Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2024; 41(05): 466-472
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1792140
Review Article

Breast Biopsy Procedure Toolkit: Ultrasound, 2D Stereotactic, 3D Tomosynthesis, and MRI-Guided Procedures

Kirti M. Kulkarni
1   Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Anne Darrow
1   Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Monika Dangeti
1   Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Jacob S. Ecanow
2   Department of Radiology, Endeavor Health, Evanston, Illinois
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This article explores various techniques and tips for performing successful percutaneous biopsies of the breast and axillary lymph nodes using different imaging modalities. The discussion includes detailed image guidance on ultrasound-guided, stereotactic/tomosynthesis-guided, and MRI-guided biopsies. Advice for draining fluid collections in the breast is also reviewed. Key findings include the comparative effectiveness of different imaging techniques and practical advice for improving procedural outcomes. This information is particularly relevant for radiologists involved in diagnostic and interventional breast care. Recommendations for optimizing biopsy procedures and managing complications are also presented.

Keywords

breast biopsy - ultrasound - stereotactic - MRI - interventional radiology


Publication History

Article published online:
10 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions. II: Recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (08) 1168-1184.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D, Deshpande V, Gregory N, Strand V. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 consecutive cases of missed breast cancer. Cancer 2003; 97 (08) 1824-1831
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Harvey JA, Moran RE. US-guided core needle biopsy of the breast: technique and pitfalls. Radiographics 1998; 18 (04) 867-877
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK. Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 2007; 27 (01) 79-94
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA. et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187 (02) 507-511
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L. et al. US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 2008; 248 (02) 406-413
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR. et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166 (02) 341-346
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Apesteguía L, Pina LJ. Ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy of breast lesions. Insights Imaging 2011; 2 (04) 493-500
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Abe H, Schacht D, Sennett CA, Newstead GM, Schmidt RA. Utility of preoperative ultrasound for predicting pN2 or higher stage axillary lymph node involvement in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200 (03) 696-702
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Bhatt AA, Whaley DH, Lee CU. Ultrasound-Guided breast biopsies: basic and new techniques. J Ultrasound Med 2021; 40 (07) 1427-1443
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Abe H, Schmidt RA, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, Mueller JS, Newstead GM. Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy–clinical experience in 100 patients. Radiology 2009; 250 (01) 41-49
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Ganott MA, Zuley ML, Abrams GS. et al. ultrasound guided core biopsy versus fine needle aspiration for evaluation of axillary lymphadenopathy in patients with breast cancer. ISRN Oncol 2014; 2014: 703160
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Huang ML, Hess K, Candelaria RP. et al. Comparison of the accuracy of US-guided biopsy of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge automated cutting needle biopsy devices, and review of the literature. Eur Radiol 2017; 27 (07) 2928-2933
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Yeh ED, Jacene HA, Bellon JR. et al. What radiologists need to know about diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory breast cancer: a multidisciplinary approach. Radiographics 2013; 33 (07) 2003-2017
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Huppe AI, Brem RF. Minimally invasive breast procedures: practical tips and tricks. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214 (02) 306-315
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Huang ML, Adrada BE, Candelaria R, Thames D, Dawson D, Yang WT. Stereotactic breast biopsy: pitfalls and pearls. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 17 (01) 32-39
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Shin K, Teichgraeber D, Martaindale S, Whitman GJ. Tomosynthesis-guided core biopsy of the breast: why and how to use it. J Clin Imaging Sci 2018; 8: 28
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Vijapura CA, Wahab RA, Thakore AG, Mahoney MC. Upright tomosynthesis-guided breast biopsy: tips, tricks, and troubleshooting. Radiographics 2021; 41 (05) 1265-1282
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Esserman LE, Cura MA, DaCosta D. Recognizing pitfalls in early and late migration of clip markers after imaging-guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiographics 2004; 24 (01) 147-156
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 2008; 246 (01) 116-124
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Spick C, Baltzer PA. Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2014; 273 (02) 401-409
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Plantade R, Thomassin-Naggara I. MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsies. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014; 95 (09) 779-801
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Mann RM, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA. et al; European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI), with language review by Europa Donna–The European Breast Cancer Coalition. Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information. Eur Radiol 2015; 25 (12) 3669-3678
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 McGrath AL, Price ER, Eby PR, Rahbar H. MRI-guided breast interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 46 (03) 631-645
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar