Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801335
Fusion of Interventional Radiology with Surgery and Endoscopy to Advance Therapies in Complex Gastrointestinal Disease
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/sir/EFirst/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0044-1801335_2400008-1.jpg)
Abstract
Interventional radiology techniques using image guidance have revolutionized healthcare by enabling less invasive approaches for “difficult-to-treat” conditions. Complex gastrointestinal (GI) conditions such as bowel obstructions, enterocutaneous fistulas, and other enteric maladies are major causes of morbidity and mortality; are rising in incidence worldwide; and may benefit from the integration of interventional radiology techniques into current surgical/endoscopic management strategies, analogous to cardiovascular interventions of the past few decades. Conservative medical management of these intestinal conditions can fail or result in extended hospital admissions and poor quality of life, while current operative management can be fraught with complications and death, especially in high-risk patients with prior abdominal surgeries. The prevalence of GI conditions requiring intervention and the potential for complications and morbidity with current methods, including laparoscopy, suggests that this is a field ripe for innovation. This article outlines an innovative approach to managing complex GI problems that we are developing at our institution, combining interventional radiological techniques with advanced surgical/endoscopic methods. Specifically, we attempt to highlight the benefits of a multidisciplinary team using advanced imaging guidance to perform novel percutaneous, endoscopic, and surgical procedures for high-surgical risk patients with intestinal problems requiring intervention.
Keywords
small bowel obstruction - enterocutaneous fistula - multidisciplinary team - cone beam CT - interventional radiologyPublication History
Article published online:
29 January 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Rami Reddy SR, Cappell MS. A systematic review of the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of small bowel obstruction. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2017; 19 (06) 28
- 2 Long B, Robertson J, Koyfman A. Emergency medicine evaluation and management of small bowel obstruction: evidence-based recommendations. J Emerg Med 2019; 56 (02) 166-176
- 3 Sikirica V, Bapat B, Candrilli SD, Davis KL, Wilson M, Johns A. The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US. BMC Surg 2011; 11: 13
- 4 Hollington P, Mawdsley J, Lim W, Gabe SM, Forbes A, Windsor AJ. An 11-year experience of enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (12) 1646-1651
- 5 Teixeira PGR, Inaba K, Dubose J. et al. Enterocutaneous fistula complicating trauma laparotomy: a major resource burden. Am Surg 2009; 75 (01) 30-32
- 6 Hatchimonji JS, Passman J, Kaufman EJ. et al. Enterocutaneous fistula after emergency general surgery: mortality, readmission, and financial burden. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020; 89 (01) 167-172
- 7 Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP, Ko CY, Esnaola NF. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, American Geriatrics Society. Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215 (04) 453-466
- 8 Audisio RA, Ramesh H, Longo WE, Zbar AP, Pope D. Preoperative assessment of surgical risk in oncogeriatric patients. Oncologist 2005; 10 (04) 262-268
- 9 Liu XR, Zhang BL, Peng D, Liu F, Li ZW, Wang CY. The impact of previous abdominal surgery on colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Updates Surg 2024; 76 (04) 1331-1338
- 10 Davis P, Hayden J, Springer J, Bailey J, Molinari M, Johnson P. Prognostic factors for morbidity and mortality in elderly patients undergoing acute gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review. Can J Surg 2014; 57 (02) E44-E52
- 11 Ngu JCY, Kuo LJ, Teo NZ. Minimally invasive surgery in the geriatric patient with colon cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11 (03) 540-544
- 12 Scarpa M, Erroi F, Ruffolo C. et al. Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: quality of life, body image, cosmesis, and functional results. Surg Endosc 2009; 23 (03) 577-582
- 13 Ihnát P, Martínek L, Mitták M, Vávra P, Ihnát Rudinská L, Zonča P. Quality of life after laparoscopic and open resection of colorectal cancer. Dig Surg 2014; 31 (03) 161-168
- 14 Kwon YH, Jeon SW, Lee YK. Endoscopic management of refractory benign colorectal strictures. Clin Endosc 2013; 46 (05) 472-475
- 15 Mueller T, Rieder B, Bechtner G, Pfeiffer A. The response of Crohn's strictures to endoscopic balloon dilation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31 (06) 634-639
- 16 Sunada K, Shinozaki S, Nagayama M. et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with small intestinal strictures secondary to Crohnʼs disease after double-balloon endoscopy-assisted balloon dilation. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22 (02) 380-386
- 17 Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta Radiol 1953; 39 (05) 368-376
- 18 Matsuo K, Urakawa S, Symer M, Sedrakyan A, Pua B, Milsom J. Iterative evaluation of novel access techniques for small bowel obstruction: combining image guided, percutaneous, and endoscopic methods. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol 2023; 5 (01) e000150
- 19 Urakawa S, Holzwanger DJ, Hirashita T. et al. Novel percutaneous access to the large intestine using a double-balloon endoluminal platform for excision of a large polyp. Endoscopy 2022; 54 (07) E331-E333
- 20 Berardi R, Morgese F, Rinaldi S. et al. Benefits and limitations of a multidisciplinary approach in cancer patient management. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12: 9363-9374
- 21 Siddique O, Yoo ER, Perumpail RB. et al. The importance of a multidisciplinary approach to hepatocellular carcinoma. J Multidiscip Healthc 2017; 10: 95-100
- 22 Morton G, Masters J, Cowburn PJ. Multidisciplinary team approach to heart failure management. Heart 2018; 104 (16) 1376-1382
- 23 Musselman K, Shin JH, Lamparello NA. et al. Patient experiences with a multidisciplinary fibroid program. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024; 31 (07) 592-600.e2
- 24 Danilov A, Danilov A, Barulin A, Kurushina O, Latysheva N. Interdisciplinary approach to chronic pain management. Postgrad Med 2020; 132 (Suppl. 03) 5-9
- 25 Lucarini A, Garbarino GM, Orlandi P. et al; Sant'Andrea GLAM collaborative group. From “cure” to “care”: the role of the multidisciplinary team on colorectal cancer patients' satisfaction and oncological outcomes. J Multidiscip Healthc 2022; 15: 1415-1426
- 26 Cirocco WC, Rusin LC. Fluoroscopy. A valuable ally during difficult colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 1996; 10 (11) 1080-1084
- 27 Eickhoff A, Pickhardt PJ, Hartmann D, Riemann JF. Colon anatomy based on CT colonography and fluoroscopy: impact on looping, straightening and ancillary manoeuvres in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42 (04) 291-296
- 28 Matsuki M, Okuda J, Kanazawa S. et al. Virtual CT colectomy by three-dimensional imaging using multidetector-row CT for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Abdom Imaging 2005; 30 (06) 698-708
- 29 Ryu S, Kitagawa T, Goto K. et al. Intraoperative holographic guidance using virtual reality and mixed reality technology during laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Anticancer Res 2022; 42 (10) 4849-4856
- 30 Key BM, Tutton SM, Scheidt MJ. Cone-beam CT with enhanced needle guidance and augmented fluoroscopy overlay: applications in interventional radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221 (01) 92-101
- 31 Urakawa S, Hirashita T, Hirashita Y, Matsuo K, Lowenfeld L, Milsom JW. Use of a novel endoscopic overtube with bilateral tool channels for endoscopic resection of experimental lesions and repair of intestinal defects in the right colon: preclinical trial. Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (02) 1593-1600