Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791215
Quality and Readability of Hearing Aid-Related Websites in English and Spanish
Funding This work was supported by the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R21 DC019602 to M.B.).
Abstract
Objective To determine the readability and quality of both English and Spanish Web sites for the topic of hearing aids.
Study Design Cross-sectional Web site analysis.
Setting Various online search engines.
Methods The term “hearing aid” was queried across four popular search engines. The first resulted 75 English Web sites and first resulted 75 Spanish Web sites were extracted for data collection. Web sites that met the inclusion criteria were stratified by the presence of a Health on the Net Code (HONCode) certificate. Articles were then compiled to be independently reviewed by experts on hearing aids, using the DISCERN criteria, which allowed assessment of the quality of the Web sites. Readability was assessed by calculating the Flesch Reading Ease Score in English and the Fernandez Huerta Formula in Spanish. Readability and quality were both analyzed, comparing scores to their respective language and cross-comparing.
Results There were 37 English Web sites and 30 Spanish Web sites that met inclusion criteria. When analyzing readability, English Web sites were determined to be significantly more difficult to read (average = 55.37, standard deviation [SD] = 7.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 52.9–57.9) than the Spanish Web site counterparts (average = 58.64, SD = 5.26, 95% CI = 56.8–60.5, p = 0.035). For quality, Spanish Web sites (average = 38, SD = 9.7, 95% CI = 34.5–41.5) were determined to be of significantly higher quality than English Web sites (average = 32.16, SD = 10.60, 95% CI = 29.7–34.6). Additionally, there was a significant difference between the non-HONCode English Web sites versus the non-HONCode Spanish Web sites (p = 0.0081), signifying that Spanish non-HONCode certified Web sites were less reliable than non-HONCode certified English Web sites.
Discussion The present study highlights the importance and necessity of providing quality, readable materials to patients seeking information regarding hearing aids. This study shows that both English and Spanish Web sites are written at a level that is much higher than the American Medical Association (AMA)-recommended sixth-grade reading level, and no Web site included in this study fell at or below the AMA-recommended sixth-grade reading level. English and Spanish Web sites also lacked consistency and quality, as evidenced by their wide variability in DISCERN scores. Specifically, Hispanic patients are more likely to suffer long-term consequences of their health care due to low levels of health literacy. It is important to bridge this gap by providing adequate reading materials. It is especially important to provide evidence-based claims that are directly supported by experts in the field.
Previous Presentation
This research was presented at the Triological Society Combined Sections Meeting, Coronado, CA, January May 26–28, 2023.
Publication History
Received: 07 March 2023
Accepted: 12 April 2024
Article published online:
18 December 2024
© 2024. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What is health literacy?. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. February 2, 2022. Accessed April 4, 2022 at: https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html
- 2 Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155 (02) 97-107
- 3 Center for Health Care Strategies. What is Health Literacy. Kaiser, CA: Center for Health Care Strategies; 2013
- 4 Hernandez N. Hearing loss statistics 2023: numbers we can't ignore. National Council on Aging. Accessed November 8, 2023 at: https://www.ncoa.org/adviser/hearing-aids/hearing-loss-statistics/#:~:text=The%20cost%20of%20hearing%20loss&text=Global%20cost%20of%20hearing%20loss,were%20from%20low%2Dincome%20countries
- 5 Madans JH, Weeks JD, Elgaddal N. Hearing difficulties among adults: United States, 2019. NCHS Data Brief 2021; 414 (414) 1-8
- 6 Eltorai AE, Ghanian S, Adams Jr CA, Born CT, Daniels AH. Readability of patient education materials on the American Association for Surgery of Trauma website. Arch Trauma Res 2014; 3 (02) e18161
- 7 Laplante-Lévesque A. Quality and Readability of Hearing Information on the Internet. Audiology Now 2013
- 8 National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. (2021). Quick statistics about hearing. National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. Accessed April 15, 2022 at: https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/quick-statistics-hearing#9
- 9 Lin FR, Niparko JK, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171 (20) 1851-1852
- 10 Blackwell DL, Lucas JW, Clarke TC. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 10 2012; (260) 2014
- 11 Cruickshanks KJ, Dhar S, Dinces E. et al. Hearing Impairment prevalence and associated risk factors in the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 141 (07) 641-648
- 12 Lande L. Case study: how a hearing aid company doubled the percentage of sales to valuable first-time buyers. MarketingProfs. October 2, 2007. Accessed April 2, 2022 at: https://www.marketingprofs.com/casestudy/2007/9296/how-a-hearing-aid-company-doubled-the-percentage-of-sales-to-valuable-first-time-buyers
- 13 Manchaiah V, Kelly-Campbell RJ, Bellon-Harn ML, Beukes EW. Quality, readability, and suitability of hearing health-related materials: a descriptive review. Am J Audiol 2020; 29 (03) 513-527
- 14 Hernandez C, Cruz M, Robinson JK. Spanish-speaking patient health educational preferences. Arch Dermatol 2011; 147 (02) 242-244
- 15 Arnold ML, Hyer K, Small BJ. et al. Hearing aid prevalence and factors related to use among older adults from the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 145 (06) 501-508
- 16 Grose EM, Holmes CP, Aravinthan KA, Wu V, Lee JM. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to nasal septoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 50 (01) 16
- 17 Atcherson SR, Zraick RI, Brasseux RE. Readability of patient-reported outcome questionnaires for use with persons with tinnitus. Ear Hear 2011; 32 (05) 671-673
- 18 Reed NS, Altan A, Deal JA. et al. Trends in health care costs and utilization associated with untreated hearing loss over 10 years. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 145 (01) 27-34
- 19 McCormack A, Fortnum H. Why do people fitted with hearing aids not wear them?. Int J Audiol 2013; 52 (05) 360-368
- 20 Levy H, Janke A. Health literacy and access to care. J Health Commun 2016; 21 (Suppl, Suppl 1): 43-50
- 21 Koskan A, Friedman DB, Hilfinger Messias DAK. Health Literacy among Hispanics: a systematic research review (1992–2008). Hisp Health Care Int 2010; 8 (02) 65-76
- 22 Marrone NL, Wong AA. Taking the pulse of Hispanic hearing health. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 147 (04) 387-388
- 23 Coco L, Colina S, Atcherson SR, Marrone N. Readability level of Spanish-language patient-reported outcome measures in audiology and otolaryngology. Am J Audiol 2017; 26 (03) 309-317
- 24 La Scala JD. The readability of cochlear implant brochures: a potential factor in parent choice. Honors Undergraduate Theses. 1033; 2021 . Accessed April 2, 2022 at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses/1033
- 25 De Alba Rosales A, Schober D, Johansson P. Examining perceptions of Spanish language health information among Hispanics living in the United States: a qualitative study assessing videos, brochures, and websites. Health Promot Pract 2021; 22 (03) 385-394