic remote surgical service: for provision of advanced laparoscopic surgery in a rural community. Ann Surg 2005; 241 (03) 460-464
  • 30 Shin DH, Dalag L, Azhar RA. et al. A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. BJU Int 2015; 116 (02) 302-308
  • 31 Wakasa Y, Hakamada K, Morohashi H. et al. Ensuring communication redundancy and establishing a telementoring system for robotic telesurgery using multiple communication lines. J Robot Surg 2024; 18 (01) 9
  • 32 Dinh A, Yin AL, Estrin D, Greenwald P, Fortenko A. Augmented reality in real-time telemedicine and telementoring: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023; 11: e45464
  • 33 Mahvash M, Besharati Tabrizi L. A novel augmented reality system of image projection for image-guided neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155 (05) 943-947
  • 34 López-Mir F, Naranjo V, Fuertes JJ, Alcañiz M, Bueno J, Pareja E. Design and validation of an augmented reality system for laparoscopic surgery in a real environment. BioMed Res Int 2013; 2013: 758491
  • 35 Simpfendörfer T, Baumhauer M, Müller M. et al. Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2011; 25 (12) 1841-1845
  • 36 Vosburgh KG, Stylopoulos N, Estepar RSJ, Ellis RE, Samset E, Thompson CC. EUS with CT improves efficiency and structure identification over conventional EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65 (06) 866-870
  • 37 Vosburgh KG, San José Estépar R. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): an opportunity for augmented reality guidance. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 125: 485-490
  • 38 Azagury DE, Ryou M, Shaikh SN. et al. Real-time computed tomography-based augmented reality for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery navigation. Br J Surg 2012; 99 (09) 1246-1253
  • 39 Bilgic E, Turkdogan S, Watanabe Y. et al. Effectiveness of telementoring in surgery compared with on-site mentoring: a systematic review. Surg Innov 2017; 24 (04) 379-385
  • 40 Erridge S, Yeung DKT, Patel HRH, Purkayastha S. Telementoring of surgeons: a systematic review. Surg Innov 2019; 26 (01) 95-111